Home / Florida / Saint Petersburg
1100 66th St. N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33710 · Pinellas County · (727) 345-9331
59 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105292 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 29, 2024, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 45 health citations since March 2021, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $312,600 in the last three years; the largest was $159,713, and the latest is dated August 29, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
CMS links it to Blue Ridge Healthcare, an affiliated group of 3 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 45 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteCross Reference F623 and F626 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document in the medical record the reasons why they could not meet the needs and readmit one (#1) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights.
Inspectors wroteCross Reference F622 and F623 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit readmission from the hospital for one (#1) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights.
Inspectors wroteCross Reference F622 and F626 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer and discharge notice to the resident representative, and a copy to the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for one (#1) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to prevent multiple significant medication errors for 1 resident (#347) out of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #347 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for intravenous antibiotic administration due to intracranial abscesses and with diagnosis of opioid abuse with withdrawals. She was transferred to the facility with orders to treat the opioid abuse with withdrawals with buprenorphine and naloxone 8-2 mg (Suboxone) sublingually three times a day. The facility failed to provide Resident #347's her Suboxone medication for two and a half days. Resident #347 arrived at the facility with hospital orders to take buprenorphine and naloxone (Suboxone) 8-2mg sublingually film three times a day. The medication was ordered as buprenorphine 2mg sublingually twice day. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee developed and implemented action plans to correct deficient practices identified during an intervening complaint survey conducted on 9/18/24 and the recertification survey originally conducted on 8/26/24 to 8/29/24 as evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1. Maintain an infection prevention and surveillance program for 6 out of 6 months reviewed. 2. The facility also failed to ensure their infection control guidelines policy was reviewed yearly and was revised with current evidence-based practices. 3. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during lunch meal service for one out of three meal observations. 4. The facility also failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place for two residents with intravenous lines (#347 and #31) out of two residents sampled for intravenous lines.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to have a qualified infection Preventionist who was qualified by education, training, experience or certification for one of one staff member acting as the infection Preventionist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary homelike environment for two out of two units in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnoses were accurate for nine residents (#25, #27, #24, #26, #7, #4, #35, #28, #39) out of 20 residents sampled. 1. Review of Resident #4's admission Record showed Resident #4 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 06/18/2024 after returning to the facility from a hospitalization. Resident #4's admission Record showed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Psychoactive Substance Dependence and Alcohol Dependence. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed in a timely manner for two (#20 and #33) residents out of 20 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents (#10, #9) of 20 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to develop and/or implement an effective care plan for two (#35 and #24) residents out of 20 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (#7) out of one sampled residents received assistance to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review 1. The facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders for one resident (#7) out of 2 sampled residents, and 2. the facility failed to ensure flammable products (petroleum jelly) were not used during oxygen use for one resident (#25) out of 2 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed, and twelve errors were identified for two residents (#35, #25) out of three residents observed. These errors constituted a 48.00% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure bed rails were secure for 1 resident (#9) of 5 sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were functioning properly in resident rooms and bathrooms for one resident (# 24) out of six residents sampled
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent flying insects in resident rooms and resident common areas for four of four days.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess with an Interdisciplinary Team approach, obtain physician orders and develop a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for two of two sampled residents (#50 and #51) related to administering their own medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure and safe manner for one resident (Resident #2) of one resident allowed to self-administer medications, and leaving medication unattended on one (North) of two medication carts .
