Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr
2026 State Route 45, Austinburg, OH 44010 · Ashtabula County · (440) 275-3019
99 certified beds, about 77 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366088 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 30, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 17 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.74 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.34 of those hours.
42.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Atrium Centers, an affiliated group of 26 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
601/20
401/23
701/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
2E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 30, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility did not ensure menu spreadsheets were followed to provide appropriate portion sizes to Resident #26, #40, #43, #55 and #57 who the facility identified as receiving pureed diets. In addition, the facility did not ensure all other residents receiving meals from the kitchen received appropriate portions sizes at meals excluding Resident #441 who received a full liquid diet and Resident #64 who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 82.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen excluding Resident #64 who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 82.
- E Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were recorded for Residents #13, #18, #65, and #66, failed to ensure weights were obtained and recorded into the medical record for residents #13 and #41 and failed to ensure therapeutic diets were implemented as ordered for Residents #65 and #66 to allow for accurate nutritional assessment and monitoring of nutritional status. This affected five residents (#13, #18, #41, #65, and #66) out of five reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 82.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the failed to ensure palatable meals were served to Resident #16, #17, #21, #24, #27, #31, #32, #56 and #73. This affected nine residents (#16, #17, #21, #24, #27, #31, #32, #56 and #73) of 21 residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 82.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of Resident #74's fall to the resident representative. This affected one resident (#74) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 82.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team was present as required when care plan conferences were conducted for Resident #24 and Resident #75. This affected two residents (Resident #24 and #75) of two residents reviewed for care planing. The facility census was 82.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to give medications with an error rate of under five percent. This affected one resident (Resident #435) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The total census was 82.
January 12, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the physician and/or resident responsible party was notified of change in condition. This affected three residents (#15, #52, and #61) out of seven residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 74.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate and timely weights were obtained for Residents #52 and #171, who were both on feeding tubes. This affected two residents (#52 and #171) of three residents reviewed for weights. The facility census was 74.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility did not ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed. This affected two residents (#11 and #61) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 74.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure insulin was dated when opened. This affected two residents (#9 and #28) out of three residents observed during the medication storage review. This had the potential to affect eight residents (#6, #9, #10, #28, #38, #62, #174, and #219) that received insulin. The facility census was 74.
January 30, 2020Standard inspection · 6 citations
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were accurate related to medication usage and injections for Resident #2 and injections for Resident #29. This affected two residents (Resident #2 and #29) of 25 residents reviewed for MDS assessments.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for Resident #2 was accurate and did failed to ensure a care plan was implemented for Resident #29 related to a a blood thinning medication. This affected two residents of 25 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/28/19 with diagnoses including chronic lung disease, diabetes, tricuspid insufficiency (valve in the heart does not work properly), and endocarditis (infection in the heart). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/10/19 revealed Resident #2's cognition was intact. Review of the plan of care for Resident #2 revealed a care plan dated 06/10/19 stating Resident #2 required oxygen therapy for chronic lung disease. [...]
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to collaboratively provide meaningful, individualized activities to meet the personal preferences of Resident #23. This affected one of 24 residents screened for activities.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who smoked were free from accident hazards. This affected two (Resident #2 and Resident #14) of three residents reviewed for smoking.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure insulin was dated when opened for Resident #226. This affected one resident (Resident #226) out of eleven residents (Residents #1, #16, #19, #21, #37, #45, #49, #54, #62, #73, and #226) on insulin. The facility census was 82.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review the facility did not ensure the glucometer meter (a medical device used to measure the concentration of glucose in the blood) was cleaned properly for infection control purposes after Resident #73's blood sugar was obtained. This affected one resident (Resident #7) out of two residents observed for glucometer checks. This had the potential to affect nine residents (Resident #1, #2, #21, #28, #37, #49, #54, #62, and #73) who had orders for blood sugar checks.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 30, 2025, 4 on January 12, 2023, 7 on January 30, 2020.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- C Establish policies and procedures for volunteers.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.74 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.34 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.50 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.09 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.31 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.0% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.84 on weekdays and 3.50 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.35 in April to June 2025 to 3.74 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.74 | 0.34 | 3.84 | 3.50 | 2.8% | 0 of 90 | 77 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.78 | 0.42 | 3.90 | 3.45 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 76 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.77 | 0.48 | 3.94 | 3.36 | 9.3% | 0 of 92 | 78 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.35 | 0.42 | 3.52 | 2.92 | 0.6% | 0 of 91 | 79 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.4 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.0 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.7 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: ORION AUSTINBURG LLC. CMS links this home to Atrium Centers, a group of 26 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orion Operating Services LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/16/2007 |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/16/2007 | |
| Bailey, Essel | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/27/2012 | |
| Finney, Donald | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/27/2012 | |
| Amicus Capital Holdings Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/18/2021 | |
| Amicus Capital Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/18/2021 | |
| Paredes, Miguel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/18/2021 | |
| Fifth Third Bank | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/07/2017 | |
| Lument Real Estate Capital, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 05/01/2022 | |
| Heller, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Johnson, Cindy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Bailey, Essel | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Finney, Donald | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2006 | |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/16/2007 | |
| Fifth Third Bank | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/07/2017 | |
| Orion Operating Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/16/2007 | |
| Al-Shahed, Abdallah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/12/2022 | |
| Anderson, Curt | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Cherry, Jill | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Gaylord, Celestine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/18/2017 | |
| Heller, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Johnson, Cindy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Knight, Melissa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Maurice, Sharon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/22/2025 | |
| Sharp, Lillian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2016 | |
| Sutton, Tracy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/12/2022 | |
| Vagi, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Zetter, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2026 | |
| Amicus Capital Holdings Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/18/2021 | |
| Amicus Capital Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/18/2021 | |
| Amicus Properties LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Broad River Rehabilitation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2021 | |
| Evergreen Two LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/18/2026 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Leaderstat Ltd | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Ocs Real Estate Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Omnicare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Orion Properties Fifteen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2022 | |
| Plante & Moran PLLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Al-Shahed, Abdallah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/12/2022 | |
| Anderson, Curt | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Cherry, Jill | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Gaylord, Celestine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/18/2017 | |
| Heller, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Johnson, Cindy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Knight, Melissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Maurice, Sharon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/22/2025 | |
| Sharp, Lillian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2016 | |
| Sutton, Tracy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/12/2022 | |
| Vagi, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Zetter, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Pine Grove Healthcare Center Geneva, 4.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 1 citation
- Geneva Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Geneva, 4.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Jefferson Healthcare Center Jefferson, 5.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Rae Ann Geneva Geneva, 5.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Saybrook Landing Ashtabula, 6.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
- Carington Park Ashtabula, 7.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Country Club Ret Center I I I Ashtabula, 7.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Madison Health Care Madison, 8.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 36 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 30, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr?
- CMS lists 54 owners and managers, and links the home to Atrium Centers. Legal business name: ORION AUSTINBURG LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.