Find a nursing home

Home / Alabama / Goodwater

Goodwater Healthcare Center

16 Jones Hill Road, Goodwater, AL 35072 · Coosa County · (256) 839-6711

72 certified beds, about 62 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015204 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 15, 2021, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 5 health citations since March 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.63 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.

37.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).

CMS links it to Prime Health Care Enterprises, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 5 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
2D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
April 15, 2021Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 14, 2019Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 15, 2018Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to assess residents to determine if side rail use was appropriate, as well determine the residents' risk of entrapment. Further, no alternative approaches were attempted prior to using the side rails, and no informed consent was obtained from either the residents or their representatives prior to utilizing side rails. These failures affected Resident Identifier (RI) #s 13 and 28, two of seven sampled residents reviewed for side rail use, and had the potential to affect all 33 residents with orders and/or careplans in place for side rail use. The facility provided a Census List identifying 33 residents that utilized side rails out of total facility census of 62.
  2. E
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to identify and address concerns related to the facility's side rail usage process. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #s 13 and 28, two of seven sampled residents reviewed for side rail use, and had the potential to affect all 33 residents with orders and/or careplans in place for side rail use. The facility provided a Census List identifying 33 residents that utilized side rails out of a total facility census of 62. Findings Include: Cross Reference F700. During the recertification survey from 03/13-03/15/2018, the survey team identified concerns with side rail and entrapment risk assessments, lack of alternatives attempted prior to side rail use, and no informed consent for RI #s 13 and 28's side rails. [...]
  3. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed after Resident Identifier (RI) #13's admission to Hospice on 3/12/2017. This affected one of 19 sampled residents for whom MDS Assessments were reviewed.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and review of Nursing Inservice information, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Registered Nurse (RN), labeled a multiple dose insulin vial for Resident Identifier (RI) #32 with an expiration date after the vial was opened. This deficient practice was observed during one of 25 medication pass opportunities.
  5. C
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a notice of the availability of the previous three years of survey results was posted for residents and/or visitors. This had the potential to affect all 62 of 62 residents residing in the facility and any visitors.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on March 15, 2018.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. E
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · March 15, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.633.883.86
Registered nurses0.550.650.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.883.263.42
Nurse aides3.27
Licensed practical nurses0.81
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)37.8%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover25.0%39.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.93 on weekdays and 3.88 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.11 in April to June 2025 to 4.63 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.630.554.933.88 0.0%0 of 9062
Oct to Dec 20254.910.545.264.03 0.0%0 of 9262
Jul to Sep 20254.760.555.163.75 0.0%0 of 9260
Apr to Jun 20255.110.735.613.83 0.0%0 of 9156
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Alabama, Jan to Mar 20263.880.634.133.270.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.112.013.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.60.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.42.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.33.33.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.212.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.35.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
50.021.215.4

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GOODWATER HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Prime Health Care Enterprises, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Prime Healthcare Enterprise LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization05/28/2004
Servisfirst Bank5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization03/28/2012
Chapman, ArchieW-2 managing employeeIndividual07/29/2016
Chapman, ArchieCorporate directorIndividual07/29/2016
Prime Management, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/18/2003

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 15, 2018: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
  2. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 15, 2018: "Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 15, 2018: "Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition"
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 15, 2018: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Alabama contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Goodwater Healthcare Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Goodwater Healthcare Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Goodwater Healthcare Center get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 15, 2021. The Alabama average is 4.
Has Goodwater Healthcare Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Goodwater Healthcare Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Goodwater Healthcare Center?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers, and links the home to Prime Health Care Enterprises. Legal business name: GOODWATER HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection