Home / New Jersey / Burlington
Complete Care at Marcella
2305 Rancocas Road, Burlington, NJ 08016 · Burlington County · (609) 387-9300
150 certified beds, about 143 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315330 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 24, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 16 health citations since August 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $62,666 in the last three years; the largest was $62,666, and the latest is dated May 12, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
36.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
CMS links it to Complete Care, an affiliated group of 85 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
May 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteComplaint #3001244 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 5/6/26, 5/7/26 and 5/12/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment and to provide adequate supervision for a resident (Resident #2) who was assessed to have poor safety awareness, impaired cognition, and was identified as an elopement and fall risk. Resident #2 was also identified having a history of fall and required supervision with ambulation (walking). The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: The facility policy titled: Fall Prevention Program, with a revised date of 10/7/25, revealed that residents would receive individualized care that would minimize their risk of falls, and that interventions will be monitored for effectiveness. [...]
July 24, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteComplaint # 185832, 186185 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications within the scheduled medication administration times. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident # 12, # 159) reviewed for significant medication errors. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 07/16/2025 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 12 in bed in their room. At that time, he/she declined to be interviewed due to experiencing pain. The resident displayed facial grimacing as he/she spoke. A review of Resident # 12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under Orders revealed that Resident # 12 was prescribed Morphine Sulfate (medication used to treat pain) ER (Extended Release) 15 milligrams (mg) tablet to be given one time a day for Chronic Pain. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for the handling and storage of respiratory equipment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #92). On 7/16/2025 at 10:06 AM, during rounds the surveyor observed Resident #92 laying in bed in their room with the nasal cannula (a tube used to deliver oxygen through the nose). The tube was labeled 7/13/2025 and coiled directly on top of the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that delivers extra oxygen to the resident). The tube was not in a bag and exposed to air. On 7/17/2025 at 9:04 AM, during rounds the surveyor observed Resident #92 lying flat in bed. [...]
January 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ00180123 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 1/21/2025 it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently document in the Documentation Survey Report (DSR) the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to the residents and to follow the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) job description and follow its policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed for ADL documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: moderate protein calorie malnutrition; muscle weakness (generalized); [...]
June 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteCOMPLAINT #NJ00174308 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 06/07/24, it was determined that the facility failed to perform skin scrapings to confirm the presence of scabies (an infestation of the skin by a human itch mite). The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4) sampled and was evidenced by the following: During a review of Resident #1's electronic medical record (EMR), a physician note, dated 02/22/24, at 08:53 A.M. revealed that one of the resident's chief complaints included a rash that had developed across his/her lower extremities, trunk and back. The note further revealed that Ivermectin (an oral medication effective in treating scabies) was ordered for Scabies. [...]
November 21, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/13/23 from 09:25 AM until 10:35 AM the surveyor, who were accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. A Food Service Worker (FSW) was observed with a hairnet on with the hair near her ears exposed. Another FSW was observed with a surgical mask on his face. His facial hair was exposed. The FSD stated that hairnets should cover all hair. He also stated that the FSW should be wearing a beard guard. 2. In the snack refrigerator there were five individual cartons of commercially prepared vanilla shakes with no use by date. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility records, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure infection control practices were adhered to in a manner that would decrease the possibility of the spread of infection during wound care, and b.) medication administration. This deficient practice was observed with 1 of 2 residents (Resident# 5) reviewed for pressure ulcers, and for 1 of 2 nurses observed during the medication observation pass on 1 of 3 nursing units, (Second Floor). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a.) On 11/13/23 at 10:32 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #5 resting in bed in their room. On the wall outside of the resident's room door was an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign and a plastic bin with three drawers containing disposable gloves and disposable gowns. [...]
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an appropriately sized bed for 1 of 28 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for accommodation of needs and was evidenced by the following: On 11/13/23 at 11:10 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #44 resting in bed in their room. The resident was laying diagonally in bed, had both knees bent to keep their legs and feet on the mattress. The resident's feet were up against the foot board while the resident's head was propped on a pillow extending past the edge of the mattress. Resident #44 informed the surveyor that their legs hurt from being bent and that he/she is seven feet tall and in a short bed and is uncomfortable. [...]
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for smoking. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/13/23 at 10:23 AM, during the tour of the facility, Resident #63 was identified by the Licensed Practical Nurse/Nurse Manager LPN/UM as a smoker. At that time the surveyor observed Resident #63 ambulating in his/her room. The resident stated that he/she went out to smoke four to five times a day. The surveyor reviewed the admission Record for Resident #63 which reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included diabetes (high blood sugar) and depression. [...]
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for a fall risk resident within 48 hours of admission to a facility. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 28 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #185) and was evidenced by the following: On 11/13/23 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed facility documentation which revealed the resident left the facility against medical advice (AMA) on 03/07/23. Review of the admission Record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to heart failure, diabetes (high blood sugar), difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. [...]
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to 1. Obtain physician orders to change oxygen tubing on a resident who was ordered nasal cannula (a devices that delivers oxygen through a tube into the nose) oxygen and 2. Obtain physician orders for care of a Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (tube passed through abdominal wall into the stomach to provide a means of feeding) site for a resident. This was identified in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PEG tubes (Resident #61) and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen (Resident #31 ) and was identified by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of medical records (MR) and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with the medication's cautionary statement, and manufacturer specifications. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 nurses who administered medications to 2 of 4 (Residents #27 and #98) observed during medication pass and was evidenced by the following: On 11/15/2023 at 08:18 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Professional Nurse (LPN) #1 who prepared seven medications, which included Potassium Chloride ER (extended release) tablet 10 Milliequivalents (meq) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypokalemia (deficiency of potassium in blood stream), for Resident #27. [...]
August 11, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 08/06/2021 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #44 lying in bed. With the resident's permission, the resident pulled the blankets off his/her feet to reveal he/she was wearing non-skid socks and his/her heels were resting directly on the mattress. There was no pillow or offloading device in the vicinity of the foot of the bed. On 08/09/2021 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #44 lying in bed. With the resident's permission, the resident pulled the blankets off his/her feet to reveal he/she was wearing non-skid socks and his/her heels were resting directly on the mattress. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 nurses, on 1 of 2 units (Unit 3), who administered medication to 1 of 5 residents. There were 2 medication errors out of 31 medication opportunities (Resident #50), which resulted in a medication error rate of 6%. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/06/2021 at 8:40 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administer medications to Resident #50. The LPN dispensed seven oral (by mouth) medications, including a Biotin 5,000 mcg (microgram) capsule and one Gabapentin 100 mg (milligram) capsule. The LPN recorded the medications were administered in the electronic Medical Administration Record (eMAR). [...]
- B Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care for residents, for Resident #8. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment and was evidenced by the following: A review of the MDS section of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident #8 revealed that the Quarterly MDS on 03/30/21 was in progress. The facility provided the Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) Submission Final Validation Report, dated 04/07/21, revealed that the 03/30/21 Quarterly MDS was completed. The EMR did not reflect that the facility initiated the Annual Comprehensive Assessment as the next MDS assessment. [...]
- B Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care for residents, for Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10 and #11. This deficient practice was identified for 10 of 11 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment and was evidenced by the following: A review of the MDS section of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident #1 revealed that the Quarterly MDS on 03/22/21 was in progress. The facility provided the Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) Submission Final Validation Report, dated 04/05/21, that revealed the 03/22/21 Quarterly MDS was completed. The EMR did not reflect that the facility initiated the next quarterly MDS assessment. [...]
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 24, 2025, 1 on November 21, 2023, 3 on August 11, 2021.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
- E Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | Fine | $62,666 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.14 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.11 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.3% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.74 on weekdays and 3.14 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.52 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.39 | 3.74 | 3.14 | 7.9% | 0 of 90 | 143 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.50 | 0.32 | 3.66 | 3.10 | 5.9% | 0 of 92 | 143 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.51 | 0.42 | 3.67 | 3.09 | 7.6% | 0 of 92 | 142 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.52 | 0.33 | 3.65 | 3.18 | 9.2% | 0 of 91 | 139 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.9 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.8 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: COMPLETE CARE AT MARCELLA LLC. CMS links this home to Complete Care, a group of 85 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC Nj1 Opcos LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2021 |
| PC Wta Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Sms 2021 Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Stein, Shalom | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Hoch, Robert | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Stein, Shalom | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Stein, Shalom | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Hoch, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Kaufman, Chaim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Mercado, Wanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Rosenzweig, Alan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Solarz, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Stein, Shalom | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II Co-Borrower, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II Mezz Borrower, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Aurora Guardian Holdco II, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Aurora Guardian II Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Aurora Guardian Partners II LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| J & R Family Investments, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| L Friedman 2018 Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| L Friedman Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Landau Family Investment Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| M Friedman 2018 Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Marcella Center Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| PC Wta Acquisition LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| PC Wta Multi-State LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Peace Capital Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| R&j Family Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Sms 2021 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Hepner-Elcheck, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Kaufman, Chaim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Mercado, Wanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Rosenzweig, Alan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Solarz, Jeffrey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 21, 2025: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 12, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.14 hours per resident per day, below the New Jersey average of 3.50.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Complete Care at Burlington Woods, LLC Burlington, 0.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Masonic Village at Burlington Burlington, 1.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Bristol Health & Rehab Center Bristol, 4.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Lumberton, 4.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Careone at Moorestown Moorestown, 5.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Total Rehab Moorestown Moorestown, 6.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at Evergreens Moorestown, 6.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Moorestown, 6.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 25 citations
New Jersey contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: New Jersey Department of Health, Health Facilities, License Surveys and Inspections, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: New Jersey Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-877-582-6995. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: New Jersey Long Term Care Facilities Search, where New Jersey publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Complete Care at Marcella's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Complete Care at Marcella 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Complete Care at Marcella get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 24, 2025. The New Jersey average is 8.6.
- Has Complete Care at Marcella been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $62,666 in the last three years.
- Does Complete Care at Marcella accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Complete Care at Marcella?
- CMS lists 34 owners and managers, and links the home to Complete Care. Legal business name: COMPLETE CARE AT MARCELLA LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.