Brookdale Galleria
2929 Post Oak Blvd, Houston, TX 77056 · Harris County · (713) 993-9999
56 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675834 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 19, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since February 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $73,120 in the last three years; the largest was $40,203, and the latest is dated March 23, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.62 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.09 of those hours.
65.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Healthpeak Properties, Inc., an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
March 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for adequate supervision. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 received adequate supervision when Resident #1 was able to exit the facility at 1:00am and found by staff on a busy street. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 3.20.2026. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator on 3.20.2026 at 5:48 p.m. On 3/21/26 at 8:15pm, the Administrator was notified that the IJ was removed; however, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not an immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. [...]
November 25, 2025Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents choices 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received orders for crushed medications as required after a speech therapy evaluation diagnosed him with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) on 09/03/25 until 10/30/25.- The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had orders to crush medications before administering crushed medications. This failure could result in resident's not receiving the care necessary, choking, and death.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. - The facility failed to accurately document Resident #1's dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) that required a modified diet and crushed medications in his diagnosis and MDS. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate assessments, which could compromise their plan of care .
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment describing services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preference for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for respiratory care. - The facility failed to ensure to change the water in Resident #1's oxygen concentrator (a machine that supplies concentrated oxygen) on 10/26/25 which resulted in the bottle being empty while the concentrator was in use and administering oxygen to the resident on 10/30/25. This failure could place residents at risk for dryness, irritation, nosebleeds, sore throats, thickened secretions, discomfort, and infection due to the dry oxygen.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) whose records were reviewed for resident identifiable records. - LVN A failed to document accurately when she documented a change of Resident #2's water used for her oxygen concentrator on 10/26/25 when she did not complete it. This failure could place residents at risk of having incomplete or inaccurate records and inadequate care.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the daily staffing was posted and readily accessible for review for 2 of 2 floors (1st floor and 2nd floor) reviewed for required postings. - On 10/30/25, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Associate Posting included the name of the facility and was displayed in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff and visitors by hanging it on the corner wall of the nursing station located on one end of the hall on the 1st and 2nd floor.- On 10/31/25, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Associate Posting on the 1st and 2nd floor included the resident census. This failure could affect residents, facility visitors, vendors, and emergency personnel by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding daily nursing staffing in a timely manner.
November 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. LVN C failed to remain in the room and monitor Resident #1's Family Member A administer medications to Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapy needed.
June 19, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for expired foods. The facility failed dispose of perishable foods after use in the walk-in fridge. This failure could place residents at risk for consuming hazardous expired food and developing foodborne illnesses who received food from the kitchen. Findings Included: Observation on 06/17/2025 at 10:48 AM revealed the following: *a bottle of Bay Leaves with use by date of 05/31/2025. * a package of Pork with use by date of 06/14/2025; *a package of Beef with use by date of 06/15/2025; *a package of Beef Tips with use by date of 06/10/2025; *a package of Brisket with use by date of 06/03/2025; and *a container of Chocolate Fudge Icing with use by date of 04/27/2025. [...]
December 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wound care received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing, in that: - The facility failed to identify a healed area to Resident #1's sacrum which included a scab and pink skin when Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Appropriate interventions were not implemented for Resident #1 and the area developed into a pressure ulcer within approximately 12 days of admission and eventually developed into a Stage IV pressure ulcer. - CNA B stated she did not reposition the resident frequently enough while working with Resident #1 upon her first few days admission. This failure placed residents with low skin integrity at risk for skin breakdown or failure of wounds to heal.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for infection. -The facility failed to ensure RN B performed hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #1. This failure could lead to the spread of infection to residents.
April 24, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for resident assessments was assessed using the quarterly review instrument not less frequently than once every 3 months, in that: - Resident #4's EHR showed her quarterly MDS assessment was due for completion by 4/10/2024 but was not done by time of record review on 04/24/2024. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate care.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of 6 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. -The facility failed to administer the medication Esomeprazole (used to treat stomach acid related conditions) to Resident #8 on 04/21/2024, 04/22/2024 and 04/23/2024 as physician ordered. This failure could place residents receiving medication at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes and discomfort.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7 % based on 2 errors out of 28 opportunities, which involved 2 of 6 residents (Resident #8, Resident #42) reviewed for medication errors. 1-LVN A failed to administer medications as physician ordered to Resident #8 as by not administering Esomeprazole Magnesium delayed release 40mg on 04/23/2024. The original order for Esomeprazole 40mg twice a day was dated 3/13/2024. The order status was on hold because the medication was out of stock on 04/23/2024. 2-LVN B failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #42 as by administering Vitamin B12 with Folate instead of the physician order for Vitamin B12 without folate on 4/23/2024. [...]
April 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- K Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed immediately consult with the resident's physician when there is a significant change in the resident's physical status for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed physician notification. Facility staff identified sacral wound on Resident #1 on 2/16/2024 and facility staff failed to perform and document a wound assessment, notify the physician, and obtain wound care orders until 4 days later 2/20/2024. An IJ was identified on 4/1/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 4/2/2024 at 4:14pm. The Immediate jeopardy was removed on 4/4/2024 due to the facilities implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance. This failure could affect residents with impaired skin integrity and residents at risk for impaired skin integrity of developing life threatening infections, hospitalization, and worsening pressure ulcers.
- K Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident reviewed for pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents. 1. Facility staff identified sacral wound on Resident #1 on 2/16/2024 and facility staff failed to perform and document a wound assessment, notify the physician, and obtain wound care orders until 4 days later on 2/20/2024. Wound Care Physician assessed Resident #1 on 2/22/2024 and diagnosed Resident #1 with an unstageable (Due to Necroses) Sacrum Full Thickness pressure wound with a surface area of 129.72 cm. 2. Facility staff were performing dressing changes without a physician's order. An IJ was identified on 4/1/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 4/2/2024 at 4:14pm. [...]
January 24, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's choices 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. -The facility failed to enter orders for blood sugar monitoring for Resident #1, who had type 2 diabetes, upon admission and as a result the resident's blood sugar was not assessed for over 22 hrs. (01/17/24 at 02:50 PM to 01/18/24 at 01:11 PM) after admission. This failure could place residents at risk of delayed identification/treatment of acute health conditions and hospitalization. Findings Include: [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. - The facility failed to acquire and administer antibiotics antidiabetic medications timely to Resident #1 upon admission resulting in the resident's blood sugar level at 311 mg/dL. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their diseases treated, adverse events and hospitalization. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 01/23/24 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: left hip fracture, overactive bladder, high cholesterol, difficulty swallowing and type 2 diabetes. Resident #1 transferred to facility after a hospital stay from 01/04/24 to 01/17/24. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for resident identifiable records. - The facility failed to completely and accurately document administration of medication to Resident #1 by documenting administration of Insulin Lispro that was not in the facility and did not occur, This failure could place residents at risk of having incomplete or inaccurate records and inadequate care. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 01/23/24 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: left hip fracture, overactive bladder, high cholesterol, difficulty swallowing and type 2 diabetes. [...]
December 11, 2023Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- H Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent ulcers from developing for 1 (Resident #2) of 11 residents reviewed for treatment of pressure ulcer. -The facility failed to provide treatment in a timely manner for Resident #2 who experienced a decrease in skin integrity to the sacral region that resulted in an unstageable wound to the sacral region diagnosed by the wound care doctor on 12/1/23. -The facility failed to do consistent weekly skin assessments on Resident #2. -Facility failed to change Resident #2's dressing to sacrum on 12/06/2023 as ordered by the wound care doctor. [...]
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 (Resident #2, #4) of 11 residents reviewed for care plans. -The facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Residents #2 and Resident #4 to address indwelling Foley Catheters. This failure placed residents at risk for infections, injury, privacy, dignity, and decrease in quality of life.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to personal privacy including medical treatment for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #4) of 11 reviewed for respect and dignity. -The facility failed to place Resident #1's Foley Cather bag inside of a privacy bag on 12/07/23. -The facility failed to place Resident #4's Foley Cather bag inside of a privacy bag on 12/09/23. This failure placed residents at risk of embarrassment and lower self-esteem.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 1 (Resident #1) of 11 residents reviewed for infection control. -Resident #1 indwelling Foley catheter bag was observed on the floor underneath Resident #1's bed on 12/07/23. This failure placed resident at risk for infections and decrease quality of life.