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a safe and effective discharge planning process for three (#8, #3, and #1) of five residents sampled for discharge. Resident #8, a dialysis dependent resident, was discharged to his condemned mobile home with no arrangements for dialysis or home health services. Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment and was discharged in a taxi cab to live with a family member who was not present or prepared to care for the resident in the home. Resident #3 had no way to access the home upon his arrival and the taxi cab driver contacted law enforcement for assistance. Resident #1, who was dependent on oxygen, was discharged home without medical equipment to maintain her respiratory status. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to advocate and provide medically related social services to ensure three (#8, #3, and #1) of five residents sampled for discharge had the community supports, services, and equipment to ensure a safe discharge to a safe and habitable location. Resident #8, a dialysis dependent resident, was discharged to his condemned mobile home with no arrangements for the continuation of life-saving dialysis treatment, home health services, or community support to ensure food availability and food preparation for special dietary needs. Resident #3, who suffered from severe cognitive impairment, was placed in a taxi cab by himself and sent home to live with family who was not present or prepared to care for the resident. Resident #3 had an invalid order for home health services and no way to access the home upon his arrival. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to monitor one diabetic resident (#5) out of three residents sampled for blood glucose levels as ordered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management for one resident (#6) of three residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on a interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was available for 8 consecutive hours every day, seven days a week, for a two-week period from 10/01/23 to 10/14/23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to 1) establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled substances in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; and 2) determine that drug records are in order and an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for two residents (#4 and #6) of three residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the medical record had complete and accurate documentation related to meals and wounds for two residents (#2 and #5) out of nine residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure implementation of an effective performance improvement action plan ongoing for 15 months related to care plans. Failures included not ensuring consistent audit process and not analyzing and tracking data from audits that were conducted to implement correction. This resulted in five residents (#144, #147, #39, #145, and #146) out of five residents sampled not having comprehensive care plans developed by the interdisciplinary team and within required timeframes.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure code status (type of emergent treatment a person would or would not want to receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) was identified and confirmed upon admission for two residents (#146, #144) out of four sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans with the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care according to professional standards of quality care were developed for two newly admitted residents (#147 and #144) out of four sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, facility policy and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident centered care plan was developed and implemented related to behavior monitoring for use of a psychotropic medication for one (Resident #39) of five residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed by the interdisciplinary team within required timeframes for two newly admitted residents (#145, #146) out of four residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors related to a psychotropic drug regime for one resident (#39) of five sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record reviews, the facility did not ensure that 1) medications were available for 2 residents, (Resident #3 and Resident #17), and 2) did not ensure eye drops orders were clarified for 1 resident, (Resident # 2) of 21 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-seven medication administration opportunities were observed, and twenty-four errors were identified for four (#16, #7, #19, and #13) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 64.86% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to designate a healthcare professional with specialized training as the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) for the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one (#20) of 21 sampled residents was provided with linens to cover a mattress.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, policies and resident council minutes review, the facility failed to act upon resident's concerns and grievances as evidenced by: (1) same grievances reported and documented without resolution for 6 out of 6 resident council meeting minutes. (2) Facility not having social services personnel available. (3) Nursing home administrator (NHA) failure to attend resident council meetings per the request of council participants. (4) NHA failure to respond to grievances and complaints.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it developed skin assessments for two residents (#5, and #45) of 21 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one (#99) of 21 residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident and resident representative were involved in care planning for one (Resident #3) of nine residents reviewed for care planning.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure three (#3, #14, #20) of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) received assistance with showers and nail care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and records review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activities program to support the comprehensive assessment and care planned choices and preferences for one (#3) of three residents sampled for activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain the reach in freezer at appropriate temperatures and ensure staff kept personal items separate from food storage on 2 of 2 days observed (3/15 and 3/17/21).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure one (#18) of 21 sampled residents had an accurately documented code status in the medical record.
19 fire safety citations on file: 8 on August 29, 2024, 2 on September 8, 2022, 9 on March 18, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 29, 2024 | Fine | $152,887 |
| November 2, 2023 | Fine | $159,713 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.29 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.04 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.56 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.18 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.64 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.39 on weekdays and 4.04 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.73 in April to June 2025 to 4.29 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.29 | 0.55 | 4.39 | 4.04 | 0.2% | 1 of 90 | 36 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.24 | 0.35 | 4.30 | 4.08 | 15.2% | 2 of 92 | 39 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.73 | 0.37 | 3.80 | 3.56 | 33.1% | 1 of 91 | 37 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.5 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 38.8 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.0 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Eagle Lake Nursing and Rehab Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
32.1% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: EAGLE LAKE NURSING & REHAB OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Blue Ridge Healthcare, a group of 3 nursing homes averaging 1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Lake Nursing and Rehab Holding LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2024 |
| Najman, Eden | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Najman, Paz | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Najman, Eden | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Bush, Sherry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Bush, Sherry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Saba, Fadi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Florida inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.