Find a nursing home

Home / South Dakota / Tyndall

Good Samaritan Society Tyndall

2304 Laurel Street, Tyndall, SD 57066 · Bon Homme County · (605) 589-3350

68 certified beds, about 53 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 435098 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the South Dakota average is 6.7, the national average 9.2).

Of 14 health citations since September 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 3 fines totaling $44,951 in the last three years; the largest was $23,537, and the latest is dated July 17, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across South Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

58.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Dakota average 48.2%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
4G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
5D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 16, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to implement pressure ulcer (skin and/or underlying tissue injury from prolonged pressure) prevention interventions for one of one sampled resident (11) who was identified as having a mild risk for developing a pressure ulcer and developed a stage IV (4; open wound with full-thickness skin and tissue loss. Bone, tendon, or muscle may be visible) pressure ulcer to her right antecubital space (the shallow triangular depression directly in front of the elbow joint).
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure a homelike environment was maintained for two of fourteen sampled residents (18 and 32) who did not have a bathroom door and four of fourteen sampled residents (10, 24, 35, and 44) whose walls in their rooms had exposed drywall and peeling paint.
  3. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy reviews, the provider failed to ensure staff members responded to call lights promptly for two of two sampled residents (2 and 4) who reported concerns regarding extended call light wait times.
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, record review, policy review, and manufacturer user guide review, the provider failed to ensure respiratory care was provided one of one sampled resident (18) who had a physician's order for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy (a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea by delivering a steady, gentle stream of pressurized air through a tube and mask) when she slept, and could not use it due to the mask unsnapping during the night.
July 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to assess for potential accident hazards and safety related to the usage of a lift chair for one of one sampled resident (1) and was transferred to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation and treatment of injuries acquired from the fall.
June 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint report review, interview, document review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure full investigations had been completed to rule out potential misappropriation of controlled medications (high risk for addiction, dependence, abuse, and theft) found to be missing during the controlled medication count between nursing shifts for four of six sampled residents (5, 6, 7, and 8) with physician-ordered controlled medications.
  2. D
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    F741 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure suicide risks evaluation had been completed for one of one sampled resident (1) by two of two nurses (E and G) who had documented the resident's comments of not wanting to live anymore to address his observed and expressed changes in his mental health.
January 24, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls for two of two sampled residents (22 and 55) who fell and sustained injuries.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to follow infection prevention practices by not having ensured: *Shared resident lift equipment (at least six different stand aids) was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner per the manufacturer's recommendations. *One of one registered nurse (RN) (G) used a clean utensil to open a packet of powdered nutrition supplement and performed appropriate hand hygiene during an observed medication administration.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the provider failed to revise and update a care plan for one of fifteen sampled residents (22) to reflect her care needs for supervision while using the bathroom.
  4. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled diabetic resident (33) was free from a potential insulin medication error.
September 28, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (23 and 42) who were identified as at risk for developing pressure ulcers indicated by the Braden Scale for Prediction Pressure Ulcer scores had interventions in place to prevent those residents acquiring a pressure ulcer.
  2. E
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure two of seven residents (16 and 35) who were at nutritional risk received ongoing monitoring of nutrition and revisions in care as their nutritional intake, dining assistance, and revisions in care as their nutritional status changed.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (14) had a diagnosis for the continued use of an indwelling urinary catheter after her wounds had healed.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 5 on July 16, 2026, 2 on January 24, 2025, 1 on September 28, 2023.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. D
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · July 16, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  2. D
    Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
    E 13 · July 16, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  3. D
    List the names and contact information of those in the facility.
    E 30 · July 16, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  4. D
    Meet other general requirements.
    K 200 · July 16, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  5. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · July 16, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  6. D
    Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
    K 131 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 28, 2023 · Waiver

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
July 17, 2025Fine $9,246
January 24, 2025Fine $23,537
September 28, 2023Fine $12,168

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.583.793.86
Registered nurses0.610.800.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.033.263.42
Nurse aides2.39
Licensed practical nurses0.58
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)58.5%48.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%34.7%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.50 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.80 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.580.613.803.03 0.8%0 of 9053
Oct to Dec 20253.600.623.783.15 0.0%0 of 9255
Jul to Sep 20253.620.683.813.14 0.0%0 of 9255
Apr to Jun 20253.490.673.692.98 0.0%0 of 9156
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
South Dakota, Jan to Mar 20263.760.793.973.259.1%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for South Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
South Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.65$17.71 to $21.126,860
LPNs and LVNs$25.36$23.88 to $29.472,050
Registered nurses$37.53$31.29 to $40.5214,710
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Good Samaritan Society Tyndall. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.021.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.62.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.62.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.05.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.12.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.519.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.34.64.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
29.724.615.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.81.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.81.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Good Samaritan Society Tyndall's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · South Dakota: 7 better, 10 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 13 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 10.7% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

34.8% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota52.7% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota1.1% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota2.5% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Morrison, TonyW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2019
Schenkel, JulieW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/10/1991
Cain, JamesCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2020
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Rogers, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual06/13/2022
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 24, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.03 hours per resident per day, below the South Dakota average of 3.26.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

South Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in South Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan Society Tyndall's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society Tyndall 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society Tyndall get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 16, 2026. The South Dakota average is 6.7.
Has Good Samaritan Society Tyndall been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 3 fines totaling $44,951 in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan Society Tyndall accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan Society Tyndall?
CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection