Find a nursing home

Home / New Jersey / Voorhees

Lions Gate

1100 Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043 · Camden County · (856) 667-3100

110 certified beds, about 97 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315499 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 12, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.61 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.94 of those hours.

34.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
5E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 12, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following:On 6/4/26 at 9:36 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Chief Executive Chef (CEC) prior to the initial tour of the kitchen. The CEC stated that the kitchen was Kosher which included separate kitchens, refrigerators, freezers, and dish machines for meat and dairy. On 6/4/26 at 9:48 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the CEC and the Food Service Director (FSD) toured the kitchen and observed the following:1. On the chef's preparatory table, there was a can opener with a black sticky residue. The CEC stated the can opener should be cleaned daily.2. [...]
  2. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge tracking record in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #77). This deficient practice was evidenced by:ReferenceA MDS is a comprehensive tool that is a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of the assessment being completed. On 6/4/26 at 1:10 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #77's electronic medical record. The record included that the resident was discharged home on 2/15/26, but that there was no discharge tracking record completed for the resident's discharge date . [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 6/04/26 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 lying in bed. The resident's left hand was contracted without a splint device in place. On 6/05/26 at 12:46 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 lying in bed. The resident's left hand was contracted without a splint device in place. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #11. [...]
February 13, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/7/25 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Director of Culinary (DC) prior to the initial tour of the kitchen. The DC stated that items stored in the refrigerators and freezers should be labeled and dated with the received date, the opened dated, and the use-by date. The DC further stated that dishware should be inverted and air dried after washing. On 2/7/25 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the DC, observed the following in the kitchen: In the Meat Refrigerator: 1. A shallow two-inch hotel pan of tilapia which was sealed with plastic wrap. [...]
  2. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and review of pertinent facility records, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan for a resident that was requiring an anti-anxirty and anti-psychotic medication. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for medication regimen. On 2/10/25 at 10:00 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #29 awake, and alert, fully dressed, sitting in a wheelchar in their room. The survyeor reviewed the medical record for Resident #29. [...]
  3. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ179408 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) that the wound treatment cart was locked when not in use b.) accountability for the completion of the narcotic shift-to-shift count logs in accordance with the facility policy b.) an accurate account of the administration and documentation of controlled medications c.) properly dispose of medications at the time of resident refusal and d.) that expired medical supplies were not available for use in resident care in the medication storage room and in the emergency crash cart. [...]
  4. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food served to residents was palatable. This deficient practice was identified for 5 out of 5 residents (Resident # 29, #31, #37, #74 and #75) who attended the Resident Council meeting conducted by the survey team on 2/10/25 and confirmed during the lunchtime meal service on 2/11/25 for 1 of 4 nursing units (Skilled 1) tested for food palatability. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/7/25 at 10:00 AM, during the initial tour of the Skilled 1 nursing unit, Resident #29 stated that the food was the worst and the meat was tough. At 10:13 AM, Resident #37 stated that the food was cold, and the meat was tough and inedible. At 10:34 AM, Resident # 31 stated that the food was inedible, cold, and the meat was tough. [...]
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices to ensure a.) staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during meal service for 1 of 4 dining rooms observed (First floor Skilled Nursing Unit ), b.) an ice scooper was used to obtain ice from the ice machine during dining observation of 1 of 4 dining rooms observed (First floor skilled nursing unit), c.) ensure respiratory equipment was stored in an appropriate way to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for use of respiratory equipment (Resident # 18) and d.) enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) was initiated for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for infection control. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: [...]
  6. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served their meals in a manner that promotes respect and dignity for 2 residents (Resident #32 and #42) observed during a lunch meal service on 1 of 4 units (Skilled 2). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 2/10/25 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal service in the Skilled 2 nursing unit dining room. Resident #32 was seated in a geriatric (geri) chair (a reclining chair) at a table with two other residents. At 12:38 PM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 standing over Resident #32 while feeding the resident tomato soup and sips of his/her beverage. At 12:47 PM, LPN #1 stopped feeding Resident #32 as the resident had finished his/her soup. [...]
  7. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ179408 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of narcotic drug diversion to the New Jersey Department of Health and the Office of the Ombudsman for the Institutionalized Elderly in a timely manner in accordance with state and federal requirements. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 Nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 and 3 of 3 residents (Resident #197, #198, and #199) reviewed for pain medication administration on 1 of 4 nursing units (Rehabilitation Unit #1) and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F755 On 2/11/25 at 8:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #197. [...]
  8. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a re-weight according to the facility's policy for a resident with a history of significant weight loss. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #51) reviewed for nutrition and evidenced by the following: On 2/10/25 at 1:01 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #51 in the first-floor skilled nursing unit dining room being served breakfast. The resident received pancakes cut into bite sized portions. The resident complained that the pancakes were cold and did not eat the pancakes. On 2/11/25 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #51 in the first-floor skilled nursing unit dining room being served breakfast. The resident received pancakes cut into bite sized portions. The resident ate about 50% of their meal. [...]
February 9, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the planned menu and serve foods to residents in the amount indicated on the diet spreadsheet for 2 of 2 meals observed. This had the potential to affect 71 residents who received meals from the kitchen, as identified by the facility.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's dental status for 1 (Resident #161) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dental services. A review of Resident #161's admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications and need for assistance with personal care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #161 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident did not have any tooth fragments or broken natural teeth. A review of Resident #161's Nursing Admission/Readmit Screening/History, dated 01/25/2023, indicated the resident did not have any broken teeth. [...]
  3. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, facility policy review, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was conducted for 1 (Resident #61) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Specifically, the facility failed to refer Resident #61 for a Level II PASRR when the resident was newly diagnosed with a mental illness.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a care planned intervention for daily inspections of a resident's feet was implemented for 1 (Resident #161) of 3 residents reviewed for diabetes management. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #161with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications and need for assistance with personal care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #161 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #161 required supervision with personal hygiene and did not have any ulcers, wounds, or skin problems. [...]
  5. D
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    F687 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and facility document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide foot care and services to prevent potential diabetes complications for 1 (Resident #161) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for diabetes management. A review of Resident #161's admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications and need for assistance with personal care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #161 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had no ulcers, wounds, or skin problems. [...]

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 12, 2026, 3 on February 13, 2025, 2 on February 9, 2023.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · June 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · June 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · June 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · February 13, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · February 13, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · February 13, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · February 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · February 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNew JerseyUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.613.853.86
Registered nurses0.940.680.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.293.503.42
Nurse aides2.95
Licensed practical nurses1.72
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)34.5%39.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover15.0%37.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.99 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.73 on weekdays and 5.29 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.64 in April to June 2025 to 5.61 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.610.945.735.29 8.0%0 of 9097
Oct to Dec 20255.721.035.895.28 6.9%0 of 9298
Jul to Sep 20255.680.935.815.34 5.1%0 of 9299
Apr to Jun 20255.640.925.815.19 7.5%0 of 9199
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
New Jersey, Jan to Mar 20263.680.593.823.3411.6%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for New Jersey

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
New Jersey, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.52$21.13 to $23.4432,400
LPNs and LVNs$36.13$32.16 to $38.4517,410
Registered nurses$51.20$47.94 to $61.4192,680
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Lions Gate. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNew JerseyUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.78.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.52.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.31.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.78.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.05.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.412.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.524.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.28.112.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.42.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.61.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lions Gate's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (57.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

57.6% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 704 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

14.3% this home

Worse than the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 709 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

4.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 403 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

38.7% this home

Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 333 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.7% this home

Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 412 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.3% this home

Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 412 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 84 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SJF CCRC, INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Okoli Umeweni, AdaoraContracted managing employeeIndividual06/30/2007
Becker, MeredithW-2 managing employeeIndividual02/11/2022
Palella, CristinaW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/31/2022
Thompson, DavidW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/14/2021
Thompson, DavidCorporate directorIndividual11/05/2019
Okoli Umeweni, AdaoraAdp of the SNFIndividual01/10/2025
Palella, CristinaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/10/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2026: "Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2025: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on February 13, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."

Other nursing homes nearby

New Jersey contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Lions Gate's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Lions Gate 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Lions Gate get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 12, 2026. The New Jersey average is 8.6.
Has Lions Gate been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Lions Gate accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Lions Gate?
CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: SJF CCRC, INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection