Avir at Center
280 Moffitt Dr, Center, TX 75935 · Shelby County · (936) 598-3371
137 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455550 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 23, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 17 health citations since May 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,113 in the last three years; the largest was $9,113, and the latest is dated March 26, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.53 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.26 of those hours.
56.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Avir Health Group, an affiliated group of 118 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
July 23, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained the right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing for 1 of 1 facility. The facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to receive visitors between 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM.The deficient practice could place residents at risk of isolation, decreased emotional well-being, and diminished quality of life.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #17) and 2 of 5 staff (LVN A and CNA B) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and CNA B followed enhanced barrier precautions for Residents #10 and #17 on 07/21/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.
- D Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in safe operating condition with the pilot light burner staying lit for 1 of 6 burners and allowing gas to leak on 07/21/25 and 07/22/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of a fire and not receiving their meals in a timely manner.
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area from toilet and bathing facilities for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for call lights. (Resident #11). The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's emergency call light in the bathroom would reach the floor. The call light cord for Resident #11 was three feet above the floor level. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving timely assistance.
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident, in 3 of 11 resident rooms reviewed for required square footage. (Resident room #s 300, 309 and 310). The facility did not have at least 80 square feet per resident in resident room #s 300, 309, and 310. This failure could place residents at risk of having inadequate space for personal belongings, guests, and limit the resident's ability to move about in the room. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident, in 3 of 11 resident rooms reviewed for required square footage. (Resident room #s 300, 309 and 310). The facility did not have at least 80 square feet per resident in resident room #s 300, 309, and 310. [...]
March 26, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from eloping on 7/23/2024 when he was able to exit the secured unit and exited the facility through the main entrance. The noncompliance was determined to be PNC (past non-compliance) . The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) began on 7/23/24 and ended on 7/23/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk for serious injury and accidents.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment that did not result in bodily injury were reported to the state agency within 24 hours for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The Administrator failed to report to the state agency withing 24 hours concerning an allegation of neglect on 07/23/2024 when Resident #1 eloped from the secured unit out of the entrance doors to the unit and out of the front entrance of the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for harm and injury.
June 5, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements and kitchen sanitation 1. The dietary aide failed to effectively wear a hair net to cover all her hair on 6/03/2024 and 6/04/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled, dated, and not kept past their expiration dates. 3. The cook and dietary manager failed to properly perform hand washing when performing duties in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #34 and #25) and 2 of 4 staff (CNA E and CNA G) reviewed for infection control. The Hospice Aide did not follow enhanced barrier precautions when she provided care to Resident #34 on 6/3/2024. CNA C did not sanitize or wash her hands between glove changes and wiped a female resident from back to front when providing incontinent care to Resident #25 on 6/4/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals, and preferences for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #19) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's oxygen tubing was changed per the physician orders. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of developing respiratory infections and complications.
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident, in 5 of 18 resident rooms reviewed for required square footage. (Resident room #s 300, 306, 308, 309 and 310). The facility did not have at least 80 square feet per resident in resident room #s 300, 306, 308, 309, and 310. This failure could place residents at risk of having inadequate space for personal belongings, guests, and limit the resident's ability to move about in the room.
May 3, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 2 medication carts (nurse cart unit 1 and unit 2) and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (unit 2) reviewed for labeling and storage. The facility failed to remove expired insulin from the nurse medication cart on unit 1 and unit 2 for Resident # 11 and Resident # 21. The facility failed to remove expired tuberculin PPD (purified protein derivative) Mantoux testing solution from the medication storage room on unit 2. These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity for one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for dignity in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's feeding pump had a dignity/privacy cover while out of her room. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk for a diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #19) reviewed for PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services). The SW failed to refer Resident #19 for a resident review after being diagnosed with bipolar disorder current episode manic severe with psychotic features. The onset of the diagnosis was 3/11/2022. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed PASSAR services.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 2) reviewed for medication administration. LVN C failed to administer Resident # 2's water flush through his feeding tube as ordered by the physician with medication administration. This failure could place residents who receive medications through a feeding tube at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that the urinary catheter bag for Resident #2 did not touch the floor. This failure could place residents at risk for infection. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 5/2/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recent admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including: [...]
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident, in 5 of 18 resident rooms reviewed for required square footage. (Resident room #s 300, 306, 308, 309 and 310). The facility did not have at least 80 square feet per resident in resident room #s 300, 306, 308, 309, and 310. This failure could place residents at risk of having inadequate space for personal belongings, guests, and limit the resident's ability to move about in the room.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 23, 2025, 3 on June 5, 2024, 5 on May 3, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 26, 2025 | Fine | $9,113 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.53 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.39 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.8% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.71 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.92 in April to June 2025 to 3.53 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.53 | 0.26 | 3.71 | 3.08 | 0.7% | 1 of 90 | 45 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.27 | 0.28 | 3.43 | 2.88 | 0.4% | 5 of 92 | 41 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.41 | 0.32 | 3.59 | 2.97 | 0.2% | 4 of 92 | 35 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.92 | 0.36 | 4.17 | 3.26 | 5.1% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.0 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Avir Health Group, a group of 118 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fannin County Hospital Authority | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2021 |
| Sanderson, Clark | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| 280 Moffitt Dr Opco, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Allen, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Freund, Nochum | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Rogers, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/09/2023 | |
| Travitsky, Aaron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Dagan, Amitai | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/04/2025 | |
| Goldberger, Abraham | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/04/2025 | |
| Goldberger, Faigy | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/04/2025 | |
| 1008 Citizens Trail Property Owner LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Nnn Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Op, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Allen, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Rogers, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2025: "Keep all essential equipment working safely."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Pine Grove Nursing Center Center, 0 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Focused Care of Center Center, 1.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation San Augustine, 18.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Avir at San Augustine San Augustine, 18.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Colonial Pines Healthcare Center San Augustine, 19.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Garrison Nursing Home & Rehabilitation Center Garrison, 20.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Avir at Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avir at Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avir at Center get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 23, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Avir at Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,113 in the last three years.
- Does Avir at Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avir at Center?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Avir Health Group. Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.