Find a nursing home

Home / Connecticut / Meriden

Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion

320 Colony Street, Meriden, CT 06451 · Capitol County · (203) 235-5716

30 certified beds, about 29 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075439 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 10, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 18 health citations since July 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated January 5, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.07 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.18 of those hours.

22.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
February 3, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1, #2 and #3) who were reviewed for the use of antipsychotic medication, the facility failed to ensure the resident's targeted behaviors were being monitored.
  2. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record to include an antipsychotic medication was transcribed correctly and signed off as administered.
January 5, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance for ambulation, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during ambulation with a rolling walker, which resulted in a fall with a right femoral neck fracture requiring surgical intervention.
March 10, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on the tour of the Dietary Department, observations, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Department served food at temperatures outside of the danger zone and failed to ensure foods reheated by nursing staff were served at safe temperatures.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to choose.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for elopement, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident at risk of elopement.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for skin conditions and 1 of 1 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), the facility failed to revise resident care plans (RCP) after changes in condition occurred.
  5. D
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    F745 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to identify and promote individualized care for a resident who voiced goals of care requests.
May 11, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of polices and interviews for 6 of 9 residents (Resident #3, #8, #9, #12, #22 and #26) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the residents had identification bands during medication administration and for 3 of 9 residents (Residents #8, #12, #22), the facility failed to follow safe medication administration practices when identifying the right resident through electronic health record picture.
  2. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, review of policy and staff interviews for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #6, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #16, Resident #21, Resident #24, and Resident #26) reviewed for clinical documentation, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record regarding residents' alcohol consumption during recreational activities.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review for 1 sampled resident (Resident #9) reviewed for alcohol use, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was implemented for a resident who consumed alcohol during recreational activities.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview for one resident (Resident # 8) reviewed for at risk for pressure ulcer, the facility failed to accurately assess and stage the resident's pressure ulcer.
  5. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents ( Resident# 5), reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to meal supplement to the resident as directed by the physician and for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for weight loss, the facility failed to follow a recommendation for weekly weights and the facility policy for weight management for a resident at risk for nutritional problems and for (Resident #12) reviewed for weight loss, the facility failed to consistently monitor weekly weights as ordered for a resident identified with significant weight loss.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #11) reviewed for oxygen usage, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order was followed for oxygen setting and Nursing Assistant (NA) provided care within scope of practice.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #17) who was reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to dispose of an expired sanitizing agent.
  8. B
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment.
July 14, 2021Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 19, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff donned hair restraints, date and label opened food items, discard expired food, sanitize the food thermometer before use, maintain clean dish storage and ensure staff performed hand hygiene when necessary,.
  2. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 14, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews for one room containing a laundry chute, the facility failed to ensure the laundry chute room doors self-closed and latched.

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 10, 2025, 2 on May 11, 2023.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · March 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · March 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · March 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
January 5, 2026Fine $8,278

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.073.733.86
Registered nurses1.180.690.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.543.373.42
Nurse aides2.38
Licensed practical nurses0.51
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)22.2%37.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover11.1%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.28 on weekdays and 3.54 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.02 in April to June 2025 to 4.07 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.071.184.283.54 8.2%0 of 9029
Oct to Dec 20253.901.124.113.37 3.5%0 of 9230
Jul to Sep 20253.961.144.143.51 6.6%0 of 9229
Apr to Jun 20254.021.174.173.66 7.0%0 of 9128
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Connecticut, Jan to Mar 20263.660.613.803.316.0%1.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.017.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.43.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.91.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.516.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.24.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.717.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.624.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.010.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.32.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.61.51.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE BRADLEY HOME.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Carabetta, DavidCorporate directorIndividual11/01/2023
Curry, KevinCorporate directorIndividual11/01/2023
Fraser, BarbaraCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2021
Gulino, RosarioCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2021
Haberli, EdwardCorporate directorIndividual11/01/2023
Miller, JohnCorporate directorIndividual04/17/2023
Suzio Munson, LindaCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2021
Thibeault, WendyCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2021
Vumbaco, GeorgeannCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2016
Bogdanski - Bourdan, SarahCorporate officerIndividual11/01/2017
Feest, JosephCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2013
McGoldrick, MatthewCorporate officerIndividual11/01/2021
Sarrazin, MarciaCorporate officerIndividual11/19/2024
Zygmont-Ross, ChristineCorporate officerIndividual11/18/2021
Kane, DianeOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/02/2006
Martell, CliffordOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/1999
Miller, JohnOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/17/2023
Martell, CliffordAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/1999
Miller, JohnAdp of the SNFIndividual04/17/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on February 3, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 5, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 10, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 10, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice."

Other nursing homes nearby

Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 10, 2025. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
Has Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years.
Does Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Bradley Home Infirmary/Pavilion?
CMS lists 19 owners and managers. Legal business name: THE BRADLEY HOME.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection