Find a nursing home

Home / Kansas / Atwood

Good Samaritan - Atwood

650 Lake Road #216, Atwood, KS 67730 · Rawlins County · (785) 626-9015

35 certified beds, about 26 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
1 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175366 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 18, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 26 health citations since June 2022, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 3 fines totaling $68,956 in the last three years; the largest was $51,146, and the latest is dated July 31, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.06 of those hours.

22.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
1K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
9E
5F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
June 18, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    F576 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to deliver mail to the facility residents on Saturdays. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for not having reasonable access to send or receive written communications.
  2. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents and one kitchen. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for 25 residents who reside in the facility and receive their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk of not receiving adequate nutrition.
  3. E
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    F802 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve the midday meal within 45 minutes of the designated time of 11:30 AM. This deficiency placed the residents at risk of an impaired dining experience.
  4. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner for the residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility's kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness.
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wrotehe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove used during high contact resident care activities) for Resident (R) 23 gastrostomy tube (G-tube: tube surgically placed through an artificial opening into the stomach). This placed the resident at risk for possible exposure to infection.
  6. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 18 or their representative the completed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) form 10055, and failed to provide R27 or their representative the completed CMS Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMOC) form 10123. This placed the resident at risk of uninformed decisions about their skilled services.
July 31, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. K
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 24 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse and initiate protective measures until an investigation was completed. On 07/24/24 at 09:37 PM Resident (R)1 told her daughter that a dirty old man came into her room and tried to get into her pants. At 10:00 PM R1's representative called the facility and reported the allegation to Licensed Nurse (LN). LN G told R1's representative there were no male staff working that night and said she had been down R1's hallway passing medications and had not seen anyone walking in the hall. LN G told R1's representative she would go down and talk to R1 and report the incident to Administrative Nurse D. At 11:00 PM, R1 asked LN G if she had told the nurse that she was molested. [...]
  2. J
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 24 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported Resident (R)1's allegation of sexual abuse to the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and further failed to report the sexual abuse allegation to the required state agencies including law enforcement. On 07/24/24 at 09:37 PM, R1 told her representative that a dirty old man came into her room and tried to get into her pants. At 10:00 PM R1's representative called the facility and reported the allegation to Licensed Nurse (LN). LN G told R1's representative there were no male staff working that night and said she had been down R1's hallway passing medications and had not seen anyone walking in the hall. [...]
May 9, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27. The sample included three residents reviewed for pressure injuries/ulcers. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate treatment to prevent the worsening of a facility acquired pressure ulcer and failed to promote healing. On 12/15/23, Resident (R) 1, who required assistance from two staff for bed mobility, developed a facility acquired unstageable (depth of the wound is unknown due to the wound bed is covered by a thick layer of other tissue and pus) pressure ulcer to her left heel. The facility applied heel protectors but did not involve the provider until seven days later. The provider ordered a dressing to the wound, changed every seven days. The wound became stagnant and lacked any signs of healing from 12/22/23 through 03/23/24 when a new treatment was started. [...]
January 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a fall with major injury to Resident (R) 1. On 12/11/23 at approximately 07:45 AM, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) M failed to apply the safety belt in the bath chair. As a result of this failure, R1 sustained a displaced intertrochanteric (area between the greater and lesser hip bone) fracture (broken bone) of the right femur (the bone of the thigh). This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain, decreased mobility, and impaired quality of life.
September 28, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    F730 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all nurse aides received the required number of in-service training hours per year. This placed the residents at risk for impaired quality of care.
  2. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a full time Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) to supervise the preparation of meals and sanitation in the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice placed the 33 residents of the facility at risk for inadequate nutrition or food borne illness.
  3. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate sanitation of dishware used for preparing and serving residents' meals, and failed to monitor cold temperature storage of resident foods. This deficient practice placed the 33 residents of the facility at risk for food borne illness.
  4. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards related to unlocked chemicals and unsecured hydocollator for five cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. This placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide personal grooming assistance and cares for Resident (R) 28. This placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene and impaired dignity
  6. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to involve the physician and Registered Dietician (RD) in an adequate timeframe after Resident (R) 26 experienced a large weight loss in 11 days in April 2023. This deficient practice placed R26 at risk for further weight loss or health issues.
  7. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident(R)1's insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) flex pen, stored in the medication room, with the date openedand discard date. This deficient practice placed the affected resident at risk for ineffective medications.
  8. C
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent survey (the last standard survey, extended surveys, or subsequent complaint suveys with citations) results were available for public review. - On 09/26/23 at 08:30 AM, surveyors reviewed the Survey Result Binder in the plastic storage container on the East wall close to the Administrator's office. The facility failed to ensure the Statement of Deficiencies (SOD) from the 10/12/23 complaint survey which resulted in a citation was available for review. On 09/26/23 at 08:32 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the 10/12/22 complaint survey SOD was not in the survey binder. Administrative Staff A then retrieved the results and added them to the binder. [...]
June 16, 2022Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to treat the resident's with dignity promoting quality of life when the facility failed to serve meals at the same time to all residents seated at the same table. This placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial wellbeing.
  2. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance at mealtime for seven residents who required staff assistance with eating. This placed the residents at risk for poor nutrition and weight loss.
  3. E
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide weekend activities. This deficient practice placed the residents in the facility at risk for boredom and decreased socialization.
  4. E
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    F802 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview dietary staff failed to effectively carry out the meal preparation and food service in a manner which allowed for prompt meal delivery and facilitated social dining for the 34 residents residing in the facility, placing them at risk for impaired nutrition and decreased quality of life.
  5. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare pureed foods (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for four residents who received pureed diets placing the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. The facility further failed to ensure appropriate temperatures for food items served in the dining room. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illness.
  6. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for discharge. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State office of Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of a facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R) 8. This placed the resident at risk for impaired coordination of care, and loss of rights related to facility-initiated discharge and/or transfer. Findings Included: - R8's Electronic Medical Record included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behaviors, insomnia (inability to sleep) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). R8's Annual Minimum Data Set dated 03/09/22 recorded R8 had a brief interview for mental Status score of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment. [...]
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 14 residents with six reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision for one of the six sampled residents, Resident (R) 6, who had an unsupervised fall and sustained a minor injury. This placed the resident at risk for further accidents and injuries.
  8. D
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    F849 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure coordination between the hospice provider and the facility for Resident (R) 34, who was admitted to hospice on 02/12/22, which included a plan of care from the hospice and a description of the services provided including visit frequency, medications and medical equipment. This placed the resident at risk of delayed or inadequate care.

Fire safety inspections

17 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 18, 2025, 8 on September 28, 2023, 4 on June 16, 2022.

Every fire safety citation17 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · June 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · June 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · June 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · September 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. L
    Satisfy building requirements after a repair, renovation, modification, or change of user/occupancy.
    K 111 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. L
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. L
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. L
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
July 31, 2024Fine $51,146
May 9, 2024Fine $8,499
January 3, 2024Fine $9,311

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeKansasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.584.073.86
Registered nurses1.060.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.173.603.42
Nurse aides1.86
Licensed practical nurses0.66
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)22.2%48.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%42.0%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.74 on weekdays and 3.17 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.88 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.581.063.743.17 0.3%0 of 9026
Oct to Dec 20253.541.083.713.12 0.1%0 of 9226
Jul to Sep 20254.011.214.243.42 0.3%0 of 9224
Apr to Jun 20253.881.304.103.34 0.0%0 of 9126
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Kansas, Jan to Mar 20264.010.674.193.564.8%0.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Kansas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Kansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.27$17.41 to $21.2424,610
LPNs and LVNs$29.69$27.05 to $33.407,530
Registered nurses$38.14$35.24 to $45.5333,800
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Good Samaritan - Atwood. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeKansasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.617.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.12.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.34.33.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.216.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.54.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.918.115.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.71.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.12.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Good Samaritan - Atwood's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Schieffer, KevinCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Kuhlman, DanielOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/25/2018
Morrison, TonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Portschy, JacquelineOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/22/2022
Kuhlman, DanielAdp of the SNFIndividual09/25/2018
Morrison, TonyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
Portschy, JacquelineAdp of the SNFIndividual05/22/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on May 9, 2024: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2025: "Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2025: "Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2024: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.17 hours per resident per day, below the Kansas average of 3.60.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan - Atwood's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan - Atwood 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan - Atwood get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 18, 2025. The Kansas average is 9.5.
Has Good Samaritan - Atwood been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 3 fines totaling $68,956 in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan - Atwood accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan - Atwood?
CMS lists 28 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection