2350 Fm 1092, Missouri City, TX 77459 · Fort Bend County · (281) 499-9333
125 certified beds, about 100 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2005
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676073 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 24, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since February 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.33 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.24 of those hours.
34.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hmg Healthcare, an affiliated group of 31 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 out of 32 residents (Resident #93 and Resident #13) reviewed for adequate supervision. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #93 who was on continuous oxygen did not smoke while oxygen was being administered from 03/20/25 through 06/03/25. The facility documented they found cigarettes and a lighter in Resident #93's room on 03/22/25 and was observed smoking while on oxygen in front of the facility on 4/18/25 and 06/03/25. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 bed rail/assistance bar was attached to the bed securely. when the rail/assistance bar was observed on the floor on 06/03/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #355) reviewed for privacy, in that: - The facility failed to place Resident #355's foley catheter bag inside of a privacy bag on 06/03/2025. These failures placed residents at risk for embarrassment, at risk of loss of dignity and decrease in quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 call light within reach while resident was in bed on 06/03/25. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in care and services, increased falls, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #20 and Resident #78) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #20's requirement for anticoagulants was a focus area in the resident's comprehensive care plan no date provided and no intervention was documented in place. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #155 and Resident #88) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA M cleaned Resident #155's indwelling Foley catheter properly and followed proper hand hygiene during incontinent care on 6/5/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure C.NA P cleaned Resident #88 properly during incontinent care on 6/5/25 These failures could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and sdministering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 medicationstorage room observed for expired medications in that: The facility failed- On 06/03/35 when there were 15 hydrocortisone acetate 25mg (a topical steroid used to treat pain, itching, and swelling in the rectum {the end of the large intestine where stool is stored until it exits the body through the anus} and anus,) suppositories (medication used to insert into the rectum) with an expiration date that read 05/2025. This medication belonged to CR #100 who discharged on 04/12/2025. This failure placed resident at risk for an unwanted adverse drug reaction had the resident not discharged from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 medication storage room. in that: The facility failed- On 06/03/35 when there were 15 hydrocortisone acetate 25mg (a topical steroid used to treat pain, itching, and swelling in the rectum {the end of the large intestine where stool is stored until it exits the body through the anus} and anus,) suppositories (medication used to insert into the rectum) with an expiration date that read 05/2025. This medication belonged to CR #100 who discharged on 04/12/2025. This failure placed resident at risk for an unwanted adverse drug reaction had the resident not discharged from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #155) and 1 of 2 staff (CNA M) reviewed for incontinent care and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #71) of 28 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA M washed or sanitized her hands and performed glove changes appropriately while providing incontinence care to Resident #155 on 06/05/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #71's foley catheter drainage bag was not resting on the resident's floor mat on 06/03/25. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 2 closed records (CR #1) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant (COTA) did not use CR#1's debit card resulting in CR #1 losing $45.00. 2. The facility failed to ensure the COTA did not use CR #1's cellphone to access CR #1's banking information resulting in CR #1 losing $250.00. These failures placed residents at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free of misappropriation of property and exploitation for 1 of 2 residents Closed Record (CR) #1 reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant (COTA) did not take CR#1's debit card without permission resulting in CR #1 losing $45.00. 2. The facility failed to ensure the COTA did not use CR #1's cellphone to access CR #1's banking information resulting $250.00 being taken from CR #1's account. These failures could affect residents and their responsible party by preventing them from having access to their funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy by securing signed consents for the use of security cameras for 1 of 2 (Resident #28) residents reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure CNA A closed Resident #52's door or pulled the curtain when repositioning Resident #52 This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment, and reduction of the self-esteem and self-worth by not being provided desired privacy during personal care or meetings with family or physicians.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment was completed within 7 and 14 days, and electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for a subset of items upon a resident's transfer, reentry, discharge, and death for 2 of 2 discharged residents (CR #73 and CR #76) reviewed for encoding and transmitting resident assessments, in that: - The Facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge MDS for CR #73. - The Facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge MDS for CR #76. This failure could place discharged residents at risk of not having a proper discharge and not receiving services post discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 1 of 4 residents (CR#93) reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility failed to accurately code CR#93's discharge MDS assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and services to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #52) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #52's care plan reflected he had a foley catheter. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care to meet their current needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A cleaned Resident #52's indwelling Foley catheter properly and followed proper hand hygiene during incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were accurately acquired, received, dispensed, and administered in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 1 resident (#447), 2 of 4 medication carts (400 hall nurse cart and 100 hall medication aide cart) and 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for medication storage. - At bedside of Resident #447 were Equate (brand name) lubricant eye drops 0.5 oz. - The 400-hall nurse's medication cart contained discontinued ipratropium bromide inhalation solution, sore throat spray, and genteel tears and there was no expiration date on medication: zinc oxide ointment skin protectant. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked storage area and to limit access to authorized personnel for 1 of 1 resident (#447) room reviewed for medication storage. -The facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked storage area and limited access to authorized personnel. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of medication misuse and drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #52) and 1 of 2 staff (CNA A) reviewed for incontinent care as indicated by: The facility failed to ensure CNA A washed or sanitized her hands after doffing (taking off) dirty gloves and went to clean linen cart parked on the hallway for linen. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for one (Closed Record #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. Unit Manager A failed to transcribe physician orders to administer Atorvastatin Calcium Oral Tablet 40 MG at bedtime for CR #1. These failures placed CR #1 at risk of not receiving full dosage and treatment of medication as ordered. Findings Include: Record review of CR #1's facility face sheet dated 12/1/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 5/10/2023 and re-admission date of 11/8/2023. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 resident CR #1) reviewed for medication errors in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Unit Manager transcribed physician orders to administer Atorvastatin Calcium Oral Tablet 40 MG at bedtime for CR # These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving treatment of medication as ordered to treat medical diagnoses. Record review of the Medication Error Report dated 7/7/2023 read in part .Oral Tablet 40 MG (Atorvastatin Calcium) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to other Hyperlipidemia was d/c'd in error for CR #1;orders to run lab. Lipid panel lab results were returned and within normal ranges. NP notified . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility failed to prevent Resident #2 from being verbally abused by RA O. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, and/or emotional distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for misappropriation. The facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property when RA O and CNA M used Resident #2 and Resident #3's phone chargers and charged their phones. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to continued misappropriation of resident's property.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that is palatable and at an appetizing temperature for 7 of 21 residents reviewed for food and nutrition dietary services (Resident #32, #50, #52, #53, #55, #79, #88), in that: ---(11) residents in a confidential group interview said the food was cold and not palatable when it was served ---residents said food was cold and not palatable when it was served and had no flavor This failure placed residents who ate meals in the dining room and in their rooms at risk of diminished quality of life and weight loss due to decreased food quality and temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control process designed to provide safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for handling of residents clothes and linen in the laundry. Facility failed to ensure residents dirty and soiled clothes/linen were contained in a bag. This failure could place residents who had their clothes or linen laundered by the facility at risk of cross contamination and infection.
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 24, 2025, 5 on May 2, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.33 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.96 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.01 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.08 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 34.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.48 on weekdays and 2.96 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 3.33 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.24 | 3.48 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 100 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.37 | 0.22 | 3.52 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 100 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.31 | 0.22 | 3.45 | 2.94 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.28 | 3.50 | 2.90 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Park Manor of Quail Valley's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (58.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 154 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 182 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 92 eligible stays.
49.1% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hmg Healthcare, a group of 31 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Hmg Park Manor of Quail Valley, L.L.C. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/31/2017 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Culp, Roland | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Dohn, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Joy, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/31/2012 | |
| Lege, Rodney | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/18/2020 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Pico, Ana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Prince, Derek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Reed, Bregina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/17/2024 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Way, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Culp, Roland | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Dohn, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Joy, Susan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/31/2012 | |
| Lege, Rodney | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/18/2020 | |
| Pico, Ana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Prince, Derek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Reed, Bregina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/17/2024 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Stanbridge, Norma | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.