Find a nursing home

Home / North Carolina / Hayesville

Clay County Health and Rehabilitation

86 Valley Hideaway Drive, Hayesville, NC 28904 · Clay County · (828) 389-9941

90 certified beds, about 78 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345433 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 1, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 17 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.17 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.

49.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).

CMS links it to Avardis Health, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
5E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
May 1, 2026Standard inspection · 11 citations
  1. F
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    F882 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility.
  2. E
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, Pharmacist, and Medical Director interview, the facility failed to transcribe and implement orders for diabetes care according to the hospital discharge summary for a resident with diabetes. Additionally, the facility failed to transcribe and implement orders for the same resident's Coreg (used to treat heart failure and hypertension) according to the hospital discharge summary. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #23).
  3. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff and Registered Dietitian (RD) interviews, the facility failed to follow Registered Dietitian recommendations for nutritional supplement for a resident with significant weight loss for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #44).
  4. D
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    F711 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician visit included a plan to address an abnormal low thyroid laboratory test from the hospital discharge summary. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for physician visits (Resident # 1).
  5. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews with staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and Consultant Pharmacist Supervisor, the Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify irregularities regarding laboratory monitoring for 1 of 1 resident with a diagnosis of diabetes reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident #12).
  6. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff, Physician, Consultant Pharmacist, and Consultant Pharmacist Supervisor interviews, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for medication management was completed as recommended by the medical provider for 1 of 6 resident with a diagnosis of diabetes reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #12).
  7. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired medication from the medication room for 1 of 1 medication room observed for medication storage and labeling. Additionally, the facility failed to keep unattended medications in a secured medication cart for 1 of 4 medication carts (300-hall medication cart) observed for medication storage.
  8. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedures for glucometer disinfection, standard precautions, and hand hygiene when Medication Aide #1 failed to disinfect Resident #23's assigned glucometer after performing a capillary blood glucose (CBG) test. Additionally, Medication Aide #1 failed to wear gloves when she performed the CBG test and failed to perform hand hygiene before and after performing the CBG test. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 glucometer infection control observations and 1 of 3 hand hygiene observations (Medication Aide #1).
  9. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to document a resident or Responsible Party (RP) were provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal immunization or if the resident received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive it due to a medical contradiction or refusal. In addition, there was no documentation the resident was offered the pneumococcal immunization. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #6).
  10. D
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    F887 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for eligibility and ensure a resident was offered the COVID-19 vaccination for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #6).
  11. B
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    F712 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · deficient, provider has May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were performed at least once every sixty days for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for physician visits (Residents #62, #44 and #9). 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, dementia and diabetes. Resident #62's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living. A review of Resident #62's electronic health record revealed a Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note dated 12/18/25 and a Physician's annual wellness visit dated 3/31/26. No further documentation was found to show the Physician or NP had visited or assessed the resident between 12/18/25 and 3/31/26. [...]
February 27, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in the areas of bed rails and diagnoses for 7 of 12 sampled residents reviewed for physical restraints, respiratory care and unnecessary medications (Residents #1, #51, #63, #13, #65, #24, and #47).
  2. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete Care Area Assessments (CAA) comprehensively to address the underlying causes and contributing factors of the triggered areas for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and unnecessary medications (Residents #46 and #51). Findings Included: a. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, stroke and end-stage renal disease. Review of Section V (CAA Summary) from the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the care area for pressure ulcer triggered for Resident #46. The MDS Coordinator who completed the assessment did not provide any information in the analysis of findings that described the nature of Resident #46's problem, possible causes, contributing factors, and risk factors for the triggered care area. [...]
  3. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to complete bed rail assessments to determine the need for bed rail use for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1, #51 and #13). Findings Included: 1. a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of falling, generalized muscle weakness and left shoulder pain. Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record on 02/26/25 revealed the last completed bed rail assessment was dated 11/08/23. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had intact cognition and required substantial/maximum assistance with bed mobility. During an observation and interview on 02/25/25 at 9:15 AM, quarter bed rails were observed in the upright position on each side of Resident #1's bed. [...]
October 26, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews with the resident, staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and the Medical Director (MD), the Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify drug irregularities and provide recommendations for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for diabetes management (Resident #39).
  2. E
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews with the resident, staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and the Medical Director (MD), the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors when 5 nurses failed to follow the physician's parameter as ordered during insulin administration. As a result, Resident #39 had received 2 doses or unnecessary Humalog insulin and her insulin had been held against the parameter 17 times within 112 days. This affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for diabetes management (Resident #39).
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy when Nurse #1 did not perform hand hygiene after removing soiled dressings with drainage and before donning new gloves to cleanse the wound for 3 of 5 wound care observations on 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #53 and Resident #33).

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 1, 2026, 2 on February 27, 2025, 1 on October 26, 2023.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · May 1, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  2. F
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · May 1, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  3. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · May 1, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  4. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 1, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  5. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 1, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  6. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · May 1, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  7. D
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · February 27, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · February 27, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · October 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth CarolinaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.173.853.86
Registered nurses0.390.620.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.873.423.42
Nurse aides2.26
Licensed practical nurses0.52
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)49.4%49.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover66.7%45.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.29 on weekdays and 2.87 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.60 in April to June 2025 to 3.17 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.170.393.292.87 0.0%0 of 9078
Oct to Dec 20253.280.523.462.83 0.0%0 of 9280
Jul to Sep 20253.160.563.252.92 0.0%0 of 9276
Apr to Jun 20253.600.683.793.12 0.0%1 of 9175
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Carolina, Jan to Mar 20263.650.533.823.258.0%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth CarolinaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.015.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.90.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.72.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.73.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.118.314.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.55.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.714.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.922.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.712.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.01.81.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: 86 VALLEY HIDEAWAY DRIVE OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Avardis Health, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Hayesville Parentco LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
Evh Holdco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
Ncop Holdco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
Nu C II Irrevocable TrustIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
Nu C Irrevocable TrustIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
SNF Care Centers LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
Zenith Holdco II LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
Zenith Holdco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/01/2025
Semones, BrandiManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/01/2025
SNF Mgr LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization05/01/2025
Chandross, MarkOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2025
Garrett, KathieOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2025
Jones, TequillaOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2025
Semones, BrandiOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2025
Vargas, CarlosOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2025
SNF Mgr LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/14/2025
Chandross, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2025
Garrett, KathieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2025
Hoback, TiffanyAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2025
Jones, TequillaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2025
Semones, BrandiAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2025
Vargas, CarlosAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 1, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 1, 2026: "Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 1, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
  4. How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 1, 2026: "Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.87 hours per resident per day, below the North Carolina average of 3.42.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

North Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Clay County Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Clay County Health and Rehabilitation 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Clay County Health and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 1, 2026. The North Carolina average is 4.7.
Has Clay County Health and Rehabilitation been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Clay County Health and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Clay County Health and Rehabilitation?
CMS lists 24 owners and managers, and links the home to Avardis Health. Legal business name: 86 VALLEY HIDEAWAY DRIVE OPCO LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection