Find a nursing home

Home / North Dakota / Bismarck

Good Samaritan Society Augusta Place a Prospera Co

301 Lorrain Drive, Bismarck, ND 58503 · Burleigh County · (701) 255-1084

48 certified beds, about 47 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355125 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 11, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since January 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $16,036 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated August 1, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.43 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.06 of those hours.

22.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 11, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
January 30, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of manufacturer's instructions and staff interview, the facility failed to sanitize surfaces in 1 of 1 facility kitchen. Failure to ensure the concentration of quaternary (quat) sanitizing solution is within manufacturer's guidelines may result in an incorrect solution concentration. Inadequate sanitization of the kitchen surfaces places residents at risk for foodborne illness.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 5 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #20, #30, #36, #38 and #200) and one supplemental resident (Resident #2) observed during cares and medication pass. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), droplet precautions, and hand hygiene, has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 2 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #33 and #39). Failure to update care plans limited the staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
  4. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of manufacturer's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #33) observed for insulin preparation and administration. Failure to properly prime an insulin pen and administer insulin correctly may result in residents receiving an inaccurate dose of insulin.
August 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident investigation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from significant medication errors for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1) receiving insulin. Failure to administer insulin according to a physician's order may have contributed to Resident #1's hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar level) and hospitalization. This citation is considered past noncompliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
May 9, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of the facility reported incident investigation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of hazards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) injured while consuming a hot beverage. Failure to place the hot beverage lid securely to the cup resulted in an injury to Resident #1. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
January 18, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of food temperature logs, review of resident council meeting minutes, and resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve hot foods at palatable temperatures on 3 of 3 units (Pine Ride, [NAME] Hills, and Eagle Bend). Failure to serve foods at a temperature acceptable to residents may result in decreased intake, weight loss, and inadequate nutrition.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteTHIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE SURVEY COMPLETED ON 01/19/23 Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #29 and #44) and one supplemental resident (Resident #12). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
  3. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the North Dakota Provider Manual Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) and Level of Care Screening Procedures for Long Term Care Services, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a status change assessment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #29) reviewed for PASARR. Failure to complete a change in status assessment with a newly diagnosed mental illness may result in the delivery of care and services inconsistent with the resident's needs.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of manufacturer's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #9) observed during a transfer utilizing a sit-to-stand mechanical lift transfer. Failure to ensure proper use of a stand lift during transfers placed the resident at risk for accidents and injury.
  5. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medication regimen remained free of unnecessary medications for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #44) reviewed for antipsychotic medications. Failure to consistently monitor residents while on the medication may result in the residents experiencing adverse consequences related to the antipsychotic medication.
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate labeling of medications for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #45) observed during medication administration. Failure to ensure medication cards contain the correct administration information may result in medication errors and adverse drug effects.
  7. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary food service in 1 of 3 kitchenettes (Eagle Bend). Failure to ensure safe transportation of foods to resident rooms and ensure utilization of sanitary food service equipment has the potential to result in contamination of food and spread illness to resident, staff, and visitors. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Safe Meal Service occurred on 01/18/24. This policy, reviewed 01/11/23, stated, . Meals served in resident's rooms . need to be covered during transportation. Upon completion of the meal by the resident in their room, nursing will document the necessary detail of food consumption before placing the used tray into the enclosed 'dirty' cart in the kitchenette. [...]

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 11, 2026.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · February 11, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · February 11, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
August 1, 2024Fine $8,018
May 9, 2024Fine $8,018

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.434.423.86
Registered nurses1.060.930.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.923.803.42
Nurse aides2.75
Licensed practical nurses0.62
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)22.4%48.8%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%40.3%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.64 on weekdays and 3.92 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.41 in April to June 2025 to 4.43 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.431.064.643.92 0.0%0 of 9047
Oct to Dec 20254.321.034.513.84 0.0%0 of 9247
Jul to Sep 20254.331.034.533.83 0.0%0 of 9248
Apr to Jun 20254.411.024.633.85 0.0%0 of 9147
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Dakota, Jan to Mar 20264.570.924.813.9611.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
32.219.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.51.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.92.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.75.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.417.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.04.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.722.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.019.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.311.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.71.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.61.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Schieffer, KevinCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Al Rabadi, IssaOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2021
Morrison, TonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Sandgren, DeeandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/16/2023
Troy, PeterOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/08/2022
Fluit, JoelIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual11/25/2025
Dtn Staffing IncAdp of the SNFOrganization08/02/2024
Focusone SolutionsAdp of the SNFOrganization03/04/2024
Grape Tree Medical Staffing LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/13/2018
SanfordAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
Al Rabadi, IssaAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2021
Brown, GeorgeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Fluit, JoelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Middleton, AimeeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/27/2022
Molbert, LaurisAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Morrison, TonyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
North, AndrewAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Olson, NicholasAdp of the SNFIndividual04/08/2024
Sandgren, DeeandraAdp of the SNFIndividual07/16/2023
Schema, NathanAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Schieffer, KevinAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Troy, PeterAdp of the SNFIndividual08/08/2022
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2024: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 9, 2024: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

Other nursing homes nearby

North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan Society Augusta Place a Prospera Co's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society Augusta Place a Prospera Co 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society Augusta Place a Prospera Co get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 11, 2026. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
Has Good Samaritan Society Augusta Place a Prospera Co been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $16,036 in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan Society Augusta Place a Prospera Co accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan Society Augusta Place a Prospera Co?
CMS lists 56 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection