170 Stonebridge Lane, Southlake, TX 76092 · Tarrant County · (817) 431-5778
112 certified beds, about 95 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676249 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 36 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $125,895 in the last three years; the largest was $113,246, and the latest is dated August 22, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.30 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
60.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Cantex Continuing Care, an affiliated group of 37 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to administer Resident #1's oxycodone 10mg at 9:00 PM on 07/13/26 according to physician's orders. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. LVN C failed to document on the EMAR when she administered hydrocodone (pain medication) to Resident #1 on 05/11/26 at 4:00 AM. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, potential for not receiving their prescribed medications, and risk of drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined if a resident was able to self-administer medications for 3 of 33 residents (Resident #41, Resident #115 and Resident #118) reviewed for resident rights.1. The facility's interdisciplinary team failed to ensure Resident #41 was clinically appropriate to self-administer Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, Azelastine HCL and Major Deep Sea Premium Saline Nasal Spray that were at the resident's bedside.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #115, with nasal spray at her bedside, was clinically appropriate to self-administer medications that were at the resident's bedside.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #118 was clinically appropriate to self-administer cough syrup that were at the resident's bedside. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 44 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for the use of an arm sling and leg brace for Resident #45. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and worsening of their conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health by providing foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition 2 of 5 residents (Resident #42 and Resident #75) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to provide Resident #42 and Resident #75 assistance with toenail care. Resident #42 and Resident #75 toenails were observed to be about half inch long on each foot. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for 2 of 33 residents (Resident #39 and Resident #118) on one hall reviewed for storage of medications.1. The facility failed to ensure two pills (Zoloft and Memantine) were not left on the floor in Resident #39's room on 01/06/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #118 cough syrup was not left unattended at his bedside on 01/06/26. This failure could place residents at risk of consuming unsafe medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate the assessment with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR ) program for one (Resident #49) of five resident assessments reviewed for PASARR evaluations. The facility did not refer Resident #49 to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when she received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. This failure could affect residents with psychiatric diagnoses who may not be evaluated and receive needed PASARR services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's Stage 3 pressure ulcer was covered with a dressing. This failure could place residents at risk of severe pain, and lead to systemic infections causing harm for residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #104) records reviewed for treatment documentation. The facility failed to document wound care treatments on the Treatment Administration Record for Resident #10 and Resident #104 indicated by blanks on residents January 2026 TAR.These failures could affect the residents medical record not being an accurate representation of the resident's medical condition or medical needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for infection control. LNV C failed to put on appropriate PPE, a gown, before administering daily water flush via gastronomy tube to Resident #8, who was on enhanced barrier precautions. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to acquire and administer Resident #1's physician ordered medications timely when she admitted to the facility on [DATE], which resulted in the resident missing one dose of the antibiotic, Daptomycin-Sodium Chloride Intravenous Solution 700-0.9 mg/100 ml, six doses of the central nervous system stimulant, Adderall 20 mg, and seven doses of Juven, a physician-ordered therapeutic nutrition powder for wound healing, after she admitted to the facility on [DATE] following knee revision surgery. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive assessment of a resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's catheter/catheter balloon remained in place in the bladder. On 08/04/25, the resident had a change in condition, and the NP ordered bloodwork, a UA, and a catheter change. During the catheter change, Resident #1 began to bleed from the catheter site and a few hours later, labs from the bloodwork came back critical and was sent to the hospital. Resident #1 was diagnosed with acute kidney failure and trauma to the urethra due to the catheter balloon not being in the right location. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/21/25 at 4:55 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 ad Resident #2) records reviewed for treatment documentation. 1. LVN A documented Resident #1 had received his g-tube feeding on 05/24/25 morning and evening, but the resident did not receive his feeding for approximately 11 hours. 2. The facility failed to document wound care treatments on the Treatment Administration Record for Resident #2 indicated by blanks on Resident #2's June 2025 TAR. These failures could affect the residents medical record not being an accurate representation of the resident's medical condition or medical needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who received nutrition by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility failed to follow physician's orders of providing Resident #1 with his 22 hours of feeding intake on 05/24/25. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 05/24/25 and ended on 05/25/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in health or adverse effects due to inappropriate management of G-tube care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices for activities of daily living including toileting for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for ADL assistance. CNA A failed to provide Resident #1 with a bedpan for toileting and instead told the resident to use her brief on 12/04/24. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable, disrespected, have a decreased self-esteem and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's care plan addressed pain management and behaviors. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary care and services, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure various foods stored in the pantry were sealed, dated, and labeled. This failure could place all residents at risk for food contamination and food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident, resident representative and send a copy to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood for 1 (Resident #) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to notify Resident #74, the resident representative, and the Ombudsman in writing of the transfer/discharge of the resident to the hospital, the reason for the transfer/discharge, and the right to appeal. This failure could put residents at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and appeal processes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's room was free of ants, and the resident sustained ant bites on his arms, legs, and stomach on 08/06/24, which were treated with hydrocortisone cream. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 08/06/24 and ended on 08/08/24. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of one resident observed during a transfer. CNA A failed to transfer Resident #1 safely when he failed to use a gait belt and independently lifted Resident #1 under her armpits when transferring Resident #1 from her bed to her shower chair on 09/04/24. This failure could affect the residents by placing the residents at risk for discomfort, pain, and/or injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure LVN A gave Resident #1 the correct IV antibiotic; she was given Resident #2's antibiotic. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 03/26/24 and ended on 03/27/24. The facility has corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving medications as prescribed, decreased therapeutic effects of the medications, risk for drug diversion, delay in medication administration and worsening of their medical conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN A gave Resident #1 the correct IV antibiotic; she was given Resident #2's antibiotic. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 03/26/24 and ended on 03/27/24. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk for harm and/or serious injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure at the time residents were admitted they had physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for admission orders in that RN A failed to enter physician orders for Resident #1's wound vacuum and wound care. This failure could cause the residents to have a worsening of the condition of their wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care in that: RN-A failed to provide wound care for Resident's left lower leg wound from 1/10/24-1/12/24. This failure could lead to the resident's wound worsening.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's MDS assessment identified her accurately for the ability to make herself understood and the ability to understand others. This failure could place residents at risk of not having accurate assessments, which could compromise their plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for parenteral fluids. The facility failed to obtain physician orders to manage, provide care, and change Resident #1's CVC dressing at least every 7 days and as needed if the dressing or site appeared compromised (damp, loosened or visibly soiled). The facility failed to change Resident #1's CVC dressing at least every 7 days and ensure Resident #1's central line was maintained per professional standards and facility policy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform and consult with the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes. LVN A failed to notify the physician when Resident #1 had a change of condition in clinical status (vital signs). On 10/04/23 at 4:51 PM, LVN A notified NP K that Resident #1 had an elevated temperature [greater than 100.0 F]. On 10/04/23 at 5:00 PM, DNP L assessed and discovered (Resident #1) had a significant change in health status (a rapid heart rate and low blood pressure) during an unrelated visit. DNP L called and informed NP K of her findings and suggested Resident #1 be transferred to hospital. LVN A text NP K of DNP L findings on 10/04/23 at 5:34 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for five (11/19/22, 11/20/22, 11/27/22, 12/4/22, and 12/11/22) of 60 days reviewed. The facility failed to have RN coverage in the facility for eight consecutive hours on 11/19/22, 11/20/22, 11/27/22, 12/4/22, and 12/11/22. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were kept away from contaminants and an unsanitary environment. 2. The facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and sealed. 3. The facility failed to ensure that food items were discarded before expiration date. These failures could place all residents, who receive food from the kitchen, at an increased risk for food contamination and food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 staff (LVN A and MA D) of 3 staff observed during medication pass and 6 (803, 809, 808, 114, 116, and 303) of 6 Isolation rooms observed for infection control in that: 1. LVN A failed to sanitize the medication cart top after placing a contaminated blood pressure cuff on the cart top, sanitizing the cuff and then placing the cuff back on the cart top without disinfecting cart top. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies that prevent abuse for one (Resident #99) of five residents reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility failed to suspend LVN X after Resident #99's RP #2 made an allegation of verbal abuse. These failures could place residents at risk by leaving suspected abusers in contact with facility residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and secured in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for medication administration, in that: The faciility failed to ensure that medications (Timolol maleate, Azopt eye drops and Fluticasone & Salmeterol Inhaler), were not stored at Resident #30's bedside. This deficient practice could place residents who received medication at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication and accidentally or intentionally self-administering the medication and place all residents/others at risk of taking medication not intended for their use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1(Resident #52) of 6 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets received the diet ordered per physician order. The facility failed to provide Resident #52 with snacks between each meal as ordered by a physician. This failure could affect all residents who have physician orders for a specialized or therapeutic diet and could place the residents at risk for weight loss and a decline in health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted as required each day for two (09/18/23 and 09/19/23) of three days reviewed for nursing services and postings. The facility failed to update the daily staffing information posting on 09/18/23 and 09/19/23. This failure could affect residents, their families, and facility visitors by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format and submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS for submitting accurate staffing information for four (FY Quarter 4 2023, FY Quarter 3, FY Quarter 2 2023, and FY Quarter 1 2023) of four quarters reviewed for accurate staffing information and submitting accurate RN hours for two (FY Quarter 4 2022 and FY Quarter 1 2023) of two quarters reviewed for accurate RN hours. [...]
12 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 8, 2026, 7 on October 3, 2024, 2 on September 20, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 22, 2025 | Fine | $113,246 |
| September 20, 2023 | Fine | $12,649 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.30 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.89 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 72.7% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.86 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.46 on weekdays and 2.89 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.34 in April to June 2025 to 3.30 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.30 | 0.37 | 3.46 | 2.89 | 0.9% | 0 of 90 | 95 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.14 | 0.35 | 3.29 | 2.75 | 1.2% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.31 | 0.48 | 3.50 | 2.84 | 1.8% | 0 of 92 | 82 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.34 | 0.56 | 3.59 | 2.73 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 77 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 120 eligible stays.
13.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 138 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
60.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 85 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 85 residents counted.
94.7% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Cantex Continuing Care, a group of 37 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas County Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2019 |
| Castaneda, Edmundo | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/2022 | |
| Cerise, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/24/2014 | |
| Carlyle Health Care Center Ltd Co | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Washington, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/06/2024 | |
| Carlyle Health Care Center Ltd Co | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Megwa, Bernadine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Washington, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/06/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.