Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / San Augustine

Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation

451 S El Camino Crossing, San Augustine, TX 75972 · San Augustine County · (936) 275-2900

90 certified beds, about 47 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675729 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 1, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 20 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.23 of those hours.

35.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
7E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 1, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all essential equipment in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 stove reviewed for food service in that:The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in working order. One of four gas stove burners (right front) did not light properly when the knob was turned. This failure could place residents who eat out of the kitchen at risk of injury and undercooked food.
  2. F
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    F925 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for one of one kitchen reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep mice out of the kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk of food borne illness and exposure to pests.
  3. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards and each resident received adequate supervision as is possible for 3 of 15 residents (Resident's #2, #16, and #17) reviewed for accidents and hazards.1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2 did not have a rechargeable vape device secured to his finger with a hair tie and tape while in bed on 3/30/26.2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #16 had a safe smoking assessment prior to being allowed to keep electronic vape devices at bedside on 3/30/26.3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #17 did not use an electronic vape device in her room on 3/30/26. These failures could place residents at risk of secondhand exposure, nicotine overdose and vape related injuries.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts (nurse cart for Hall C/D) reviewed for labeling and storage. The facility did not document when insulin was opened from the nurse medication cart for Hall C/D.These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications, decreased quality of life, and hospitalization.
February 5, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements and kitchen sanitation 1. The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer were labeled, dated, and sealed. 2. The facility failed to ensure dented cans were separated from non-dented cans. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #16, Resident #26, and Resident #20) and 3 of 5 staff (CNA A, CNA C, and CNA D) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A washed or sanitized her hands when passing out meal trays to residents on Hall B on 2/3/2025. CNA A did not sanitize or wash her hands between glove changes when incontinent care was provided to Resident #16 on 2/4/2025. The facility failed to ensure a Yaunker suction tip (an oral suctioning tool) for Resident #20 was not left open and uncovered on a bedside table. [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #16 and Resident #34) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the use of side rails for Resident #16 that were in use on 2/4/2025. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the use of side rails for Resident #34 that were in use on 2/3/25. [...]
  4. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #16 and Resident #34) reviewed for bed rails. The facility failed to obtain an order or complete an assessment for the use of bedrails for Resident #16 who had full bed rails on both sides of her bed on 2/4/2025. The facility failed to obtain an order or complete an assessment for the use of assist rail for Resident #34 who had a ½ rail in place to the left side of his bed on 2/3/25. These failures could place residents at risk of entrapment or injury.
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for medication storage. The facility did not ensure Caladryl lotion was not stored at the bedside for Resident #50 on [DATE]. This failure could place all residents at risk of misuse of medication and decreased quality of life.
January 15, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    F839 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws for 2 of 16 licensed nursing staff (ADON and RN A) reviewed for staff qualifications. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ADON's nursing license was not expired between [DATE] and [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN A's nursing license did not expire as of [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by a licensed nurse.
September 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent CNA A, on 9/04/24, from abusing Resident #1 when she purposefully tossed water on her. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 09/04/24 and ended on 09/04/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The failure could place residents at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life and further abuse.
January 24, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen. The facility did not label or date a bag of unknown substance in the freezer, whipped topping, and diced peppers, did not dispose of cheesecake, lettuce, chicken wings and shrimp, and did not cover drinks stored in walk in cooler. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illnesses.
  2. E
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen review recommendations from the pharmacy consultant were acted upon for 7 of 16 residents (Residents #209, #40, #308, #10, #6, #44 and #208) reviewed for drug regimen review. -The Facility did not follow up on the pharmacy consultant's recommendations for Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) dated 01/11/2023 for Resident #209, #40 and #308 until 05/03/2023, four months after original recommendation. -The Facility did not follow up on the pharmacy consultant's recommendations for Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) dated 05/10/2023 and 05/11/2023 for Resident #10, #6, #44 and #208 until 07/10/2023 and 07/11/2023, two months after original recommendation. -The Facility did not develop policies and procedures to address the timeframes of the medication regimen review (MRR). [...]
  3. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 1 of 4 halls (D hall) reviewed for palatable food. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature on 1/24/2024 to residents on D hall for the breakfast meal. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life.
  4. E
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for call lights. (Resident #41 & #49). The facility failed to ensure Resident #41 and #49's emergency call light in the bathroom would reach the floor. The call light cords were gathered and secured with a rubber band. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life.
  5. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's care plan reflected current resident code status within 7 days of the resident assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care to meet their current needs.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    F805 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet the needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #27) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #27 received nectar thickened liquids as ordered. These failures could place residents at risk for aspiration.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident # 28) reviewed for infection control. CNA A failed to perform proper hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #28 on 01/23/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections.
November 15, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property was provided for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident #3 and Resident#4). The facility failed to prevent a diversion (misappropriation ) of Resident #3's methocarbamol tablets (used to treat muscle spasms and pain) a total of 60 tablets in two blister packs filled 5/23/23. One blister pack of the two packs dated 5/23/23 was observed in custody at the Sheriff's department containing 22 of 30 tablets and Resident #4's bottle of amoxicillin capsules (used to treat infection) was observed in custody at the Sherriff's department on 11/15/23, after being turned in by complainant. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, misappropriation of property, and dignity.
  2. D
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    F553 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or legal representatives right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care, for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility did not include the correct representatives for Resident #1 (representative D and representative E) in the initial plan meeting on 9/21/23 to discuss Resident #1's care . This failure could cause residents or representatives to not be able to participate in the planning of their care, not receiving the care they want or need, and not being informed of all services offered by the facility.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 1, 2026, 2 on February 5, 2025.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 1, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · April 1, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · February 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.653.393.86
Registered nurses0.230.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.142.983.42
Nurse aides2.27
Licensed practical nurses1.16
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)35.6%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.22 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.86 on weekdays and 3.14 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.70 in April to June 2025 to 3.65 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.650.233.863.14 0.0%1 of 9047
Oct to Dec 20253.770.264.033.11 0.0%0 of 9245
Jul to Sep 20253.960.244.243.26 0.0%1 of 9248
Apr to Jun 20253.700.263.913.15 0.0%0 of 9148
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.315.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.50.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.80.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.73.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
35.714.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.53.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.19.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
35.325.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.712.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.32.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.02.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.8% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: NACOGDOCHES COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bennett, KristinW-2 managing employeeIndividual07/13/2021
Lindsey, LynnCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2021
Innovative Solutions Healthcare LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization03/01/2020
Nacogdoches County Hospital DistrictOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 5, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  2. Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Keep all essential equipment working safely."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 1, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Stonecreek Nursing & Rehabilitation?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers. Legal business name: NACOGDOCHES COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection