Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Waite Park

Sterling Park Health Care Center

142 North First Street, Waite Park, MN 56387 · Stearns County · (320) 252-9595

40 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245375 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 1, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 19 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.19 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.22 of those hours.

65.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

CMS links it to Accura Healthcare, an affiliated group of 41 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
0E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
August 1, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. J
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow process to ensure advanced directives were accurately documented and updated on the resident's electronic health record (EHR) banner, physician orders and Physician's Orders for Life Saving Treatment (POLST) which affected 2 of 16 residents (R35 and R19) reviewed for advance directives. These findings constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R35 and R19 who would not have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures (CPR) according to their wishes. The IJ began on [DATE], when R35's POLST, indicating R35's wishes for resuscitation was signed by the medical provider and it was not changed within the facility's EHR to reflect R35's wishes. This error was not identified despite multiple opportunities; [...]
  2. F
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on-site for at least 8 consecutive hours on a daily basis. Lack of consistent RN coverage may result in delayed assessment, clinical decision-making, or care interventions, potentially jeopardizing resident health and safety. This failure had the potential to negatively impact resident care and oversight.
  3. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure parameter mattress (a type of mattress cover, or encasement designed to create a gentle barrier around the edge of the bed, preventing falls) was not used in a manner to restrain resident while in bed for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for restraints.
  4. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a safe and orderly discharge was arranged for 1 of 2 residents (R40) who was discharged against medical advice (AMA). The facility did not complete a comprehensive discharge plan, or adequate documentation of efforts to educate the resident about the risks of leaving AMA. Findings Include: R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R40 had intact cognition and required minimal or limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R40's diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with other specified complication, major depressive disorder, hypertension, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, postprocedural; hypothyroidism, and hyperlipidemia. [...]
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R25) reviewed for care planning.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement interventions to ensure proper wheelchair positioning and prevent potential complications for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for wheelchair usage. Further, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's order for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for assessment prior to medication administration.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident for safe electric recliner usage for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for accidents.
  8. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices during meal service for 3 of 3 dining observations. Specifically, staff failed to intervene when a resident (R25) was observed touching the tops of other residents' coffee cups during meal service, creating a risk for cross-contamination and transmission of communicable diseases.
March 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to promptly notify a physician of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed when a right lower leg abscess worsened and required hospitalization.
February 26, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement treatment consistent to the resident's physician's orders and professional standards of practice, and revise interventions as appropriate for 1 of 3 residents (R1) when R1 was not sent sustenance with to his appointment.
May 2, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBase on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to store and label food properly, dispose of undated and expired food items, to reduce the risk of food borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 34 residents who were provided meals from the kitchen.
  2. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess residents for the ability to self-administer medications after staff set up, or obtain order for medication self-administration for 1 of 1 (R27) residents observed self-administering medication.
  3. D
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    F622 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure adequate and required information was documented and communicated to a receiving healthcare facility to ensure continuity of care when transferred emergently to a hospital setting for 1 of 1 residents (R38) reviewed for hospitalizations.
  4. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R38), or legal representative had been informed of bed hold rights at the time of hospitalization.
  5. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and documentation review the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and communication between the facility and the dialysis center for 1 of 1 resident (R27) receiving hemodialysis.
  6. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available to be administered as prescribed by the physician, for 1 of 1 residents (R27) reviewed for medication.
  7. C
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer or provide the pneumococcal vaccine for 1 of 5 (R26) residents reviewed for immunizations.
August 9, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices regarding disinfection of mechanical Hoyer lifts for 3 of 6 residents (R10, R12 and R22) who utilized a multiple-resident use lift. R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified that R10 was a total assist of two staff with transfers and required the use of a total body mechanical lift. R12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified that R12 was an extensive assist of two staff with transfers and required the use of a total body mechanical lift. R22's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified that R22 was an extensive assist of two staff with transfers and required the use of a total body mechanical lift. [...]
  2. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R13, R24 and R31) were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV20) in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations.

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on August 1, 2025, 1 on May 2, 2024.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · August 1, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
August 1, 2025Payment Denial 3 days from September 4, 2025

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.194.193.86
Registered nurses1.221.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.593.713.42
Nurse aides2.42
Licensed practical nurses0.55
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)65.3%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover69.2%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.43 on weekdays and 3.59 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.14 in April to June 2025 to 4.19 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.191.224.433.59 7.4%0 of 9036
Oct to Dec 20254.291.084.533.66 2.7%0 of 9234
Jul to Sep 20254.311.034.533.74 4.6%0 of 9235
Apr to Jun 20254.140.894.353.62 8.5%0 of 9136
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$19.39 to $23.7229,120
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.83 to $34.2612,840
Registered nurses$48.80$42.76 to $55.1770,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.618.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.11.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.02.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.04.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
41.320.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.25.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.117.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
35.123.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.414.812.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sterling Park Health Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

54.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

51.4% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: STERLING PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER INC. CMS links this home to Accura Healthcare, a group of 41 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Kaplan, Samual5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%03/04/2020
Parker, Bruce5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%03/04/2020
Kaplan, SamualCorporate directorIndividual03/04/2020
Parker, BruceCorporate directorIndividual03/04/2020
Leneave, TedCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2019
American Healthcare Management Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization10/01/2019
Hervin, CarolynOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2016
Leneave, TedOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/25/2022
Watkins, DouglasOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2024
Hervin, CarolynAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2016
Watkins, DouglasAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.59 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Sterling Park Health Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Sterling Park Health Care Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Sterling Park Health Care Center get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 1, 2025. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Sterling Park Health Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Sterling Park Health Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Sterling Park Health Care Center?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Accura Healthcare. Legal business name: STERLING PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection