Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation
6001 George Bush Dr, Katy, TX 77493 · Harris County · (281) 395-1124
118 certified beds, about 112 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676221 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 19, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 16 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $25,508 in the last three years; the largest was $25,508, and the latest is dated September 30, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
43.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Oakbend Medical Center, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
July 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider and before transferring or discharging to send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 2 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for proper discharge. -The facility did not send a copy of Resident #2's 30-day discharge notice of the intended discharge date to the Ombudsman at the same time the facility notified Resident #2 on 06/17/2026. The Ombudsman was first notified of Resident #2's discharge on [DATE] by e-mail exchange. [...]
February 19, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled drug counts were in order and reconciled for two of two medication carts observed during change-of-shift. -Two medication carts controlled medication counts were conducted without staff cross-checking the medications cards and controlled medication count sheets. -The staff did not state the name of the medication when calling out the resident name and quantity. -The facility policy did not require both staff to confirm the quantity being verbalized was the quantity written on the controlled medication count sheet. The failure placed residents at risk for controlled medications to not be available when needed, and for controlled drug diversion.
November 7, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen in that: -Five dented cans were stored with other cans used for resident meals in the dry storage room. -Food items were not sealed and not dated in the dry storage room. These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Residents with a positive trigger for mental illness were provided with a PASRR Level II assessment for 1 (Resident #79) of 5 residents reviewed for mental illness. The facility did not correctly identify Resident #79 as having mental illness in her PASRR Level 1 Screening. This failure could place five residents with psychiatric diagnoses to trigger a positive PASRR Level I evaluation at risk for not receiving a PASRR Level II screening and receiving needed care and services to meet their needs.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care for 1 (Resident #26) of 31 residents reviewed for base-line care plans. The facility failed to ensure (Resident #26) had a baseline care plan developed within 48-hours after admission with goals based on admission orders and interventions, PASRR recommendations, Physician's orders, therapy services, dietary orders, and social services. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risks of not receiving the proper care and continuity of services.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for one (100 Hall Nurse Medication Cart) of four medication carts reviewed for storage of medications. The Nurse Medication Cart for 100 Hall had a torn protective seal on the back of Resident #211's Tramadol HCL 50mg (a narcotic used to treat moderately severe pain) medication blister pill card (a type of medication packaging, with multiple small, sealed compartments that hold individual doses of medication) found in the locked narcotic drawer during review of medication carts. This failure could place all residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, adverse reactions to medications, infection, and drug diversion.
March 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1, and Resident #3) reviewed for incontinent care. - 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's foley tubing was not touching the floor while Resident #1 was propelling himself between the nursing station and medication room. - 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 3's foley bag and tubing were not touching the floor while Resident #2 was laid in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 2of 5 residents (Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to have call light was within reach for Resident #2 and Resident #3 while the residents was in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in care and services, increased falls, and a decreased quality of life.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was provided personal grooming (fingernail care) by facility staff. This failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, and dignity issues.
September 30, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- J Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #50) - The facility failed to care plan Resident #50's risk and history of falls and to put interventions in place to prevent further falls. The care plan was not updated or revised after each fall. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/24/23 at 2:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/26/23 at 4:32 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and decreased the quality of life to prevent further falls.
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for free of accidents, hazards, supervision, and devices., in that: 1. The facility failed to provide and utilize assistive devices for Resident #50 who had experienced multiple falls and unwitnessed fall on 7/25/23. Interventions including assistive devices were not put in place after a fall on 07/25/23 resulting in hospitalization and resident fell again on 07/26/23 resulting in a major head injury and another hospitalization 2. The facility failed to implement interventions after each fall incident for Resident #50 on 10/30/22, 12/2/22, 12/7/22, 1/5/2023, 3/18/23, 3/25/2023, 6/9/2023, 6/30/2023, 7/25/2023, 7/26/2023, 8/8/2023, 8/15/2023, 8/20/2023, 9/2/2023 and 9/3/2023. [...]
- E Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation , interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and neglect are thoroughly investigated and report results of the investigation to the stage agency within 5 working days of the incident for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #50 and #84) reviewed for allegations of neglect as evidence by: 1. The facility failed to report an unwitnessed fall to the state agency when Resident #84 was found on the floor had a large hematoma to the top of her head and was transferred to the hospital . Resident #84 could not state how she fell. 2. The facility failed to report an unwitnessed fall to the state agency when Resident #50 was found on the floor. Resident #50 was sent to hospital on 7/25/23 and returned 12:30 AM on 7/26/2023. [...]
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service was provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #72) reviewed for dialysis services. The facility failed to keep ongoing communication with the dialysis facility for Resident #72. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 8 (Resident #32) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure that LVN A did not administered Resident #4's Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic (eye drop medication used to treat inflammation of the eyes) to Resident #32. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biological's used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable when applicable for 2 of 4 medication Carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication (med) chart 100-hall did not have the expired medications Packets of Arginaid ( Arginne powder) ( used to help support the unique nutritional needs of individuals with wounds). The facility failed to ensure the Nurses medication carts 300-hall did not have the opened and undated medications: [...]
- D Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an adequately furnished space for dining and activities for 1 of 1 dining room and 1 of 1 activity room reviewed for dining and activity rooms. The facility did not provide an adequately furnished dining room or activity room for dining and resident activities. This failure could place the residents at risk for psychosocial harm and decreased quality of life.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on February 19, 2026, 2 on November 7, 2024, 3 on September 30, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Ensure precautions for handling oxygen cylinders and equipment are correctly followed.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2023 | Fine | $25,508 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.86 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.66 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.96 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.42 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.99 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.94 on weekdays and 2.66 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.96 in April to June 2025 to 2.86 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.86 | 0.47 | 2.94 | 2.66 | 1.8% | 0 of 90 | 112 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.96 | 0.45 | 3.03 | 2.79 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.97 | 0.38 | 3.09 | 2.68 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.96 | 0.35 | 3.09 | 2.63 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 109 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 35.5 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.5 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER. CMS links this home to Oakbend Medical Center, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crayton, Tom | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Dorman, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Haley, Jeff | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| King, Abby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| King, Elizabeth | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Pisani, Adam | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Popatia, Amirali | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Stuart, Julius | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Uthman, Edward | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Health Management Partners LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/20/2024 | |
| Oakbend Medical Center | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/20/2024 | |
| Lacerda, Dennis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/20/2024 | |
| Lacerda, Felipe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/07/2025 | |
| Nall, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/20/2024 | |
| K.d. Gotcher, Ltd. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/20/2024 | |
| Gotcher, Karen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/20/2024 | |
| Khawaja, Mubarak | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/20/2024 | |
| Lacerda, Dennis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/03/2025 | |
| Lacerda, Felipe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/07/2025 | |
| Nall, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/20/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 19, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 7, 2024: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 7, 2024: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.66 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Sterling Oaks Rehabilitation Katy, 1.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Ignite Medical Resort Katy, LLC Katy, 2.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Paradigm at Katy Katy, 2.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Falcon Point Post Acute Katy, 2.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy Katy, 5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Ka Katy, 5.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Solera at West Houston Houston, 7.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Harmony Care at Brookshire Brookshire, 7.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 46 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on February 19, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $25,508 in the last three years.
- Does Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Oakbend Medical Center. Legal business name: OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.