February 23, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received the necessary treatment and services, to promote healing and prevent infection for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #105) reviewed for pressure ulcer in that: -Facility staff failed to follow up with Wound Care Doctor's recommendation for left lateral forefoot/left medial foot wound care for Resident #105. This failure could place residents with wounds or who are at risk of developing wounds placing them at risk of infection, a decline in health, pain, and hospitalization.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #105) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. -The facility staff failed to stop a wound care treatment and provide Resident #105 with pain reduction care when the resident cried and yelled out from pain he experienced during the wound care treatment. This failure placed residents who received pain medications at risk for unmanaged pain during treatments.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medications in that: -The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 did not have medications clotrimazole cream 1% (a medicated antifungal skin cream. It treats certain kinds of skin fungal or yeast infections) and zinc oxide ointment (a medicated ointment that treats or prevents skin irritation like cuts, burns or diaper rash) in her room. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk for medication diversion, being administered the wrong medication, injury, and hospitalization.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #105) reviewed for infection control, in that: -The facility failed to ensure LVN A performed hand hygiene when moving from a dirty to clean site, while performing Resident #105's wound care. This failure could place residents at risk for or infections.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 19, 2025, 3 on April 24, 2024, 2 on February 23, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- F Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 23, 2026 | Fine | $10,631 |
| December 17, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
| April 4, 2024 | Fine | $40,203 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $12,253 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.62 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.09 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.91 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.41 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.4% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 81.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.90 on weekdays and 3.91 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.72 in April to June 2025 to 4.62 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.62 | 1.09 | 4.90 | 3.91 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 42 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.55 | 1.02 | 4.75 | 4.01 | 2.0% | 2 of 92 | 43 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.93 | 0.52 | 3.06 | 2.57 | 0.0% | 30 of 92 | 48 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.72 | 0.81 | 4.83 | 4.43 | 0.4% | 0 of 91 | 43 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.8 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.4 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: S-H OPCO GALLERIA, LLC. CMS links this home to Healthpeak Properties, Inc., a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sh Opco Holdco LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| CCRC Propco Ventures, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp Ma3 Gp Holding, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp Ma3, LP | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp Partners LP | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp S-H 2014 Member LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp Ventures II Trs LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp/Ls 2011 Reit, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Healthpeak Op LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Janus Living Op LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Janus Living Trs LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Janus Living, Inc. | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Janus Member, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Ocean Acquisition I LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Cheng, Patrick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Russo, Frank | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Cheng, Patrick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Harris Bates, Lashon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/05/2026 | |
| Johnston, Shawn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/17/2019 | |
| Rajan, Kavitha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/05/2026 | |
| Russo, Frank | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/17/2019 | |
| Kussow, Dawn | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/19/2026 | |
| Mabry, Adam | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/19/2026 | |
| Stengle, Nikolas | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/19/2026 | |
| White, Chadwick | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/19/2026 | |
| Bkd Twenty-One Management Company Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/06/2026 | |
| CCRC Propco Ventures, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp Ma3, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp Partners LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp S-H 2014 Member LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp Ventures II Member LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/13/2026 | |
| Hcp Ventures II Partner LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Hcp/Ls 2011 Reit, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Healthpeak Op LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/13/2026 | |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/13/2026 | |
| Janus Living Op LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Janus Member, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| Lbmc PC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Ocean Acquisition I LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2026 | |
| S-H Propco Galleria LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2016 | |
| Walters Financial Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/06/2026 | |
| Harris Bates, Lashon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/19/2026 | |
| Rajan, Kavitha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/19/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on March 23, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 25, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 18, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 17, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Hallmark Houston, 0.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Woodway Nursing & Rehab Houston, 2.6 mi · not rated · 55 citations
- The Vosswood Nursing Center Houston, 2.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- Ffiii Houston SNF Tenant LLC Houston, 3.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Bayou Manor Houston, 3.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center Houston, 3.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Clarewood House Extended Care Center Houston, 3.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- The Methodist Hospital SNF Houston, 4.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Brookdale Galleria's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Brookdale Galleria 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Brookdale Galleria get at its last inspection?
- 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on June 19, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Brookdale Galleria been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 4 fines totaling $73,120 in the last three years.
- Does Brookdale Galleria accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns Brookdale Galleria?
- CMS lists 43 owners and managers, and links the home to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.. Legal business name: S-H OPCO GALLERIA, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.