Discovery Village at Southlake
201 Watermere Drive, Southlake, TX 76092 · Tarrant County · (817) 482-1340
41 certified beds, about 40 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2014
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676351 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 4, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 15 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,649 in the last three years; the largest was $12,649, and the latest is dated September 29, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.63 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.85 of those hours.
43.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
June 4, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for infection control.1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene in between glove changes while providing toileting care for Resident #40.2. The facility failed to ensure CNA A disinfected surfaces with acceptable disinfecting wipe. These failures could result in infection.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 (Resident #32) of 10 resident rooms reviewed for smoke detectors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had a functional smoke detector installed in his room. This failure could result in an unsafe environment.
November 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #1's needs as follows:1. Stage 2 wound on his bottom (pressure ulcer)2. Right heel edema (leg swelling)3. Bowl movement changes due to ileus (this is temporary slowing or cessation of intestinal movement)4. Disease process Colitis (this is inflammation of the colon which may cause abdominal pain, diarrhea and sometimes blood in stool)5. Use of high blood pressure medication Lisinopril6. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure accurately documented skilled nurse notes for Resident #1 on 10/16/25 when RN A documented Resident #1 was a female, he had a left hip fracture, was forgetful, had poor motor coordination, and had balance problems when standing. This failure could place residents at risk for incorrect treatment decisions, evaluation, and treatment plans compromising patient safety due to insufficient information and could cause confusion about the residents' care and place residents at risk for harm due to inaccurate records.
April 11, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #3, #5, #30, and Resident #34) reviewed for care plans in that: Residents #3, #5, #30, and Resident #34 use of bed rails/grab/transfer bars were not documented in their care plans. The facility's failure placed residents requiring care at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary care and services, and a failure to ensure continuity of care.
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to assess the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #3, #5, #30, and Resident #34) rooms observed for bed rails/grab/transfer bars. The facility did not have informed consent and assessment of the residents for appropriateness or risk of entrapment for bed rails or grab/transfer bars for Residents #3, #5, #30, and Resident #34. [...]
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen observed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to remove five dented cans from the dry food storage area. 2. The facility failed to label a plastic container in the dry food storage area. The failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness.
March 14, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and storage. The facility failed to ensure the thermometer used in the refrigerator read the accurate temperature. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness.
- F Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 out of 1 kitchen observed. The facility failed to have a garbage can near the handwashing sink. The facility failed to ensure garbage cans with lids were used in the kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk for foodborne illness.
- F Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information for quarter review for Fiscal year Quarter 1 of 2024 (October 1- December 31, 2023). The facility failed to submit RN staff hours for 11/12/23, 12/02/23, 12/03/23, 12/17/23, 12/24/23, and 12/30/23.
- E Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for 1 (back hallway) of 2 hallways reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure private and confidential clinical records were not left in the back hallway unattended. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for lack of privacy and confidentiality.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bowel and bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore as much bowel functions as possible for 1 of 1 (Resident #127) residents reviewed for bowel and blader incontinence. Facility failed to obtain physician orders for Resident #130's suprapubic indwelling catheter, catheter care, and maintenance (A suprapubic catheter is surgically implanted between the urinary bladder and the skin used to drain urine from the bladder). This failure could place residents at risk of infection.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care are provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #127) reviewed for respiratory care. Facility failed to obtain physician orders for Resident #127 to use, care, and maintain a CPAP machine. A CPAP machine is Continuous Positive Airways Pressure machine to keep breathing airways open while sleeping. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing infections and a decreased quality of care. Findings Included: [...]
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bed rails for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 11) reviewed for bed rails. The facility failed to ensure physician orders were written for bed rail use for Resident #11. This failure could place residents at risk of injury. Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #11's admission Records dated 03/13/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to facility on 03/15/23. [...]
September 29, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. LVN A failed to transcribe the correction medication list when Resident #1 was discharged from the hospital back to the facility, which led to Resident #1 being administered incorrect medications from 09/14/23 to 09/16/23 which were originally for Resident #2. The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) was identified as past noncompliance (PNC) on 09/14/23 and ended on 09/16/23. [...]
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 4, 2026, 9 on April 11, 2025, 3 on March 14, 2024.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Establish policies and procedures for volunteers.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- F Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- F Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 29, 2023 | Fine | $12,649 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.63 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.85 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.31 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.86 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.76 on weekdays and 3.31 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.50 in April to June 2025 to 3.63 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.85 | 3.76 | 3.31 | 0.6% | 0 of 90 | 40 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.61 | 0.78 | 3.68 | 3.41 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.61 | 0.69 | 3.66 | 3.47 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 39 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.50 | 0.57 | 3.54 | 3.40 | 0.9% | 0 of 91 | 37 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 38.8 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DSL TENANT II, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hcri Tucson Properties Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 98% | 04/01/2019 |
| Denovellis, Aaron | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Duncan, Lawrence | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Hutchinson, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Wierzbicki, Steve | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| American Trust Senior Care LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2019 | |
| Smith, Randy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Wierzbicki, Steve | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 11, 2025: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 12, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 11, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park Southlake, 0.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Keller Oaks Healthcare Center Keller, 1.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Avir at Keller Keller, 3.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Bear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Grapevine, 4.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Oakmont Guest Care Center Hurst, 4.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Fort Worth, 4.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- The Harrison at Heritage Fort Worth, 5.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort W Keller, 5.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 26 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Discovery Village at Southlake's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Discovery Village at Southlake 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Discovery Village at Southlake get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 4, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Discovery Village at Southlake been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,649 in the last three years.
- Does Discovery Village at Southlake accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns Discovery Village at Southlake?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers. Legal business name: DSL TENANT II, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.