Find a nursing home

Home / Alabama / Sylacauga

Coosa Valley Healthcare Center

260 West Walnut Street, Sylacauga, AL 35150 · Talladega County · (256) 249-5604

85 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015010 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2022, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 5 health citations since June 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.82 of those hours.

46.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).

CMS links it to Prime Health Care Enterprises, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 5 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
3D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 9, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations
June 13, 2019Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, PREPARATION AND GENERAL GUIDELINES, the facility failed to ensure: 1) a licensed nurse did not place Resident Identifier (RI) #53's medication on the over bed table, then into her pocket, prior to placing the medication back into the medication cart; and 2) a licensed nurse washed her hands prior to preparing RI #31's medications. These failures affected RI #s 31 and 53, two of five residents, and two of four nurses, observed during medication administration observations. Findings Include: 1) On 6/12/19 at 4:34 p.m., during medication administration observations, Employee Identifier (EI) #3, a Licensed Practical Nurse, removed medication (eye drops) from the medication cart, placed the medication on RI #53's overbed table, then stored the medication in her pocket while administering other medications. [...]
June 7, 2018Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled . SUBJECT: Food and Supply Storage Procedures and review of the 2017 Food Code, the facility failed to ensure: 1.) a dented can of pineapple chunks was removed from stock rotation; 2.) Glucerna TF was not stored past the manufacturer's use by date; and 3.) raw chicken was not stored directly over coed/prepared pork tenderloins. These failures had the potential to affect all 60 residents receiving meals from the dietary department.
  2. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2018
    Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #12 was assessed to determine the need for side rails and the risk of entrapment prior to utilizing two upper side rails. Further the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to applying side rails for RI #12. This affected RI #12 one of one resident sampled for siderail use but had the potential to affect 28 of 64 total residents in the facility identified by staff as using side rails.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an individualized care plan was developed to address Resident Identifier (RI) #12's use of side rails. This affected one of 16 sampled residents for whom care plans were reviewed.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, Gloving, the facility failed to ensure a licensed staff member wore gloves when administering a subcutaneous injection to Resident Identifier (RI) #7 on 6/06/2018. This affected one of three residents observed for subcutaneous injections during medication administration observations.

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 9, 2022, 4 on June 13, 2019, 2 on June 7, 2018.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · April 9, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 9, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · April 9, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 13, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 13, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 13, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · June 13, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · June 7, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 7, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.283.883.86
Registered nurses0.820.650.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.373.263.42
Nurse aides2.57
Licensed practical nurses0.89
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)46.7%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover23.1%39.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.65 on weekdays and 3.37 on weekends, 28% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.43 in April to June 2025 to 4.28 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.280.824.653.37 0.0%0 of 9080
Oct to Dec 20254.410.854.743.54 0.0%0 of 9278
Jul to Sep 20254.330.784.633.58 0.0%0 of 9278
Apr to Jun 20254.430.804.853.37 0.0%0 of 9175
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Alabama, Jan to Mar 20263.880.634.133.270.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Alabama

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Alabama, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$16.41$14.45 to $17.4925,250
LPNs and LVNs$27.42$23.15 to $29.7111,580
Registered nurses$37.06$30.53 to $40.0954,340
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.012.013.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.20.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.92.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.43.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.92.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.012.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.55.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.021.215.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
33.824.823.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.611.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.02.01.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.11.71.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Coosa Valley Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

59.8% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Alabama: 41 better, 10 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 106 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Alabama: 1 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Alabama: 0 better, 1 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 74 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

20.8% this home

Median of homes: Alabama50.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 48 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.5% this home

Median of homes: Alabama0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.6% this home

Median of homes: Alabama2.1% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Alabama100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COOSA VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Prime Health Care Enterprises, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Chapman, ArchieCorporate directorIndividual11/16/2018
Chapman, ArchieCorporate officerIndividual11/16/2018
Prime Management, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/16/2018
Chapman, ArchieOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/16/2018

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2019: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 7, 2018: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 7, 2018: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 7, 2018: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."

Other nursing homes nearby

Alabama contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Coosa Valley Healthcare Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Coosa Valley Healthcare Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Coosa Valley Healthcare Center get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 9, 2022. The Alabama average is 4.
Has Coosa Valley Healthcare Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Coosa Valley Healthcare Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Coosa Valley Healthcare Center?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to Prime Health Care Enterprises. Legal business name: COOSA VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection