Find a nursing home

Home / North Dakota / Bismarck

Baptist Health & Rehab

3400 Nebraska Drive, Bismarck, ND 58503 · Burleigh County · (701) 223-3040

140 certified beds, about 133 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355058 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 1, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 14 health citations since January 2024, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 3 fines totaling $35,323 in the last three years; the largest was $17,345, and the latest is dated July 22, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.09 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.

49.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).

CMS links it to Cassia, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
3G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
0E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 1, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
July 22, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of a facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for 1 of 1 closed resident record (Resident #1) who required respiratory support from a ventilator. Failure to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice and the physician's orders may have resulted in or contributed to Resident #1's death and placed all other ventilator-dependent residents at risk of injury or death. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following discovery of the incident. [...]
April 16, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment/services to prevent complications from a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) (a tube inserted through the abdomen that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #47) observed with a G-tube. Failure to flush the tube with water before and after medications may lead to dehydration and G-tube occlusion.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents #49, #73 and #436) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and observed during cares. Failure to follow EBP during tracheostomy (an opening through the neck into the windpipe) and percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) tube (feeding device inserted into the stomach through the abdomen) care for Resident #49, tracheostomy care (cleaning the airway tube and surrounding skin) for Resident #436, and wound care for Resident #73 has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
January 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of the facility reported incident, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) investigated for a fall. Failure to ensure staff used a mechanical lift properly and verified proper installation of attachments to the Broda chair (specialized wheelchair) resulted in a fall from the mechanical lift.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report an incident of abuse within 24 hours to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) who experienced an injury. Failure to report an event of potential abuse in the required time frame does not comply with regulations established to protect residents. This citation is considered past noncompliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented.
January 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident, investigation documents, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) investigated for falls. Failure to ensure staff use a gait belt during transfers resulted in a fracture and hospitalization. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
March 7, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess the use of a wheelchair seatbelt and vest straps as a possible restraint for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #2) observed with a wheelchair seat belt and vest straps . Failure to assess the wheelchair seatbelt and vest straps as possible restraints, monitor their use, and evaluate the need for continued use placed Resident #2 at risk for an unnecessary restraint and injury related to their use.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the current status for 3 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #2, #63, and #99). Failure to review and revise the care plan limited staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
  3. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 1 supplemental resident (Resident #135) observed during medication administration. Failure of staff to ensure residents swallowed medications, reported behaviors during medication administration, and re-administered unswallowed or refused medications may lead to adverse health conditions.
  4. D
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and family interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities designed to meet the interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #60) dependent on staff for activities. Failure to provide meaningful activities for residents limited Resident #60's ability to reach her highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
  5. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of professional reference, review of facility policy, and family interview, the facility failed to offer fluids to 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #60) who were observed during cares and required staff assistance for fluid intake. Failure to provide assistance with fluid intake may result in dehydration, constipation, and urinary tract infections (UTIs).
  6. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy and procedure review, professional reference review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#79 and #99) on hemodialysis with an arterial-venous fistula (vascular access for hemodialysis). Failure to assess the hemodialysis vascular access site (fistula) may result in complications and adverse effects, such as clotting and possible loss of the access site.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 3 of 10 sampled residents (#60, #124, and #131) observed during cares. Failure to follow infection control standards during perineal cares and with transmission-based precautions (TBP) has the potential to transmit infections to residents, staff, and visitors.
January 31, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident investigation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of hazards for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1) injured while consuming a hot beverage. Failure to provide the appropriate adaptive drinking aids with a mug for hot beverages contributed to Resident #1's injuries This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following the incident.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on July 1, 2026.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. F
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · July 1, 2026 · deficient, provider has

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
July 22, 2025Fine $17,345
January 23, 2025Fine $11,190
January 2, 2025Fine $6,788

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.094.423.86
Registered nurses0.730.930.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.623.803.42
Nurse aides3.70
Licensed practical nurses0.66
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)49.3%48.8%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover36.0%40.3%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.28 on weekdays and 4.62 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.10 in April to June 2025 to 5.09 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.090.735.284.62 5.4%0 of 90133
Oct to Dec 20255.140.805.294.76 4.1%0 of 92133
Jul to Sep 20254.980.805.144.57 5.0%0 of 92134
Apr to Jun 20255.100.795.304.60 7.5%0 of 91134
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Dakota, Jan to Mar 20264.570.924.813.9611.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for North Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
North Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.03$17.51 to $23.066,840
LPNs and LVNs$29.95$28.03 to $31.261,920
Registered nurses$38.81$33.47 to $44.7511,340
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Baptist Health & Rehab. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.319.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.72.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.45.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.117.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.84.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.022.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.319.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.211.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.51.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.81.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Baptist Health & Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

43.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · North Dakota: 0 better, 21 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 103 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · North Dakota: 2 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 158 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · North Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 107 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

38.1% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota50.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 97 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 120 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.3% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota2.9% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 120 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: North Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BAPTIST HOME, INC. CMS links this home to Cassia, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 4.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Elim Care Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%11/26/2009
Grosz, GeraldCorporate directorIndividual07/11/2013
Grubb, DarrelCorporate directorIndividual01/10/2013
Grupp, JamesCorporate directorIndividual06/09/2009
Just, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual01/23/2020
Malard, MaysilCorporate directorIndividual03/29/2011
Sotebeer, DennisCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2016
Tangedahl, GuyCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2007
Wright, BrianCorporate directorIndividual01/23/2020
Dahl, RobertCorporate officerIndividual11/26/2009
Kern, MatthewCorporate officerIndividual02/28/2019
Youngquist, KathrynCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2009
Cassia ServicesOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2020
Berg, DeannaOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on July 22, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2025: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 7, 2024: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."

Other nursing homes nearby

North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Baptist Health & Rehab's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Baptist Health & Rehab 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Baptist Health & Rehab get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 1, 2026. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
Has Baptist Health & Rehab been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 3 fines totaling $35,323 in the last three years.
Does Baptist Health & Rehab accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Baptist Health & Rehab?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Cassia. Legal business name: BAPTIST HOME, INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection