Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC
1803 Wescott Avenue, Sugar Land, TX 77479 · Fort Bend County · (713) 325-1717
90 certified beds, about 58 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 2015
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676384 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 10, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 14 health citations since August 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 6 fines totaling $137,052 in the last three years; the largest was $83,496, and the latest is dated August 30, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.82 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
62.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Ignite Medical Resorts, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
June 30, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan area for Resident #1's use of a midline to receive IV antibiotics. This failure placed residents at risk for inconsistent care, complications related to midline catheter, and a decline in health status.
December 10, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of 2 (Residents #1 and #2) out of 8 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure a call light system was available for Resident #1. The facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for Resident #2. This failure has the potential to put residents at risk of not having their needs met when they are unable to contact staff.
September 27, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen when they failed to: A. Ensure stored food was properly labeled, dated, and contained. B. Ensure general cleanliness was maintained. C. Ensure substitution list, cleaning list and temperature logs were utilized. These failures could place all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one of six residents reviewed (Resident #18) for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 received services and treatment orders to prevent sacral pressure ulcers from healing. These failures could place residents at risk for worsening of existing wounds or development of new pressure ulcers.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteincontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #18) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A separated Resident #18's labia, cleaned the foley catheter insertion site and performed proper hand hygiene during foley care for Resident #18. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needs respiratory care, including tracheotomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of two residents reviewed for tracheotomy care (Resident #5). The facility failed to ensure RN R used sterile technique during tracheotomy care and suctioning for Resident #5. These failures could place residents with a tracheotomy requiring suctioning at risk for respiratory infections, hospitalizations, and a decline in their quality of life.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of 5 residents (Resident #177) reviewed for pharmacy services. LVN A failed to administer Lacosamide (medicine used to treat seizures), and Hydralazine (medicine used to lower blood pressure); to Resident #177 at 7:00am as ordered by the physician. LVN A failed to administer the whole dose of Hydralazine and Carvedilol (medicines used to lower blood pressure); Baclofen (medicine used as skeletal muscle relaxants); Glycopyrrolate (treats chronic obstructive pulmonary disease); Doxycycline (medicine used bacterial infections); and Isosorbide (medicine used to treat uncontrolled arterial hypertension) to Resident #177 as ordered by the physician. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 26% based on 8 errors out of 30 opportunities, which involved 1 of 5 residents (Resident #177) reviewed for medication errors. LVN A administered Lacosamide (medicine used to treat seizures), and Hydralazine (medicine used to lower blood pressure); to Resident #177 at 9:08am instead of 7:00am as ordered by the physician. LVN A administered the wrong dose of Hydralazine and Carvedilol (medicines used to lower blood pressure); Baclofen (medicine used as skeletal muscle relaxants); Glycopyrrolate (treats chronic obstructive pulmonary disease); Doxycycline (medicine used bacterial infections); [...]
- D Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed properly for 1 of 1 dumpster reviewed for garbage disposal. -The facility failed to ensure the dumpster floor were free of debris. This failure could place residents at risk of infection from improperly disposed garbage.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for infection control, in that: CNA A did not change her gloves or wash her hands after providing incontinent care to Resident #18. RN R did not change her gloves or wash her hands during pressure ulcer treatment and after providing treatment to Resident #18 RN R did not change her gloves or wash her hands and used sterile technique during tracheotomy care and suctioning for Resident #5. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.
August 30, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure personnel provided basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel for 1 to 7 residents (CR#1) reviewed for CPR. -RT A and LVN A failed to initiate life-saving measures (CPR) when CR#1 who had a full code (meaning all resuscitation procedures provided if their heart stops beating or stop breathing) immediately when she was found unresponsive and died. -The facility failed to ensure that CR #1 received Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with professional standards of practice. -The facility failed to immediately initiate CPR when CR#1 was found unresponsive at or about 5:25 a.m. EMS was called at 5:37 a.m. A delay of 12 minutes initiating CPR. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. [...]
- J Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards, the comprehensive care plan, the residents goals, and preferences for 1 of 5 (CR#1) residents reviewed for respiratory and tracheostomy care in that: -The facility failed to ensure that CR#1 who needed respiratory care, including tracheotomy care circuit was attached appropriately causing it to become dislodged resulting in agonal breathing, cardiac arrest, and death. -The facility failed to have emergency tracheostomy equipment at CR#1's bedside when CR#1 trach dislodged. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 05:42pm . The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:42pm. [...]
- J Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedure that assure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 (Resident #8) residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. -Facility failed to implement effective pharmaceutical procedures when RN A incorrectly added an order to Resident #8 to administer 12 units of Lispro insulin subcutaneously every 8 hours. Resident #8 who was not diabetic caused himcaused him to sweat and become lethargic and had to be sent to the emergency room due to hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). -The facility failed to prevent Resident #8 from receiving 48 units of insulin within 24-hours. [...]
August 9, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for medications received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding/medication administration including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, and metabolic abnormalities. -The nurse failed to verify placement of Resident #7's G-tube prior to administering medications. This failure could place residents at risk for complications from medications not entering the stomach.
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 5 on December 10, 2025, 3 on September 27, 2024, 5 on August 9, 2023.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 30, 2024 | Fine | $14,433 |
| August 30, 2024 | Fine | $14,433 |
| August 30, 2024 | Fine | $83,496 |
| August 30, 2024 | Payment Denial | 129 days from October 1, 2024 |
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $14,814 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.82 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.63 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.73 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.36 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 62.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.5% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.80 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.89 on weekdays and 3.63 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.20 in April to June 2025 to 3.82 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.82 | 0.72 | 3.89 | 3.63 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 58 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.68 | 0.74 | 3.74 | 3.50 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 60 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.80 | 0.88 | 3.91 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.20 | 1.33 | 5.36 | 4.82 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 25 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.0 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.9 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.4 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: IGNITE MEDICAL RESORT SUGAR LAND, LLC. CMS links this home to Ignite Medical Resorts, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2025 |
| Ignite Sugar Land Jv, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 06/01/2025 |
| Prestige Worldwide Sugar Land, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 06/01/2025 |
| Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Ignite Team Partners LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Carr, Barry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Fields, Timothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Washington, Rulkiya | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Berger, Aviva | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 10/28/2025 | |
| Israel, Benjamin | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 10/28/2025 | |
| Israel, Yehudis | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 10/28/2025 | |
| Stern, Todd | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 10/28/2025 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Ignite Team Partners LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Carr, Barry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Fields, Timothy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Oommen, Biju | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Washington, Rulkiya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on September 27, 2024: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 27, 2024: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 27, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 30, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Crescent Sugar Land, 1.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Sugar Land Health Care Center Sugar Land, 2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Paradigm at First Colony Missouri City, 3.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Chelsea Gardens Missouri City, 4.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Park Manor of Quail Valley Missouri City, 4.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare Missouri City, 5.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- West Houston Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Houston, 6.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Cambridge Health and Rehabilitation Center Richmond, 7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC get at its last inspection?
- 0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 10, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 6 fines totaling $137,052 in the last three years.
- Does Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC?
- CMS lists 18 owners and managers, and links the home to Ignite Medical Resorts. Legal business name: IGNITE MEDICAL RESORT SUGAR LAND, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.