Home / New Jersey / Moorestown
255 East Main St., Moorestown, NJ 08057 · Burlington County · (856) 235-1214
201 certified beds, about 157 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315201 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 5, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since September 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.30 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.51 of those hours.
52.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was followed and communicated to all facility staff to prevent falls. Resident #2 fell and sustained head trauma with a laceration to the head with active bleeding which required transferring Resident #2 to the hospital. This deficient practice was identified for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and incidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 11/6/25 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #2's closed electronic Medical Record (EMR). A review of the Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted to identify the causal factor of a fall for a severely cognitively impaired resident who was found lying on the floor in a pool of blood, that resulted in a hematoma and laceration to the head, and required emergent transfer to the hospital on 9/5/25. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and incidents, and was evidenced by the following:On 11/6/25 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record (Electronic and Paper) for Resident #2. According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to treat and manage a resident's pain consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain and was evidenced by the following:A review of the resident admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing difficulty) and osteoporosis (causes bones to become thinner, weaker and more likely to fracture). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 7/25/2025 from 09:49 AM to 10:14 AM the surveyor accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen:1. In the walk-in freezer a frozen lasagna was wrapped in plastic wrap with a use by date of 7/25/25. When asked if lasagna should be used, the FSD replied No, I'm going to take it out right now. The expired food was removed by FSD.2. In the walk-in refrigerator a container of chicken noodle soup wrapped in plastic wrap with a use by date of 7/28/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, the facility failed to ensure that food brought to residents by family and other visitors were stored, handled, and consumed in a safe and sanitary manner. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 6 residents (Resident # 9, Resident # 13, Resident # 26 and Resident # 51) who had personal refrigerators in their bedrooms. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 07/31/2025 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident # 26's personal refrigerator, located in room [ROOM NUMBER]-W temperature log had not been filled out since July 18th. On 07/31/2025 at 10:24AM, the surveyor observed that Resident # 9's personal refrigerator, located in room [ROOM NUMBER]-W, was missing temperature log entries for the whole month of July. [...]
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of Resident # 14's admissions record revealed that, Resident # 14 was admitted with but not limited to Heart Failure, and Peripheral Vascular Disease (a condition in which narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the arms or legs). A review of Resident #14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 06/27/2025 revealed under section N that the resident was ordered an anticoagulant (a medication that helps thin the blood). A review of Resident #14's Electronical Medical Record revealed a physician's order with a state date of 05/26/2025 for apixaban (a medication that helps thin the blood) 5 milligrams to be given every twelve hours. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living specifically by not turning the resident in bed every two hours to prevent skin deterioration. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 179, 152) investigated for Activities of Daily Living. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 179’s Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 9/15/2024 revealed under section “GG” that he/she has lower extremity impairment on both sides. Further, the MDS revealed under section, “M” that he/she is at risk of pressure ulcers/injury. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that facility to failed to ensure residents received the appropriate pain management by administering pain medications according to the physician's ordered pain level parameters. This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pain (Resident #7 and #49) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/29/2025 at 10:47 AM, during the initial tour Resident #7 was in the room in bed. The resident's left leg was elevated on pillows and the resident appeared comfortable to the surveyor. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #7. A review of the Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to; fracture of the lower extremity, diabetes (high blood sugar), and depressive disorder. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint # NJ00172812Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide access to the call system while a resident was in bed. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 residents investigated under the Environment Task. (Resident # 2 and Resident # 77)On 07/29/2025 at 10:29 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident # 2 asleep in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call device on the floor adjacent to the bed. On the same date at 10:37 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 77 awake in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call device on the floor adjacent to the bed. On 07/30/2025 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 77 wake in bed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed a.) conduct quarterly Interdisciplinary Care Plan (ICP) meetings and b.) to consistently maintain documentation showing that the resident's representative (RR) was invited or attended ICP meetings in accordance with the facility practice and policy. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of 36 residents (Resident #67, #81) reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: On 01/22/23 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the admission Record (AR) for Resident # 67 which reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but was not limited to dementia with mood disturbances, major depressive disorder, recurrent and cognitive communication deficit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's environment, equipment and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of four (4) units ([NAME] Glen) was evidenced by the following: The surveyor conducted a tour of the [NAME] Glen Unit on 1/10/24 at 9:52 AM. The surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM #1) who explained that the [NAME] Glen Unit was comprised of dementia (cognitively impaired) residents and some residents that had behavioral disturbances related to dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint NJ#: 165482 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility-provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents in a timely manner for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #65, #84, #89) observed for incontinence care on 1 of 2 units ([NAME] Glen and Laurel Creek units) and b.) provide nail care to a resident who required extensive assistance from the staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #114) reviewed for ADLs. a.) ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents in a timely manner for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #65, #84, #89) observed for incontinence care on 1 of 2 units ([NAME] Glen and Laurel Creek units). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the professional standards of practice related to pain management. Specifically not a.) obtaining a physician's order for severe pain and administering pain medication according to the appropriate pain level, b.) administering pain medications as ordered by a physician and c.) appropriately assessing, monitoring, and recognizing verbal and non-verbal signs and symptoms of pain during a wound care treatment. This deficient practice was identified for three (3) of 3 residents (Resident #52, #114 and #200) reviewed for pain management. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a.) On 01/10/24 at 11:07 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed watching the television. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner that is intended to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses and b.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 01/10/24 at 09:43 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD#1) for the Assisted Living unit and the Regional Director of Dining Services (RDDS). FSD#1 stated that the FSD#2 for the Long-Term Care unit would be on site shortly. The tour commenced and the following was observed: 1. At handwashing sink #1, there was a step-lid trashcan with no plastic trash bag, with trash and debris observed inside the can. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint NJ #: 168814 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards and procedures to address the risk of infection transmission by failing to: a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices during a wound treatment observation by One (1) of two (2) nursing staff observed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound treatments (Resident # 114); [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/16/24 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #103 ambulate into the day room and begin conversing with the other residents. At that time, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) entered the day room and redirected the resident. According to the admission Record, Resident #103 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy (condition that causes brain dysfunction), unspecified dementia with agitation, depression, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety, and insomnia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/16/24 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #103 ambulate into the day room and begin conversing with the other residents. At that time, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) entered the day room and redirected the resident. According to the admission Record, Resident #103 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy (condition that causes brain dysfunction), unspecified dementia with agitation, depression, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety, and insomnia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that identified resident behavior and preferences. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 36 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for care plans and evidenced by the following: On 1/10/24 at 10:44 AM, the surveyor observed the resident lying in bed, but permitted the surveyor to enter. The surveyor observed the bottom of the room's radiator unit broken, open and exposed. The surveyor located the resident's call bell in the bottom, closed nightstand drawer. The surveyor also observed a sign that depicted a call bell on Resident #45's closet door that stated, press the red button for help from nurse. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint NJ #: 168814 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to address recommendations from the Wound Care Consultant (WCC) in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #502) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #502 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, COVID-19, diabetes mellitus, and dementia with anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 10/12/23, included the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 14, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #160989 Based on observation, interview and review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records accurately and completely in accordance with acceptable standards and practices for one (1) of 36 residents reviewed (Residents #505). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/10/24, the surveyor team entered the facility for the annual recertification survey. Resident #505 was not a resident in the facility and was discharged on 01/20/23. The admission Record (AR) indicated that Resident #505 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to retention of urine, altered mental status and seizure disorder. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ165363, NJ165497, NJ168316 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/17/2023 and 10/19/2023, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment and supervision of a ambulatory cognitively impaired resident on a secured unit. The facility failed to identify that a staff member didn't follow the policy for storage of personal items. It was determined on 9/7/2023 that an Activity Assistant (AA) left her Cambridge fanny pack (a facility issued fanny pack with zipper provided to staff during orientation to carry around items securely.) unsupervised on the second shelve of a three-tier activity cart and the resident ( Resident #2) took it. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ00159128 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation on 09/06/23 and 09/07/23 it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a timely reweigh for a resident with an identified significant weight loss. and contact the Registered Dietitian in writing regarding a resident with an identified significant weight loss. The facility also failed to follow their policy for, Weight Assessment and Intervention for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for weight loss. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ00159128 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 09/06/23 and 09/07/23, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently document on the Documentation Survey Report (DSR) the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to the residents according to the facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #2: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/8/2021 from 9:14 AM to 10:12 AM the surveyors, accompanied by the Director of Dining Services (DODS) observed the following in the kitchen: 1. During observation of the high temperature dish machine the surveyor observed unidentified debris on the top of the dish machine, on the temperature gauge panel and below the power and motor switches. Unidentified white, dried, splash type stains were observed on the door of the machine. When interviewed the DODS stated, It gets cleaned weekly but should be wiped down daily. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, was completed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 23 sampled residents, (Resident #103). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the Hartford Unit on 9/08/21 at 11:03 AM, Resident #103 was observed lying in bed on an air mattress. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed Resident #103 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including but not limited to Fractured Hip. [...]
13 fire safety citations on file: 8 on August 5, 2025, 5 on September 15, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.30 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.07 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.80 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.9% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.40 on weekdays and 3.07 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.51 in April to June 2025 to 3.30 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.30 | 0.51 | 3.40 | 3.07 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 157 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.57 | 0.53 | 3.69 | 3.26 | 0.7% | 0 of 92 | 155 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.78 | 0.56 | 3.93 | 3.40 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 149 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.51 | 0.54 | 3.73 | 2.95 | 0.3% | 0 of 91 | 148 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.8 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.0 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 314 eligible stays.
11.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 359 eligible stays.
6.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 218 eligible stays.
75.3% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 142 residents counted.
0.3% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 329 residents counted.
3.8% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 327 residents counted.
99.3% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CAMBRIDGE OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinto Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 89% | 01/01/2022 |
| Bokf,na | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/31/2020 | |
| Bauer, Gary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/31/2022 | |
| Johnson, Celeste | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/18/2024 | |
| Johnson, Celeste | Corporate director | Individual | 03/18/2024 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/10/2021 | |
| Blank, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/31/2020 | |
| Johnson, Celeste | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/18/2024 | |
| Cambridge Property 1 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/31/2020 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/10/2025 | |
| Nfr 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/10/2025 | |
| Quinto Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/10/2025 | |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Sk 2013 Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Sora Kohn Fam Tr Uad 120120 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Tryko Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Ukr Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2020 | |
| Yr 2013 Delta Tr Ua 03252013 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Bauer, Gary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/31/2022 | |
| Blank, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/31/2020 | |
| Johnson, Celeste | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2024 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.