Find a nursing home

Home / North Dakota / Mandan

Good Samaritan Society Miller Pointe a Prospera Co

3500 21st St. Se, Mandan, ND 58554 · Morton County · (701) 323-1300

120 certified beds, about 116 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355106 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 31, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $35,535 in the last three years; the largest was $35,535, and the latest is dated March 6, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.34 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.90 of those hours.

21.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
December 31, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 5 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #3, #37, #65, #73, and #121) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), personal protective equipment (PPE), dressing changes, glove changes, and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #100) observed with medications at bedside. Failure to ensure residents take all prescribed medications and document medication administration may result in errors and/or adverse effects for the resident.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure medication storage for 1 of 6 unlocked and unattended medications cars (Driftwood Lane). Failure to securely store medications may result in unauthorized access to medications by residents, visitors, and staff.
  4. D
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of menus, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food according to prepared menus for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #10, #11, and #74) observed during tray line. Failure to serve food according to the portion sizes listed on the resident's menu/tray card may result in inadequate nutrition and weight loss or weight gain.
March 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI), review of facility training records, review of facility policy, review of manufacturer's guide, and staff interview, the facility failed to utilize devices necessary to prevent accidents and/or injury for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) observed while in a spa chair. Failure to utilize the spa chair safety belt resulted in Resident #1 experiencing a fall and fracture and placed all residents at risk for falls and/or injury. During the on-site FRI investigation, the surveyor consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 02/23/25. The IJ resulted from the facility's failure to utilize the spa safety belt and the resident sustained a fracture. * 02/27/25 at 9:47 a.m. [...]
November 7, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2024
    Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 1 of 3 sampled residents with an indwelling catheter (Resident #163) and 2 of 3 residents (Residents #34 and #89) on transmission-based precautions (TBP). Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and TBP has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
September 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, review of staff education, review of facility reported incident, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who fell out of a mechanical lift. Failure to safely use the mechanical lift resulted in a fall with injury for Resident #1. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 24, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility reported incident, review of facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of potential neglect to the State Survey Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who fell out of a mechanical lift. Failure to report an event of potential neglect in the required time frame does not comply with regulations established to protect residents.
October 19, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice regarding medication administration for 19 of 20 unidentified residents on the 100 unit. Failure to follow professional standards for safe medication preparation and administration placed the residents at risk of receiving the wrong medication.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices on 2 of 2 units with Covid positive residents (Unit 500 and 600). Failure to follow infection control practices related to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) has the potential to transmit infections to other residents, staff, and visitors.
  3. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to promote privacy and confidentiality of the medication administration records (MAR) on 2 of 6 units (300 and 400 unit) observed. Failure to promote resident privacy and lock computer screens may result in unauthorized viewing of resident records by other residents, visitors, or unlicensed staff.
  4. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or their representative and/or the State Long Term Care Ombudsman written notice of transfer for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #30, #47, and #68) with a hospital transfer. Failure to provide a written copy of the transfer notice does not allow the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding their rights or inform the Ombudsman of the transfer.
  5. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice to 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #30) with a transfer to the hospital. Failure to provide the facility's bed-hold notice does not allow residents or their legal representatives to make informed choices regarding their readmission rights.
  6. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current status for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #39 and #81). Failure to review and revise the care plan limited staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care and safety.
  7. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and family and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #81) requiring substantial assistance with dressing or transfers. Failure to dress and assist the resident out of bed may result in decreased self-esteem and quality of life.
September 14, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, manufacturer resources, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #3) who required a full body mechanical lift with sling for transfers. Failure to ensure staff utilize the proper size sling for each resident placed all residents who transfer with a mechanical lift at risk for accident and/or injury.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on December 31, 2025.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. F
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · December 31, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
March 6, 2025Fine $35,535

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.344.423.86
Registered nurses0.900.930.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.963.803.42
Nurse aides2.87
Licensed practical nurses0.57
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)21.9%48.8%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%40.3%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.50 on weekdays and 3.96 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.34 in April to June 2025 to 4.34 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.340.904.503.96 0.0%0 of 90116
Oct to Dec 20254.380.914.514.05 0.0%0 of 92114
Jul to Sep 20254.380.764.524.03 0.1%0 of 92116
Apr to Jun 20254.340.694.474.02 0.1%0 of 91115
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Dakota, Jan to Mar 20264.570.924.813.9611.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.819.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.42.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.05.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.41.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.017.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.44.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.422.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.619.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
14.511.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.01.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Schieffer, KevinCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Cartmill, KayleyOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/09/2012
Johnson, AnthonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2022
Morrison, TonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Sandgren, DeeandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/16/2023
Fluit, JoelIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual11/24/2025
Dtn Staffing IncAdp of the SNFOrganization08/02/2024
Focusone SolutionsAdp of the SNFOrganization03/04/2024
Grape Tree Medical Staffing LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/13/2018
SanfordAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Cartmill, KayleyAdp of the SNFIndividual12/09/2012
Dykhouse, DanaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Fluit, JoelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Johnson, AnthonyAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2022
Lundeen, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Middleton, AimeeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/27/2022
Molbert, LaurisAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Morrison, TonyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
North, AndrewAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Olson, NicholasAdp of the SNFIndividual04/08/2024
Sandgren, DeeandraAdp of the SNFIndividual07/16/2023
Schema, NathanAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Schieffer, KevinAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 31, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 31, 2025: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 19, 2023: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."

Other nursing homes nearby

North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan Society Miller Pointe a Prospera Co's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society Miller Pointe a Prospera Co 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society Miller Pointe a Prospera Co get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 31, 2025. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
Has Good Samaritan Society Miller Pointe a Prospera Co been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $35,535 in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan Society Miller Pointe a Prospera Co accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan Society Miller Pointe a Prospera Co?
CMS lists 55 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection