Home / South Carolina / Anderson
Linley Park Post Acute
208 James Street, Anderson, SC 29625 · Anderson County · (864) 226-3427
88 certified beds, about 84 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425016 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 16, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 12 health citations since September 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.31 of those hours.
63.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.
December 16, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)21's Medical Director was notified of R21 chewing gum, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)21's, with a physician-ordered NPO (nothing by mouth) status and documented aspiration risk, held a Care Plan meeting to discuss R21's chewing gum and implemented measures to protect R21 from choking as a result of the chewing gum.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)21, with a physician-ordered NPO (nothing by mouth) status and documented aspiration risk, was protected from avoidable accident hazards, specifically choking. Review of the facility policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting, revised July 2017, revealed All accidents or hazards involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator. Review of R21's Face Sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a means to call for staff when the call bell system was not functional in the hallway of rooms 20 - 34 for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed.
July 16, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policies observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)125 was free of significant medication errors when he received a blood pressure medication outside the ordered parameter. R125 received the blood pressure medication multiple times in error for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility further failed to ensure insulin via a flex pen was administered correctly by nurses for 3 out of 3 residents observed during medication administration. Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications. states, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 8. [...]
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician and the responsible party for Resident (R)68 were notified related to refusal of insulin on multiple occasions for 1 of 1 reviewed for notification. Review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, states: Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g.,changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). The, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, states: 1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): c. Adverse reaction to medication; d. Significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; e. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on the guidance for administering insulin via an Insulin Pen, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent for 4 out 25 opportunities for error. The medication administration error rate was 16 percent. Review of the guidance titled, Insulin Administration Using an Insulin Pen, states: How to Use. 7. Wipe the tip of the pen where the needle will attach with an alcohol swab or a cotton ball moistened with alcohol. 8. Remove the protective pull tab from the needle and screw it onto the pen until snug (but not too tight). 9. Remove both the plastic outer cap and inner needle cap. 10. Look at the dose window and turn the dosage knob to 2 units. 11. Holding the pen with the needle pointing upwards, press the button until at least a drop of insulin appears. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility policy, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure outdated medications and biologicals were removed from storage with other medications and biologicals in use for residents in 3 of 4 medication carts and 2 of 2 treatment carts. Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, states, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation, states: 4. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.
September 9, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 (Resident (R)42, R33, and R43) of 24 residents who resided on A Unit. Observations revealed the residents' rooms had areas of disrepair.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of Coronavirus (COVID-19) as well as other communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure unvaccinated/or partially vaccinated newly admitted residents were quarantined to their rooms for two (Resident (R)223 and R230) of 5 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. 2. Ensure that during medication administration observations nursing staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when they went in rooms with residents who were on quarantine for one of three units, Unit B. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. Observations of medication administration at the facility on 09/07/22 and 09/08/22 with two nurses on two hallways revealed there were 29 opportunities for error with 3 errors leading to a medication error rate of 10.34%.
- D Provide a bathroom in or located near each resident’s room.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident room was near a toilet and bathing facilities for 1 of 3 hallways on the A Unit. Interview with Resident (R)66, who lived on the A Unit, revealed they did not have access to a sink or toilet on their hallway, and observations and interviews with staff revealed the plumbing on the hallway was broken, leaving residents without near access to bathing or toilet facilities.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 4 on December 16, 2025.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- E Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.23 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.31 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.81 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.14 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.4% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 71.4% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.39 on weekdays and 2.81 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.23 | 0.31 | 3.39 | 2.81 | 8.4% | 0 of 90 | 84 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.27 | 0.47 | 3.46 | 2.81 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.57 | 0.46 | 3.81 | 2.95 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.50 | 3.87 | 3.04 | 2.7% | 0 of 91 | 81 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.2 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.8 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: ANDERSON COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmetto Community Healthcare, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/29/2021 |
| Budhoo, David | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| McCowan, Kevin | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/15/2022 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2024: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 16, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 16, 2025: "Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 16, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.81 hours per resident per day, below the South Carolina average of 3.33.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- NHC Healthcare - Anderson Anderson, 1.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Achieve Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Anderson, 2.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Richard M Campbell Veterans Nursing Home Anderson, 5.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Iva Post-Acute Iva, 15 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Piedmont Post-Acute Piedmont, 16.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Hart Care Center Hartwell, 19 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 1 citation
- Seneca Health & Rehabilitation Center Seneca, 19.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Powdersville Post-Acute Easley, 20 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 11 citations
South Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: South Carolina Department of Public Health, Healthcare Quality, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: South Carolina Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department on Aging, 1-800-868-9095. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: SC Survey and Certification Public CMS-2567 Search, where South Carolina publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Linley Park Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Linley Park Post Acute 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Linley Park Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 16, 2025. The South Carolina average is 3.7.
- Has Linley Park Post Acute been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Linley Park Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Linley Park Post Acute?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: ANDERSON COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.