Find a nursing home

Home / West Virginia / Fairmont

Majestic Care of Manchin

401 Guffey Street, Fairmont, WV 26554 · Marion County · (304) 363-2500

41 certified beds, about 31 residents a day · Government - State · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515075 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 35 health citations since April 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
25D
9E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
April 24, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 13 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for resident Room identifiers: #218, #212, and #205. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Census: 25.
  2. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on Electronic Medical Record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for non-pharmacological interventions and implement a toileting care plan for two (2) residents. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who were reviewed for care plans. Resident identifiers: #14, #4, #20. Facility census: 25.
  3. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #22 was found to have a razor in his bathroom. For residents #25 and #27, Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) revealed the facility failed to to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and elopements. For Resident #27 the facility staff failed to respond to a wander guard alarm. During Resident #5's medication administration, the medication cart was left unlocked. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #22, #25, #27, and #5. Facility Census: 25.
  4. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect multiple residents of the facility. Facility census 25.
  5. E
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 25. Findings Include: a) On 04/22/25 11:20 AM, during the kitchen food temperature testing, observation revealed the burner knobs were not on the stove. The kitchen staff was preparing lunch causing the grilled cheeses to burn. The cook stated the grill was set too high and was unable to adjust the grill temperatures until he replaced the missing knobs with control knobs from the other burners to adjust the grill temperatures. This left the other burners without control knobs. On 04/22/25 at 11:25 AM, In an interview with the facility cook he stated the knobs fell off and were probably under the stove somewhere. [...]
  6. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy and confidentially for Resident #5 during medication administration. Resident identifier: #5. Facility Census: 25.
  7. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was free from restraints. This was true for one (1) of the two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of falls. Resident Identifier: #4. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 2:45 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4 regarding multiple falls. The review found the resident had a physician's order dated 06/21/24 for a self releasing seat belt for improve safety/cues to resident upon standing attempts to help with fall prevention. However, the physician's order did not contain the information to release the restraint every two (2) hours. Upon further review, the care plan under the focus area of at risk for falls related to past history of falls, did list the self releasing seat belt as an intervention. [...]
  8. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the use of restraints. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of falls. Resident identifier: #4. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 2:45 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4 regarding multiple falls. The review found the resident had a physician's order dated 06/21/24 for a self-releasing seat belt for improve safety/cues to resident upon standing attempts to help with fall prevention. However, the physician's order did not contain the information to release the restraint every two (2) hours. Upon further review, the care plan under the focus area of at risk for falls related to history of falls, did list the self-releasing seat belt as an intervention. [...]
  9. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan regarding restraint use for Resident #4 and actual skin breakdown for Resident #12. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #4 and #12. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 2:45 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4 regarding multiple falls. The review found the resident had a physician's order dated 06/21/24 for a self releasing seat belt for improve safety/cues to resident upon standing attempts to help with fall prevention. The care plan does indicate an intervention of the self releasing seat belt under the focus area of risk for falls due to a history of falls; however, the care plan was not revised to indicate the self releasing seat belt is a restraint. [...]
  10. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for toileting schedules for Resident #4 and Resident #20. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #4 and #20. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 9:20 AM, a toileting sheet was observed hanging on Resident #4's bathroom door. The toileting sheet was scheduled for every two (2) hours. The toileting sheet was noted for 04/19/25 through 04/25/25. No documentation was found from 8:00 AM through 10:00 PM. A physician's order dated 01/16/25 stated, Will ask resident if they need to void q2h (every two hours) while awake to help with toileting needs. (Typed as written.) On 04/22/25 at 9:30 AM, an interview with held with Registered Nurse (RN) #22. RN #22 stated, the resident is on a toileting program. [...]
  11. D
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the daily staff posting. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 25. a) Daily Staff Posting On 04/22/25 at 9:00 AM, an observation of the daily staff posting which was hanging at the nurses' station was made. The staff posting dated 04/22/25 did not have the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM shift completed with the census, nursing hours, actual nursing hours worked and staffing totals. On 04/22/25 at 9:12 AM, the Administrator was at nurses' station. The Administrator was notified the posting was not completed. The Administrator confirmed the posting was not complete.
  12. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and complete record for Resident #4's hospice notes and a nursing assessment regarding contractures for Resident #12. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #4 and #12. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 8:45 AM, a review of the hospice notes was completed for Resident #4. During the review, Resident #9's hospice notes were found in Resident #4's medical record. On 04/22/25 at 8:50 AM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the wrong resident's notes were scanned into Resident #4's medical record. The Administrator stated, We will get this taken care of immediately. b) Resident #12 On 04/22/25 at 4:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #12. [...]
  13. C
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) was reviewed annually. This was discovered during the review of the IPCP. This had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census: 25.
November 8, 2023Standard inspection · 12 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards over which it had control. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 32.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    F557 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to respect the Residents right to be treated with respect and dignity. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #27. Facility Census:
  3. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct an accurate initial minimum data set (MDS) assessment. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #32. Facility census: 32.
  4. D
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident 10's Quarterly MDS was submitted during the prescribed timeframe. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 32. Finding Included: a) MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual (October 2019) Chapter 5 Submission and Correction of the MDS Assessments, subsection 5.2 revealed in part the following: Assessment Schedule: An OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) assessment (comprehensive or Quarterly) is due every quarter unless the resident is no longer in the facility. There must be no more than 92 days between OBRA assessments. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This was true for three (3) of 15 sample residents. Resident #1 was coded for a wrong diagnosis, Resident #16's assessment indicated there was a urinary tract infection (UTI) and Resident #32 had an incorrect gradual dose reduction (GDR) date. Resident identifiers: #1, #16, and #32. Facility census: 32.
  6. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans. This was true for two (2) of 15 sample resident's care plans reviewed. Resident #16's care plan was not developed for anticoagulant therapy and Resident #32's was not developed for Hospice services. Resident identifiers: #16 and #32. Facility census: 32.
  7. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan related to skin assessment/breakdown. This was true for one (1) of fifteen (15) care plans reviewed. Resident #12 Facility Census: 32 Findings Included: a) Resident #12 On 11/06/23 at 1:09 PM it was observed that Resident #12 had a small open area to the dorsum of her right foot. It was open to air. On 11/07/23 at 10:06 AM record review shows the Incident/Accident Report dated 11/04/23 at 10:00 AM, describes the injury as small open area to outer/lateral right foot measures 1.2 x 0.8, appears possible pressure from button on brown slipper socks. There was an order dated 11/04/23 which reads: Cleanse area to right outer lateral foot with wound wash, pat dry, apply thin layer of bacitracin and leave open to air twice a day (BID) until healed. [...]
  8. D
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted and readily accessible. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect all residents and visitors wishing to view the information. Facility census: 32.
  9. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving psychotropic medications was monitored for behaviors and side effects of the medications. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 32.
  10. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a locked permanently affixed compartment for storage of controlled drugs and other drugs subject to abuse. This practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 32. Findings Included: a) Medication Storage Room On 11/07/23 at 9:00 AM during the medication storage room observation in the presence of Register Nurse (RN) #45 it was found that the medication refrigerator had no permanently affixed locked box for controlled drugs (narcotic/benzodiazepines) in the medication refrigerator. There was a sealed 30 milliliter (ml) bottle of Lorazepam (a benzodiazepine) 2 milligram (mg)/ml in the refrigerator which was not secured. This was confirmed on 11/07/23 at 9:00 AM by RN #45 and then with the Director of Nursing on 11/07/23 at 9:14 AM. [...]
  11. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered the trash can at the hand washing sink was not operational, and two (2) freezer floors were heavily soiled. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 32.
  12. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure the Physician's Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed. Resident Identifiers: #16 and #15. Facility Census: 32.
April 27, 2022Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. A medication cart was left unlocked during medication pass. Resident identifiers: #13 and #16 Facility census 27.
  2. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five% (5 percent) or greater. There was no order to crush medications, an extended release capsule was opened and administered and bare hands touched a medication. This was discovered for nine (9) of the 28 medications observed during medication pass. Resident identifiers: #21, #16 and #26. Facility census: 27. Findings Included: a) Resident # 21 On 04/26/22 at 8:00 AM Registered Nurse (RN) #12 was observed crushing the following medications for Resident #21: 1. Tramadol 50 milligrams (mgs) 2. Lisinopril 10 mgs 3. Amlodipine 5 mgs 4. Sertraline 50 mgs 5. Diclofenac 50 mgs 6. Metoprolol 25 mgs 7. Feosol 65 mgs On review of Resident #21's medical record, found no order for allowing medications to be crushed. [...]
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the Dishwasher Temperature Log was completed. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to effect more than an unlimited number of Residents. Facility census: 27.
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to self-determination, and reassessment of mental capacity was completed once it was clear the resident's cognition had improved. This was true for one (1) of 27 residents reviewed during the long-term care process. Resident identifier: #18. Facility census: 27.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of medical records, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment services, consistent with professional standards of clinical practice by not administering skin protective devices as ordered by a physician. This was true for one (1) of 27 residents reviewed in the annual long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 27.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to place heel protectors on a Resident to promote the prevention of pressure ulcer development. The failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) Residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: #13. Facility census: 27.
  7. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice. An oxygen humidifier bottle was not changed as ordered. This observation was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 27.
  8. D
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post accurate and detailed nurse staffing information on a daily basis. This was true for eleven (11) out of 26 daily nurse staffing postings reviewed. The postings either were lacking the facility census, or the hours worked. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 27.
  9. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Resident w free of a significant medication error. This was done by allowing an extended release capsule to be opened and administered. This was true for one (1) of 28 medications reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier #16 Facility Census 27 Findings Included: a) Resident #16 Facility drug book named nursing 2022 Drug Handbook found the following: Page 931 .memantine hydrochloride extended-release capsules must be swallowed whole and never crushed, divided or chewed . On 04/26/22 at 8:10 AM this surveyor observed RN #12 open Resident #16 Memantine ER 28 mg capsule and place the contents of the capsule in the with the rest of the morning crushed medications. RN #12 preceded to administer the medications to Resident #16 in the hallway. [...]
  10. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately document nursing services in a Resident's medical record. The failed practice was true for one (1) of 12 sampled Residents. Resident identifier: #3. Facility census: 27.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on November 8, 2023.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · November 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · November 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. C
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · November 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWest VirginiaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.383.673.86
Registered nurses0.740.730.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.503.173.42
Nurse aides2.33
Licensed practical nurses1.31
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported44.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported42.3%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.74 on weekdays and 3.50 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.19 in April to June 2025 to 4.38 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.380.744.743.50 7.4%0 of 9031
Oct to Dec 20252.560.512.742.11 0.0%20 of 9230
Jul to Sep 20254.531.064.883.65 22.0%0 of 9232
Apr to Jun 20255.191.715.574.24 31.0%0 of 9129
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
West Virginia, Jan to Mar 20263.560.673.753.083.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWest VirginiaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.714.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.94.43.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.31.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.215.914.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.64.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.613.415.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.01.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.81.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ownership data not available

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 8, 2023: "Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

West Virginia contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Majestic Care of Manchin's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Majestic Care of Manchin 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Majestic Care of Manchin get at its last inspection?
13 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 24, 2025. The West Virginia average is 11.7.
Has Majestic Care of Manchin been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Majestic Care of Manchin accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Majestic Care of Manchin?
CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection