Find a nursing home

Home / North Dakota / Bismarck

Missouri Slope

4916 N Washington St., Bismarck, ND 58503 · Burleigh County · (701) 223-9407

192 certified beds, about 185 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2021

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355128 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 14, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since February 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $39,404 in the last three years; the largest was $30,580, and the latest is dated October 15, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.45 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.90 of those hours.

52.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 14, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 4 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #50, #61, #139, #154) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #30) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to glove use, hand hygiene, catheter care, equipment disinfection, and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #61) observed during a mechanical sit to stand lift transfer. Failure to secure the leg strap and the abdominal strap of the lift sling placed the resident at risk for falls.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored securely for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #24) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #109) with medications at the bedside. Failure to securely store medications may result in unauthorized use, adverse reactions, or ineffective treatment.
March 27, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that maintains or enhances residents' quality of life for 5 of 9 residents (Residents #3, #44, #45, #70, and #112) observed during medication administration and in 3 of 8 dining rooms (1st floor C/D wing, 2nd floor C/D wing, and 4th floor C/D wing). Failure to refer to residents by their preferred name and dispose of bags containing trash/dirty linens prior to entering dining rooms does not promote resident dignity or respect.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is stored in accordance with professional standards for food service sanitation in 6 of 8 nutrition stations (first floor A/B and C/D, second floor A/B and C/D, and third floor A/B and C/D). Failure to ensure food is safe from contamination by resident ice packs has the potential to result in a foodborne illness or adverse effects for residents, visitors, and staff.
  3. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed the appropriateness to self-administer medications (SAM) for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #70) observed during medication administration. Failure to determine whether SAM is a safe practice has the potential to result in a medication error and/or harm to a resident.
  4. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 1 of 9 resident's observed during medication administration. Failure to document medications after administration, does not reflect the actual time of administration or any refusals which may cause adverse effects for the resident.
  5. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of manufacturer's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #44 and #70) observed during medication administration. Four medication errors occurred during staff administration of 41 medications, resulting in a nine percent error rate. Failure to properly prepare and administer medications may inhibit the effectiveness of the medication and may have a negative impact on the resident's overall health.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #116 and #164) requiring enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Failure to practice infection control standards related to EBP and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
October 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility reported incident and investigation reports, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from mental and/or physical abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who was witnessed receiving physical and verbal abuse. Failure of facility staff to immediately report a witnessed incident of staff to resident abuse to the appropriate supervisor delayed the removal of the accused abuser, the start of the facility investigation, and assessment of the resident for injury. This delay placed Resident #1 at risk for further abuse, fear, anxiety, and/or psychosocial harm and placed other residents at risk for abuse.
June 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI), review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who sustained a fall with fracture. Failure to utilize the whirlpool seat belt resulted in an avoidable fall and fracture for Resident #1 and placed all residents at risk for falls and/or injuries. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
February 15, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
  1. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the current status for 2 of 36 sampled resident (Resident #69 and #138). Failure to review and revise the care plan limited staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #379) with orders for a knee immobilizer. Failure to follow physician's orders and the care plan for application, and report refusals of application, placed Resident #379 at risk for falls and discomfort/pain.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #138) reviewed for restorative therapy received the services developed by the therapy staff. Failure to follow up on a request to the provider for restorative nursing/therapy services may adversely affect the resident's ability to maintain range of motion (ROM), strength, and mobility.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient supervision for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #135 and #166) observed for safe transfers. Failure to provide appropriate and sufficient supervision during mechanical lift transfers (Resident t#166) and follow fall interventions (Resident #135) placed residents at risk for accidents, falls, and/or injuries.
  5. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care for 1 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #163) receiving oxygen by nasal cannula. Failure to administer oxygen according to the physician's order may result in complications and compromise the residents' respiratory status.
  6. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to control pain for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #17) investigated for pain management. Failure to administer pain medication as scheduled may have contributed to Resident #17 experiencing increased and/or unresolved pain.
  7. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #286) who received an as needed (PRN) psychotropic. Failure to limit PRN psychotropic use to 14 days unless reevaluated by a practitioner placed the resident as risk of receiving unnecessary medications and experiencing adverse drug effects.
  8. D
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    F825 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff and family interviews the facility failed to provide the required specialized rehabilitative services for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #156) with orders for physical therapy evaluation and treatment. Failure to provide physical therapy services as ordered for Resident #156 may result in impaired strength, impaired mobility, and increased pain.
  9. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #138) observed for medication administration via feeding tube and 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #91) on transmission-based precautions (TBP). Failure to follow infection control standards during medication administration and with TBP has the potential to transmit infections to residents, staff, and visitors.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 14, 2026, 1 on March 27, 2025, 1 on February 15, 2024.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · May 14, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  2. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · March 27, 2025 · Waiver
  3. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · February 15, 2024 · Waiver

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
October 15, 2024Fine $30,580
June 12, 2024Fine $8,824

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.454.423.86
Registered nurses0.900.930.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.603.803.42
Nurse aides3.94
Licensed practical nurses0.61
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)52.2%48.8%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover28.6%40.3%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.79 on weekdays and 4.60 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.41 in April to June 2025 to 5.45 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.450.905.794.60 6.6%0 of 90185
Oct to Dec 20255.480.845.754.79 13.3%0 of 92176
Jul to Sep 20255.400.815.734.57 9.2%0 of 92178
Apr to Jun 20255.410.715.724.64 12.8%0 of 91180
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Dakota, Jan to Mar 20264.570.924.813.9611.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for North Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
North Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.03$17.51 to $23.066,840
LPNs and LVNs$29.95$28.03 to $31.261,920
Registered nurses$38.81$33.47 to $44.7511,340
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Missouri Slope. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.819.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.41.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.62.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.65.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.71.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.017.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.54.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.122.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.419.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.111.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.01.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Missouri Slope's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

53.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · North Dakota: 0 better, 21 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 317 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · North Dakota: 2 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 343 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · North Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 212 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

61.1% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota50.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 193 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.7% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 230 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.4% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota2.9% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 230 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 117 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MISSOURI SLOPE LUTHERAN CARE CENTER, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Missouri Slope Lutheran Care Center, Inc.5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%11/06/2019
Andrist, SteveCorporate directorIndividual11/06/2019
Nitschke, DarrellCorporate directorIndividual09/26/2022
Saude, JerryCorporate directorIndividual11/06/2019
Thompson, ReierCorporate officerIndividual11/06/2019
Missouri Slope Lutheran Care Center, Inc.Operational/managerial controlOrganization11/06/2019
Hebert, BrianOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/23/2025
Thompson, ReierOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/06/2019
Missouri Slope Lutheran Care Center, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization02/13/2025
Hebert, BrianAdp of the SNFIndividual04/23/2025
Thompson, ReierAdp of the SNFIndividual11/06/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 27, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."

Other nursing homes nearby

North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Missouri Slope's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Missouri Slope 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Missouri Slope get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 14, 2026. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
Has Missouri Slope been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $39,404 in the last three years.
Does Missouri Slope accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Missouri Slope?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers. Legal business name: MISSOURI SLOPE LUTHERAN CARE CENTER, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection