Grapevine Medical Lodge
1005 Ira E. Woods Parkway, Grapevine, TX 76051 · Tarrant County · (817) 421-1313
132 certified beds, about 92 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676104 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 15, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 8 health citations since December 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.15 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
26.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Priority Management, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
212/22
003/24
604/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
3D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 15, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for 1 (Resident # 75) of 1 residents reviewed for enteral feedings The facility failed to assess Resident #75 to self-administer her feeds via the g-tube three times a day since admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met and a decline in resident's health.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents, for two Residents (Res#24 and Res#196) of two residents reviewed for medication use, in that: MA administered Resident #24's Gabapentin (ordered for treatment of pain) and Resident #196's Creon Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles 3000-9500 Unit (ordered for Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency) greater than one hour after the scheduled administration time. Resident #24 and Resident #196 did not receive their scheduled 8:00 am medications until after 9:30 am on 04/14/2025. MA was arriving on the Hall 4 with medication cart to begin the Med pass at 9:30 am. [...]
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored in locked compartments for 1 of 8 medication carts (Med Cart A) reviewed for drug security. The facility did not lock Med cart A when unattended and not in use on 04/13/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medications loss, drug diversion, or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed medications. Findings Include: In an observation on 04/13/25 at 08:58 AM and at 09:13 AM, it was revealed Med Cart A was unlocked and unattended with the lock mechanism out (indicating it was unlocked) by the main nursing station facing outwards to the entrance foyer. Residents, family, staff and four surveyors were walking by the unlocked medication cart. No facility staff was attending to or using Med Cart A; it was not in use and unlocked. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure that containers in the refrigerator were covered and labeled. 2. The facility failed to ensure that prepared food was tightly covered in the facility's only refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illnesses.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #75) of 1 resident reviewed for Care plan in that: The facility failed to care plan Resident #75 self-feeding via the g-tube three times a day since admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met and a decline in resident's health.
- D Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review, the facility failed to ensure Parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for one (Resident #246) of four residents reviewed for intravenous fluids. The facility failed to change Resident #246's PICC line dressing which was loose, unsealed, and not intact before administering her antibiotic on 04/13/25. This failure could place residents at risk for catheter related blood stream infection.
March 7, 2024Standard inspection · 0 citations
December 14, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their activities program was directed by a qualified professional for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Activity Director Qualifications. The facility did not ensure the Activity Director completed the required training to serve as the director of the activities program. This failure could place residents at risk of not having an overall skilled and knowledgeable Activities Director to direct an effective activities program, which could result in the residents not receiving activities to meet their needs.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (LVN C and MA D) of 2 staff observed for infection control practices. While administering Resident #77's medications, LVN C did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between touching the PEG tube, feeding pump tubing, syringe, and bed sheet and putting her hand in a cup of water to retrieve the medication stirrer. MA D failed to touch medication dose cups on exterior surfaces only. These failures could place residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination of pathogens and illness.
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on April 15, 2025, 3 on March 7, 2024, 1 on December 14, 2022.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
- F Meet Health Care Facilities Code mechanical requirements.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.15 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.75 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.85 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 26.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.37 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.31 on weekdays and 2.75 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.21 in April to June 2025 to 3.15 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.15 | 0.44 | 3.31 | 2.75 | 3.5% | 0 of 90 | 92 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.12 | 0.44 | 3.26 | 2.76 | 1.8% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.13 | 0.38 | 3.25 | 2.81 | 2.2% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.21 | 0.32 | 3.37 | 2.81 | 3.2% | 1 of 91 | 93 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DECATUR HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Priority Management, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decatur Hospital Authority | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/01/2014 |
| Caretrust Reit Inc | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Ctr Partnership LP | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Scroggins, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2014 | |
| Pmg Opco-Grapevine LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Taggart, Douglas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Bauder, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2025 | |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/18/2025 | |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2025 | |
| Bridgepointe Finanical Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Caretrust Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Innovative Nurse Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Pmg Opco-Grapevine LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/18/2025 | |
| Priority Management Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2014 | |
| Siddiqui, Mohamad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2014 | |
| Taggart, Douglas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2025: "Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 15, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 15, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.75 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avir at Grapevine Grapevine, 1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Bear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Grapevine, 2.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park Southlake, 6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Keller Oaks Healthcare Center Keller, 6.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Discovery Village at Southlake Southlake, 6.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Forum Parkway Health & Rehabilitation Bedford, 6.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- La Dora Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Bedford, 6.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Las Brisas Rehabilitation and Wellness Center Irving, 7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Grapevine Medical Lodge's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Grapevine Medical Lodge 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Grapevine Medical Lodge get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 15, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Grapevine Medical Lodge been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Grapevine Medical Lodge accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Grapevine Medical Lodge?
- CMS lists 18 owners and managers, and links the home to Priority Management. Legal business name: DECATUR HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.