Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Hartville

Hartville Care Center

649 West Rolla Street, Hartville, MO 65667 · Wright County · (417) 741-6192

58 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265593 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 19, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 10 health citations since May 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.05 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

36.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to James & Judy Lincoln, an affiliated group of 56 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
3D
1E
5F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free accidents when staff failed to transfer one resident (Resident #1) per the resident's care plan and therapy assessment/direction resulting in a fall and bilateral tibia plateau fractures (break in the top of the shinbones). The facility census was 43. Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer Activities, undated, showed the following:-To transfer the resident from bed to chair, toilet, or tub safely with mechanical lift, or positioning devices, obtain assistance of another individual if necessary for safe transfer;-Obtain equipment from designated area and bring it to bedside. 1. [...]
June 19, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was protected from potential contamination when staff failed to ensure the air gap for the ice machine had the required two inch gap between the drain in the floor and the tubing from the ice machine and when staff failed to ensure the stove top burners used to cook food for the residents were clean and free from grease. The facility census was 40. 1. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed an air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture, equipment, or nonfood equipment shall be at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and may not be less than one inch. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to the air gap. Observation on 06/16/25, at 10:05 A.M., and 06/19/25, at 11:00 A.M., showed an ice machine located in the kitchen. [...]
  2. F
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and functional environment when staff failed to keep the walk-in cooler floor maintained and cleanable. The facility census was 40. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to the floor of the walk-in cooler. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Codes showed the following: -Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris; -Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment that are exposed to splash, spillage, or other food soiling or that require frequent cleaning shall be constructed of a corrosion-resistant, nonabsorbent, and smooth material; -Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues; [...]
  3. F
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    F925 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control system to control the flies when flies were present in two residents' rooms (Resident #2 and Resident #24) and in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control, undated, showed the following: -Purpose was to provide an environment free of pests; -The facility will have a pest control contract which provides frequency treatment of the environment for pests. It will allow for additional visits when a problem is detected; -Monitoring the environment will be done by the facility's staff; -Pest control problems will be reported promptly. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (admission data) showed an admission date of 11/05/21 and a readmisison date of 03/14/25. [...]
  4. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff failed to ensure staff changed and stored oxygen equipment per professional standards and when staff failed to care plan oxygen usage for two residents (Resident #22 and #10). The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's Oxygen Equipment Policy, undated, showed the following: -Disposable oxygen equipment will be discarded after each use; -Humidifier must be emptied and refilled every 24 hours with distilled water; -Humidifiers are to be dated, initialed, and replaced monthly; -Tubing, masks, and cannulas used with oxygen therapy should be replaced monthly and as needed. 1. Review of Resident #22's face sheet (a document that gives resident's basic information) showed the following: -admission date of 11/11/23; [...]
  5. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for all residents, when staff failed to document in the medical record an injury and change of condition for one resident (Resident #36). The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Event Investigation, undated, showed the following: -Purpose was to investigate the cause of all marks, discoloration, skin breaks, and injuries which have not been witnessed and to identify any injuries after a resident sustains an event; -Complete a report of event form as soon as possible whenever there is an unusual, unexpected and/or unintended event; -Any staff member who discovers, witnesses, or is involved in an event should immediately report the event to the nurse in charge; [...]
November 3, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to keep the ice machine clean, failed to ensure the dishwasher chemicals tested at the recommended levels, and did not wear proper hair coverings. The facility census was 28. 1. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed food-contact surfaces of equipment and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. Observations of the kitchen on 10/30/23, beginning at 9:47 A.M., and on 10/31/23, at 8:59 AM., showed the deflector shield on the inside of the ice machine had five black spots and a black substance along most of the bottom of the deflector shield. Review of the facility's weekly cleaning schedule, dated October 2023, showed the following: -Ice machine listed as being cleaned weekly; [...]
  2. F
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for all residents, staff, and visitors when staff failed to ensure fans and areas around fans located in the walk-in refrigerator and the vents on the ice machine were cleaned; failed to replace a missing vent cover on the side of the ice machine; and failed to repair the vent cover broken the other side of the ice machine. The facility census was 28. 1. Review showed the facility did not provide policies related to cleaning related to the fans in the refrigerator. Observations of the kitchen on 10/30/23, beginning at 9:47 A.M., and on 10/31/2023, at 8:59 AM., showed two fans located at the back of the refrigerator had fuzzy gray lint and a build-up of lint above the fan on the left side. [...]
May 13, 2021Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within two hours of staff becoming aware of the allegation of abuse when one resident (Resident #5) made allegations of physical and sexual abuse. The facility census was 28. Record review of the facility's abuse policy titled, Reporting, from Section 1 of the Abuse Prohibition Manual, undated, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to encourage and support all residents, staff, families, visitors, volunteers, and resident representatives in reporting any suspected acts of abuse; -The nursing home administrator or designee will report abuse to the state agency per state and federal requirements; [...]
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete full and timely investigations of allegations of abuse when one resident (Resident #5) made allegations of physical and sexual abuse. The facility census was 28. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Investigation, from Section 7 of the facility's, Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual (undated) showed: -It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated; -When an incident or suspected incident of abuse is reported, the administrator will investigate the incident with the assistance of appropriate personnel. The investigation will include: [...]

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on November 3, 2023.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · November 3, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
    K 753 · November 3, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.053.433.86
Registered nurses0.610.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.693.013.42
Nurse aides2.26
Licensed practical nurses0.18
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)36.7%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover20.0%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.19 on weekdays and 2.69 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.23 in April to June 2025 to 3.05 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.050.613.192.69 0.0%0 of 9043
Oct to Dec 20253.230.733.382.85 0.0%0 of 9241
Jul to Sep 20253.240.703.442.73 0.0%0 of 9242
Apr to Jun 20253.230.773.422.76 0.0%0 of 9139
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Hartville Care Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.118.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.72.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.04.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.12.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.317.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.34.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.323.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.426.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.113.712.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hartville Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

80.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: N & R OF HARTVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to James & Judy Lincoln, a group of 56 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Lincoln, James5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%11/01/2013
Lincoln, Judy5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%11/01/2013
Cryer, Natasha NW-2 managing employeeIndividual02/01/2014
LTC Management Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/01/2013

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 24, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 13, 2021: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.69 hours per resident per day, below the Missouri average of 3.01.

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Hartville Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Hartville Care Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Hartville Care Center get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 19, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Hartville Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Hartville Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Hartville Care Center?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to James & Judy Lincoln. Legal business name: N & R OF HARTVILLE LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection