Find a nursing home

Home / Connecticut / Plantsville

Livewell Connecticut

1261 South Main Street, Plantsville, CT 06479 · Capitol County · (860) 628-9000

120 certified beds, about 75 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075378 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 28, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 9 health citations since March 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.78 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.96 of those hours.

30.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
4D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
April 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the staff provided care in accordance with the plan of care and failed to ensure staff to reapproached the resident when resisted care.
March 28, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to provide documentation that their flushing program logs were maintained according to the facility's water management plan.
  2. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation and interviews for four sampled residents (Residents #22, #26, #30 and #49) who received psychiatric medications and received psychiatric services, the facility failed to ensure psychiatric visits were documented in a timely manner.
  3. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedure and interviews for three of five sampled residents (Resident #46, Resident #47, and Resident #50), reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the pneumococcal vaccine was offered and administered as required.
March 30, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and interview for 1 sampled resident (Resident #40) with an indwelling catheter, the facility failed to ensure a privacy cover was utilized to conceal a urinary containment bag.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents, (Resident #35) reviewed for positioning, the facility failed to ensure a resident was repositioned in a timely fashion.
  3. B
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review for 1 sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for Hospice, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded accurately related to Hospice status. Resident #58's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition and anemia. Physician orders dated 11/18/22 directed a Hospice consultation. Hospice notes dated 11/29/22 through 3/21/23 identified Resident #58 was receiving Hospice services. [...]
March 5, 2020Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for two of five sampled residents (Residents #54 and #60) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to monitor for target behaviors or assess the potential side effects related to the use of antipsychotics.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 15, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, interviews, and review of facility policy, for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, (Resident #28), the facility failed to ensure offloading of heels as per physician's orders for a resident at risk of developing a pressure ulcer.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.783.733.86
Registered nurses0.960.690.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.573.373.42
Nurse aides3.31
Licensed practical nurses0.52
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)30.4%37.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover27.8%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.58 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.87 on weekdays and 4.57 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.38 in April to June 2025 to 4.78 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.780.964.874.57 0.0%0 of 9075
Oct to Dec 20254.921.035.064.58 0.0%0 of 9274
Jul to Sep 20254.941.095.084.57 0.0%0 of 9273
Apr to Jun 20255.381.165.525.05 0.0%0 of 9166
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Connecticut, Jan to Mar 20263.660.613.803.316.0%1.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.817.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.10.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.11.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.23.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.816.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.04.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
36.317.815.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.82.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.71.51.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LIVEWELL ALLIANCE INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Hunt, MaleyCorporate directorIndividual09/09/2020
Reese, ElizabethCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2010
Lenkiewicz, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2003
Smith, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual09/09/2020
Thompson Robison, JulieCorporate officerIndividual08/01/2000
Hunt, MaleyOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/09/2020
Smith, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/02/1996

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 30, 2023: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 30, 2023: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."

Other nursing homes nearby

Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Livewell Connecticut's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Livewell Connecticut 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Livewell Connecticut get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 28, 2025. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
Has Livewell Connecticut been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Livewell Connecticut accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Livewell Connecticut?
CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: LIVEWELL ALLIANCE INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection