Lawrence Presbyterian Manor
1429 Kasold Dr, Lawrence, KS 66049 · Douglas County · (785) 841-4262
40 certified beds, about 38 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175305 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 18, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since November 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.83 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.17 of those hours.
53.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
February 18, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen, kitchenette, and one of two dining rooms.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care)when providing care for Resident (R) 5 and R6. Staff also failed to cover a cart with the resident's linen when transporting it down the hall.
- F Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize an antibiotic stewardship program that included tracking, monitoring, and attempts to decrease the use of unnecessary antibiotics (a class of medications used to treat infections).
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to resolve recurring issues reported by the Resident Council.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted Resident (R) 25 with grooming and shaving and further failed to ensure R25's clothing was clean, and without dried food stains. Findings Included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), lack of coordination, and need assistance with person care. [...]
- D Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 37 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to measure food portions for two of three residents who received ground meat diets, Resident (R) 33 and R28.
May 8, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed for performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 2's low air loss mattress was set at the appropriate setting for R2's weight, who was prone to pressure-related injury. This placed R2 at increased risk for the development of pressure ulcers and the development of new pressure ulcers.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 27's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask was stored in a sanitary manner to decrease exposure and contamination. This deficient practice placed R27 at an increased risk of developing respiratory infection.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were attempted and documented prior to administration of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat a mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing) medication for Resident (R) 2, who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for hospice. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a communication process was implemented, which included how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider. This deficient practice created a risk for missed or delayed services and impaired care for Resident (R)32.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a signed consent or declination for pneumococcal vaccination Prevnar 20 (PCV20) for Resident (R) 2, R25, and R86. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of acquiring, spreading, and experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 35 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to retain the daily posted nursing staffing data for the 18 months as required.
November 2, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement protective measures for the resident immediately after an allegation of abuse. This deficient practice placed Resident (R) 11 at risk for impaired safety and psychosocial wellbeing.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the skills and knowledge necessary to perform and record an immediate physical assessment of Resident (R) 11 after an allegation of rape. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk for unidentified injury and delayed treatment decisions.
Fire safety inspections
17 fire safety citations on file: 7 on February 18, 2026, 5 on May 8, 2024, 5 on November 2, 2022.
Every fire safety citation17 citations
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.83 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.17 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.62 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 4.32 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.35 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.7% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.92 on weekdays and 5.62 on weekends, 5% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 21.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.09 in April to June 2025 to 5.83 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.83 | 1.17 | 5.92 | 5.62 | 21.1% | 0 of 90 | 38 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.92 | 1.25 | 6.13 | 5.38 | 10.9% | 0 of 92 | 36 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.99 | 1.31 | 6.26 | 5.29 | 15.5% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.09 | 1.41 | 5.36 | 4.43 | 21.2% | 0 of 91 | 38 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.2 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC. CMS links this home to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 3.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Manors Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/30/1989 |
| Patrick, Christie | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/06/2015 | |
| Bonney, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 04/23/2019 | |
| Brennecke, Gary | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Cook, James | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2012 | |
| Goodwin, John | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Harris, Daniel | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| McKell, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2012 | |
| Morrison, Aaron | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Nelson, Eleanor | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2010 | |
| Hind, Sherry | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/1989 | |
| Miller, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/1997 | |
| Owens, Melanie | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/10/2017 | |
| Shogren, Bruce | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/05/1996 | |
| Taylor, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/30/1989 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 8, 2024: "Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community Lawrence, 1.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Lawrence Memorial Hospital SNF Lawrence, 2.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Medicalodges Eudora Eudora, 9.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 56 citations
- Baldwin Healthcare & Rehab Center, LLC Baldwin City, 13.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Tonganoxie Terrace Tonganoxie, 14.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 57 citations
- Hillside Village of De Soto Rehabilitation and Nur De Soto, 16.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Heritage Gardens Health and Rehabilitation Center Oskaloosa, 17.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Brookside Retirement Community Overbrook, 19.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
Common questions
- What is Lawrence Presbyterian Manor's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Lawrence Presbyterian Manor 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Lawrence Presbyterian Manor get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 18, 2026. The Kansas average is 9.5.
- Has Lawrence Presbyterian Manor been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Lawrence Presbyterian Manor accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Lawrence Presbyterian Manor?
- CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America. Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.