Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Cambridge

Gracepointe Crossing Gables

1601 Riverhills Parkway Northwest, Cambridge, MN 55008 · Isanti County · (763) 689-1474

110 certified beds, about 104 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245432 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 4, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 7 health citations since July 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.08 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.70 of those hours.

40.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

CMS links it to Presbyterian Homes & Services, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 7 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
2D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 4, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a palatable diet by serving cold food at a temperature over 40 degrees. This had the potential to affect 17 residents who resided in the memory care unit.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure glucometers (a device used to monitor blood sugar levels) were appropriately disinfected between uses, for 1 of 4 residents (R85) in the sample who had a blood sugar check by a unit glucose meter. This had the potential to affect all four residents on 2nd Floor North unit who received scheduled blood sugar checks. In addition, the facility failed ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn by staff while assisting 1 of 1 resident (R79) on contact precautions.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) assessment was correctly coded for 1 of 5 residents (R4) in the sample reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: R4's PointClickCare (PCC) (electronic medical record) diagnosis listing documented resident had the diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, morbid obesity due to excess calories and intestinal bypass. R4's last comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated resident moderately cognitively impaired and was independent with activities of daily living (ADLS). A review of R4's PCC Physician Orders, last updated 9/4/25, R4 was prescribed the following medication: [...]
August 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure care-planned interventions for safety with hot beverages were consistently implemented to reduce the risk of accident and injury for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed who required lids on their hot beverages. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who was served a cup of hot tea without a lid and spilled it onto herself causing multiple second-degree burns. However, the facility had taken multiple corrective action(s) prior to the onsite survey so these
June 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide safe transfers for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who required gait belts (transfer belt) for transfer and ambulation assistance. This resulted in actual harm when R1 was being ambulated without a gaitbelt, fell, and sustained a fracture of the shoulder. The facility implemented corrective action prior to the investigation, so the deficiency was issued at Past Noncompliance.
June 13, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 3, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and determine safety for 1 of 1 residents (R205) reviewed for self-administration of medications (SAM).
July 21, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (R89, R44, R37, R103) were offered or provided the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV20) in accordance with the Center for Disease (CDC) recommendations.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 4, 2025, 2 on June 13, 2024, 5 on July 21, 2023.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · September 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · September 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · September 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · July 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · July 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · July 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. C
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · July 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.084.193.86
Registered nurses0.701.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.813.713.42
Nurse aides2.65
Licensed practical nurses0.72
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)40.8%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover20.0%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.18 on weekdays and 3.81 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.10 in April to June 2025 to 4.08 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.080.704.183.81 0.0%0 of 90104
Oct to Dec 20254.110.734.243.77 0.0%0 of 92100
Jul to Sep 20254.110.714.253.76 0.0%0 of 92103
Apr to Jun 20254.100.684.243.76 0.0%0 of 91106
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.118.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.01.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.62.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.14.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.320.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.75.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.117.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.423.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.814.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.91.61.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.61.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GRANDVIEW CHRISTIAN HOME. CMS links this home to Presbyterian Homes & Services, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Presbyterian Homes and Services5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%03/11/2011
Us Bank, N.a.5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization10/31/2016
Us Bank, N.a.5% or greater security interestOrganization10/31/2016
Fletcher, JonathanCorporate directorIndividual02/01/2025
Pederson, MarkCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2023
Peterson, HeidiCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2023
Fletcher, JonathanCorporate officerIndividual02/01/2025
Pederson, MarkCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2023
Peterson, HeidiCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2023
Phs Management, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization03/11/2011
Bucklew, RaquelOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/23/2023
Dick, StanleyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2014
Fletcher, JonathanOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/01/2025
Meyer, MarkOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/11/2011
Peterson, HeidiOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2023
Fletcher, JonathanIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual03/23/2026
Phs Management, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/25/2025
Bucklew, RaquelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/23/2023
Dick, StanleyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2014
Fletcher, JonathanAdp of the SNFIndividual02/01/2025
Meyer, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual03/11/2011
Peterson, HeidiAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 4, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on September 4, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on September 4, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Gracepointe Crossing Gables's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Gracepointe Crossing Gables 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Gracepointe Crossing Gables get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 4, 2025. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Gracepointe Crossing Gables been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Gracepointe Crossing Gables accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Gracepointe Crossing Gables?
CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Presbyterian Homes & Services. Legal business name: GRANDVIEW CHRISTIAN HOME.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection