Benedictine Living Community Mother of Mercy
230 Church Avenue, Box 676, Albany, MN 56307 · Stearns County · (320) 845-2195
76 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245339 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 26, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 31 health citations since October 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $97,996 in the last three years; the largest was $70,618, and the latest is dated June 4, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.71 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.69 of those hours.
50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Benedictine Health System, an affiliated group of 23 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
July 15, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a placed peripheral insertion central catheter (PICC) line was monitored and recorded in the medical record to ensure continuity of care in accordance with current standards of care for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for PICC care. R1 had a PICC line in place for over 30 days at the care center but the measurement from insertion to catheter hub (used to determine if the line is migrating) was not consistently tracked or recorded. This could delay identification of line migration or contribute to associated complications (i.e., thrombosis, vessel perforation, catheter dysfunction).
June 4, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. R1's care plan directed bed mobility with assistance of two staff. On 5/4/26, R1 fell out of her bed while one staff provided cares without assistance. This resulted in R1's left hip fracture, pain, and fear. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 5/4/26 when nursing assistant (NA)-A provided cares, including bed mobility, without the assistance of another staff person. R1's care plan, dated 4/28/26, directed assistance of two staff for bed mobility. The IJ was removed on 5/5/26 when the facility provided education to staff regarding following care plans, audits to monitor staff performance and policy review. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to develop the care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for care plans when R3's care sheet directed staff to transfer with a full body mechanical lift, but the staff transferred her with a mechanical standing lift.
May 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess the independent use of an electric lift chair for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm when R1 attempted to self-transfer from the lift chair, fell, hit her head, and sustained a hematoma (a collection of blood in the tissues after an injury) and laceration of the forehead, sent to the emergency department (ED) for further evaluation, wound care, pain control, and received four stitches to the right forehead. R1 sustained an additional fall from a wheel chair, hit her head, sustained a hematoma to right lateral proximal (point of attachment) hip, sent to ED for further evaluation and pain control. The facility implemented corrective action, so the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance.
February 26, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored, labeled, dated and discarded properly. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 1 refrigerator in the kitchen and 2 of 3-unit refrigerators were adequately monitored for temperature and food quality to reduce the risk of complications or illness. These findings had the potential to affect all 56 residents within the care center.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) was given to residents whose Medicare part A services were ending for 2 of 3 residents (R73, R48) who were reviewed for NOMNC and ABN notices.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct care conferences for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for care planning.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration per physician order for 1 of 1 resident (R64) reviewed for pharmaceutical services.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to properly sanitize a shared glucometer after use on 1 of 1 residents (R71), reviewed for blood sugar monitoring.
December 20, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 12 citations
- G Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor and implement interventions for heart failure for 2 of 2 residents (R33, R43) reviewed. This resulted in actual harm to R33 who was re-hospitalized for exacerbation of heart failure.
- F Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the required staffing information was posted daily. This had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility and their visitors who may wish to view the information.
- F Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment which included all of the necessary components to provide adequate care and services to the residents in the facility. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all 57 residents in the facility.
- F Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance Assessment/ Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI) program that was effective in identifying, assessing, performing, developing and implementing appropriate plans of action to assure clinical care, quality of care, resident rights and services were identified to maintain acceptable levels of performance. Furthermore, the facility failed to conduct ongoing quality assessment and assurance activities, develop, and implement appropriate plans of action to correct repeated quality deficiencies identified during the survey the facility was aware of or should have been aware of which had the potential to adversely affect all 57 residents which resided in the facility.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure changes in medication were communicated to 1 of 1 residents (R33) reviewed for notification of change in medications.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives for emergency care and treatment were accurately reflected in all areas of the medical chart to ensure resident wishes would be implemented correctly in an emergent situation for 1 of 24 residents (R13) reviewed for advanced directives.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify and consult provider for 2 of 2 residents (R33, R43) reviewed for heart failure monitoring.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of a bed-hold at the time of transfer for two hospitalizations for 1 of 2 residents (R33) reviewed for hospitalization.
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 2 residents (R25, R48) reviewed for transmission of resident assessment.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 2 residents (R33, R43) reviewed for heart failure.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene for 2 of 4 staff observed for medication pass. Further, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 staff consistently followed infection control standards of practice for handling soiled clothing to reduce the risk of infection. This practice had the potential to affect all 57 residents, staff, and visitors.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal vaccine in a timely manner to 1 of 5 residents (R45) reviewed for immunizations.
October 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and document review, the facility failed to contact the resident's physician of missed administration of medication for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for medication errors. The missed administration of medication resulted in a critical low potassium level of 2.4 mmol/L (millimoles per liter) (normal range 3.5 - 5.1 mmol/L).
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure potassium was available, administered timely and administered as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 1 resident (R2). R2 missed 10 doses of potassium resulting in a critical low potassium level of 2.4 mmol/L (millimoles per liter) (normal range 3.5 - 5.1 mmol/L) requiring IV potassium. R2 was asymptomatic and stable.
July 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure infection control mitigation processes were timely and effectively implemented prior to, and during, facility demolition and renovations. In addition, the facility failed to hire a licensed, and certified contractor, to oversee the construction. This had the potential to impact all 51 residents within the facility.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services were provided to 1 of 1 resident (R1), whose severe environmental allergies were not adequately addressed to ensure she was comfortable and sufficiently protected from preventable allergy reactions. Additionally, when facility renovations were started, adequate barriers to prevent debris and chemical pollution from leaving the construction area were not maintained to protect R1.
January 24, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse timely (with in two hours) to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for allegations of physical abuse.
- C Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to have an updated policy on abuse reporting that addressed reporting all incidents of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation. This had the potential to affect all residents that reside at this facility.
October 26, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to have 8 hours of consecutive registered nursing coverage on a daily basis. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain temperature logs for refrigerators and food served. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.
- F Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit the payroll-based journal system (PB&J) staffing data to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the faciilty failed to notify the resident's physician of omitted medications, reason for medication omissions, and abnormal blood sugars for 1 of 2 residents (R44) reviewed for insulin.
Fire safety inspections
18 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 26, 2026, 7 on December 20, 2024, 9 on October 26, 2023.
Every fire safety citation18 citations
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- C Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Ensure that building systems meet requirements determined by risk assessment procedures performed by qualified personnel.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Have horizontal exits used in accordance with safety requirements.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 4, 2026 | Fine | $27,378 |
| December 20, 2024 | Fine | $70,618 |
| December 20, 2024 | Payment Denial | 5 days from January 31, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.71 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.69 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.30 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.27 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.0% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 58.3% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.50 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.88 on weekdays and 4.30 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.52 in April to June 2025 to 4.71 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.71 | 0.69 | 4.88 | 4.30 | 2.1% | 0 of 90 | 55 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.98 | 0.78 | 5.16 | 4.53 | 4.5% | 0 of 92 | 52 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.77 | 0.67 | 5.00 | 4.16 | 6.6% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.52 | 0.60 | 4.68 | 4.11 | 9.8% | 0 of 91 | 57 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.2 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 40.7 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.0 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.5 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.8 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MOTHER OF MERCY. CMS links this home to Benedictine Health System, a group of 23 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carley, Gerald | Corporate director | Individual | 01/22/1969 | |
| Knapp, Mark | Corporate director | Individual | 09/26/2012 | |
| Koop, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Paulsen, Ronald | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Peterson, Anneliese | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Tomczik, Paul | Corporate director | Individual | 09/23/2015 | |
| Vebelun, Edward | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Bergien, Tricia | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Rymanowski, Kevin | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Kuhn, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Lewis, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Benedictine Health System | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Kuhn, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2026 | |
| Lewis, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 15, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Cura of Melrose Melrose, 12.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Assumption Home Cold Spring, 14.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Sterling Park Health Care Center Waite Park, 18.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Country Manor Healthcare and Rehab Center Sartell, 18.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
- Good Shepherd Lutheran Home Sauk Rapids, 19.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Cura of Sauk Centre Sauk Centre, 19.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Cura of Paynesville Paynesville, 20.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Edenbrook of St. Cloud Saint Cloud, 22.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 35 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Benedictine Living Community Mother of Mercy's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Benedictine Living Community Mother of Mercy 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Benedictine Living Community Mother of Mercy get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 26, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Benedictine Living Community Mother of Mercy been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $97,996 in the last three years.
- Does Benedictine Living Community Mother of Mercy accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Benedictine Living Community Mother of Mercy?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Benedictine Health System. Legal business name: MOTHER OF MERCY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.