Home / Florida / Saint Petersburg
Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
6300 46th Ave N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33709 · Pinellas County · (727) 544-1444
159 certified beds, about 141 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1982
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105072 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 17, 2025, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since July 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,345 in the last three years; the largest was $17,345, and the latest is dated July 17, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.45 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
43.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Gold Fl Trust II, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
July 17, 2025Standard inspection · 14 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions and provide supervision to prevent accidents/injuries to residents related to: 1) failure to prevent a fall with injuries for one resident (#56) out of four residents reviewed for falls; and 2) failure to ensure a safe environment for residents to smoke for two residents (#21, #41) out of two residents who required the use of a wheelchair. Residents were expected to sign a leave of absence (LOA) form and then navigate off facility grounds, unassisted, through the parking lot approximately 350 feet, over a large speed bump, and across large potholes, despite being assessed to require supervision during ambulation or requiring the use of a wheelchair.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean, sanitary manner in one kitchen (Main) of one kitchens observed during survey.
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for five residents (#107, #86, #18, #43 and #102) of seven residents sampled.
- E Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care and prevent a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for one resident (#150) out of three residents sampled. Findings Included: During a phone interview on 07/15/2025 at 5:15 p.m., Resident #150 Family Member (FM) stated Resident #150 has been in and out of the hospital related to UTI's, multiple times. When she picks up Resident #150's laundry it is soaking wet. Maybe if they changed her more often, she would not have so many UTI's. When she goes to the hospital and they do lab work it shows E. coli [Escherichia coli] in her urine. Review of Resident #150's admission record revealed an admission date of 06/01/2022. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by 1) failure of staff to provide appropriate incontinence care by two staff members (Staff A, Staff B); 2) failure to implement policies related to staff use of artificial fingernails and containment of long hair for two staff members (Staff K, Staff S); and 3) failure to ensure staff donned Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a contact isolation room for two staff members (Staff AA, Staff AB) out of six staff members observed.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for self-administration of enteral nutrition was completed for one resident (#125) out of one resident reviewed.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of serious injury of unknown source and neglect for one resident (#56) of two residents sampled.
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident and the resident's representative of a hospital transfer in writing prior to the transfer for one resident (#149) out of four residents reviewed.
- D Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority/state intellectual disability authority after a significant change in the mental or physical condition of a resident who has mental illness for one resident (#3) of nine residents reviewed.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement patient-centered interventions related to adaptive dining equipment to promote independence while eating per occupational therapy and physician order for one resident (#13) out of one resident reviewed.
- D Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the medical physician failed to provide the facility with written, signed and dated progress notes following each visit for one (#13) of 34 sampled residents.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders and failed to document physician notification for missed medications for one resident (#110) of one dialysis residents reviewed.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-six medication administration opportunities were observed and two errors were identified for one (#23) of eight residents observed. These errors constituted a 7.69% medication error rate.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure food allergies were accommodated for one resident (#23) of one resident sampled for food allergies.
March 5, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure an effective infection prevention program was implemented for four out of four residents reviewed for on-going skin rashes.
August 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to facilitate timely care plan meeting notifications to allow the representative or resident to participate in the care plan meetings, and failed to provide care plan summaries of the meetings to the representatives and/or three residents (#6, #17, and #23) of three sampled residents.
March 22, 2023Standard inspection · 9 citations
- D Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to include the resident representative in all aspects of the person-centered care planning and the right to participate in the care and treatment planning and process for one (Resident #72) out of fifty-one sampled residents.
- D Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide one (Resident #134) of 51 residents with a written notification for a room change.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #19) of fifty-one sampled residents was assessed upon admission related to activities.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for three (Residents #90, #47 and #38) of four residents sampled for PASARR Level II
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for three (Residents #19, #98, and #114) of fifty-one sampled residents.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #19) of fifty-one sampled residents, was offered and provided assistance to activities of her choice during two of four days observed (3/19/2023, and 3/20/2023).
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors and side effects for psychotropic medications for one (Resident #9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility also failed to limit as needed antianxiety medication for one (Resident #9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents #98 and #114) of fifty-one sampled residents were provide with food items of choice and preference; and failed to ensure Resident #114 received a meal tray which did not include items she was allergic to, during two of four days observed on 3/19/2023, and 3/21/2023. Findings Included: On 3/19/2023 at 12:10 p.m. Resident #98 was observed seated in the main dining room and eating her meal. She waved over this writer as she wanted to talk about what she was served. Her meal tray/plate was observed with what appeared to be two slices of thick turkey, brown gravy on the turkey, mashed potatoes with what appeared to be brown gravy on it, and bread stuffing with what appeared to be a brown gravy all over it. The brown gravy was on all three main food items. Photographic evidence was taken. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an ongoing infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one month (March) of three months reviewed. The facility also failed to maintain an ongoing surveillance program to prevent reoccurring urinary tract infections for one (Resident #80) of 51 sampled residents.
July 30, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to implement an infection control and prevention program to prevent possible transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) as evidenced by their failure to ensure that facility staff members, seven of which were observed, were screened for signs and symptoms each day before working and failed to supervise the screening of three visitors prior to entry to the facility with the potential to expose a total of 146 residents for two of two days observed.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to develop care plan problem areas with goals and interventions for one resident (#192), related to use of antibiotics for infections and failed to implement care plan interventions for one resident (#94), related to not using fall floor mats when the resident was in bed of 51 sampled residents.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, examine, and assess a change of condition in accordance with the professional standards of practice for one resident (#84) related to discolorations and bruises on the resident's left upper arm out of 51 sampled residents.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain drugs and biologicals used in the facility in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in one medication room (200 Wing) of four medication rooms, and failed to properly dispose of a medication patch for one resident (#50) of 35 residents on a pain management program.
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on August 12, 2024, 4 on July 30, 2021.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 17, 2025 | Fine | $17,345 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.45 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.00 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.8% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.1% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.92 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.55 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 3.45 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.45 | 0.38 | 3.55 | 3.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 141 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.36 | 3.57 | 3.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 147 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.62 | 0.43 | 3.75 | 3.29 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 145 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.59 | 0.40 | 3.73 | 3.23 | 0.8% | 0 of 91 | 152 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.0 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.7 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: LEXINGTON HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Gold Fl Trust II, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lexington SNF Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/23/2022 |
| Fl Master Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/27/2022 |
| Davis, Katrina | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Shelby, Jack | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/27/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2025: "Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2025: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.23 hours per resident per day, below the Florida average of 3.49.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Balanced Healthcare Saint Petersburg, 0.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Alhambra Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Saint Petersburg, 1.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Eagle Lake Nursing and Rehab Care Center Saint Petersburg, 2.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Gulf Shore Care Center Pinellas Park, 2.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Marion and Bernard L Samson Nursing Center Saint Petersburg, 2.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Pinellas Park Fl Opco, LLC Pinellas Park, 2.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Vivo Healthcare Laurellwood Saint Petersburg, 3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Vivo Healthcare Gateway Pinellas Park, 3.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 26 citations
Florida contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, Long Term Care Services Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Florida Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-888-831-0404. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: FloridaHealthFinder, where Florida publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 14 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 17, 2025. The Florida average is 7.1.
- Has Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,345 in the last three years.
- Does Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to Gold Fl Trust II. Legal business name: LEXINGTON HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.