Find a nursing home

Home / California / Gardena

Clear View Sanitarium

15823 So. Western Ave., Gardena, CA 90247 · Los Angeles County · (310) 538-2323

73 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555881 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.29 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.

31.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
February 27, 2026Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation were practiced in the kitchen when:1 dented can of pineapple chunks was mixed with regular non-dented cans in the dry storage area.6 cups of 8 ounces ([oz.] small unit of weight measurement) of thickened water and 1 cup of 8 oz of orange juice was on the tray with no use by date label. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) for 70 out of 70 residents who received food from the kitchen.
  2. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge contained the required content elements for one of three sampled residents (Resident 75). The deficient practice had the potential to compromise the resident's due process rights related to discharge.
  3. D
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly (every 3 months) Minimum Data Set Assessment ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4) was completed within the required timeframe. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a billing error and inaccurate data on Resident 4's care needs.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) assessment was completed accurately for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 3) by failing to ensure Resident 3's use of antibiotic (a drug used to treat infections) was encoded in the recent MDS assessment. This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Resident 3.
  5. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASARR] - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level 1 screening (a mandatory preliminary screening required for all individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility) was completed and re-submitted for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 not being appropriately identified for further evaluation of serious mental illness leading to resident not receiving necessary specialized services, treatment planning interventions, or appropriate placement.
  6. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented to ensure a dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluid artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) emergency kit (E-KIT - supplies to help meet the needs of a dialysis resident in the event of an emergency) was always available at bedside for one of one sampled resident (Resident 8). This deficient practice has the potential to result in staff's inability to manage and control the bleeding from Resident 8's dialysis access site in the event of an emergency.
  7. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to review, update, and revise the care plan to address the use of bolster pads (a soft barrier along the edges of the bed, reducing the risk of rolling out of bed) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This deficient practice has the potential to affect the delivery of necessary care, treatment, and services for Resident 1.
  8. B
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the trash dumpsters was closed and not overfilled. This deficient practice has the potential for harboring and feeding of pests.
November 15, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) assessment was resubmitted for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 57). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care and mental health services.
  2. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 30 was not prescribed Seroquel (an anti-psychotic medication used to treat mental illness) to control dementia (condition where there is a decline in mental abilities and memory) symptoms. This deficient practice put Resident 30 at risk of an adverse reaction (bad outcome) from taking an anti-psychotic without a diagnosis of a mental illness.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that the medication storage room had a room thermometer that was monitored, and the readings recorded in a room temperature log to ensure a safe temperature range for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to residents due to the potential loss of strength of the drugs, and the potential for the residents to receive ineffective drug dosages.
  4. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the walk-in refrigerator did not contain a spoiled bag of cilantro. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness (sickness from eating food with harmful bacteria) for any resident consuming the cilantro.
  5. D
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the dumpsters were kept closed and all trash was contained. This deficient practice had the potential to attract rodents to the trash area.
November 9, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 16, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use one unopened browned turkey breast before its use fresh or freeze by date on 10/6/2023 or throw it after the safe time limit of 14 days of thawing (a process of taking a frozen product from frozen to unfrozen state) and refrigeration storage time on 11/1/2023 in the walk-in refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in dietary staff serving the browned turkey breast to residents and cause spoiled or unsafely stored food symptoms of vomiting and diarrhea to residents.

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 27, 2026.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 27, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · February 27, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.294.523.86
Registered nurses0.440.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.884.093.42
Nurse aides3.14
Licensed practical nurses0.71
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)31.5%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover37.5%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 2.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.46 on weekdays and 3.88 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.27 in April to June 2025 to 4.29 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.290.444.463.88 0.1%0 of 9071
Oct to Dec 20254.350.414.513.96 0.1%0 of 9269
Jul to Sep 20254.350.404.533.89 0.1%0 of 9270
Apr to Jun 20254.270.444.403.95 0.5%0 of 9170
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.310.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.30.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.11.63.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.19.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
36.812.015.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.22.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.61.61.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CLEAR VIEW SANITARIUM, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Towns, Jeffrey5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%06/11/2011
Towns, Mark5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%06/11/2011
Towns, JeffreyCorporate directorIndividual06/11/2011
Towns, MarkCorporate directorIndividual06/11/2011
Towns, JeffreyCorporate officerIndividual06/11/2011
Towns, MarkCorporate officerIndividual06/11/2011
Arora, NidhiOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/11/2014
Badillo, JoseOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/05/1981
Cerna, LucreciaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/25/1988
Grijalva, MauricioOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/18/1998
Kooner, SandeepOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/1999
Morris, MichelleOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2005
Soliman, FlordelizaOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/30/1992
Sum, SotheavyOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2010
Towns, JeffreyOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/11/2011
Towns, MarkOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/11/2011
Young, HardingOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2020
Arora, NidhiAdp of the SNFIndividual03/11/2014
Badillo, JoseAdp of the SNFIndividual01/05/1981
Cerna, LucreciaAdp of the SNFIndividual07/25/1988
Grijalva, MauricioAdp of the SNFIndividual05/18/1998
Kooner, SandeepAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/1999
Morris, MichelleAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2005
Soliman, FlordelizaAdp of the SNFIndividual11/30/1992
Sum, SotheavyAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2010
Towns, JeffreyAdp of the SNFIndividual06/11/2011
Towns, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual06/11/2011
Young, HardingAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on February 27, 2026: "Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 27, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 15, 2024: "Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on February 27, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.88 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.

Other nursing homes nearby

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Clear View Sanitarium's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Clear View Sanitarium 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Clear View Sanitarium get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 27, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
Has Clear View Sanitarium been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Clear View Sanitarium accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Clear View Sanitarium?
CMS lists 28 owners and managers. Legal business name: CLEAR VIEW SANITARIUM, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection