Home / West Virginia / Fairmont
1539 Country Club Road, Fairmont, WV 26554 · Marion County · (304) 366-9100
119 certified beds, about 107 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515053 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2026, inspectors cited 16 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 61 health citations since March 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated January 30, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.06 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.51 of those hours.
41.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Genesis Healthcare, an affiliated group of 184 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 61 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they had maintained a safe and functional envrionment for residents who wanted to go outside to the patio area. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 101.a) During an interview on 07/22/26 at approximately 9:25 AM the Maintenance director stated that the door to the patio was a sometimes issue. This meant the door sometimes worked and sometimes did not. He continued to state that he would have to contact the vendor to come and fix it. During an interview on 07/22/26 at 9:37 AM the Administrator stated that the door to the patio was not working correctly during their previous annual survey in February 2026. She stated that they had it fixed at that time after receiving a federal tag. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a clean comfortable, homelike environment. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #5, #8, #50. Facility Census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with current standards of practice. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #80, #30 and #11. Facility Census: 106. b) Resident #30: During a dining room observation on 02/10/26 at At 12:10 PM, Employee #17 retrieved Resident number 30's tray, assisted him in set up, handed him his sandwich, then went back to get another resident's tray. Resident # 30 was left food unsupervised for 8 minutes. A further review of Resident's tray ticket read as follows: resident (Name) 1:1 feed assist and ordered supervision for all meals. Record Reviews: A record review on 02/11/26 at 1:30 pm, found the physician dietary order for Resident #30 that read as follows: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store and administer medications according to professional standards of practice. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #40 and #63. Facility Census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards. This is true for the facility kitchen and nourishment pantry. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. This had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents in the facility. Facility census: 106. a) On 2/10/26, at 3:45 PM during an observation of the dumpsters, it was observed that debris and trash were scattered around and behind both dumpsters. [NAME] plastic gloves, plastic cup lids, Styrofoam cups, plastic bags were in the front and sides of both right and left dumpsters. An opened box with take-out food in was observed left opened and a clear bag of trash laying on the ground on the left side of the left dumpster. In an interview with the Director-Senior Maintenance Employee (DSME) #7, he stated he had seen the trash and debris scattered around the dumpster and would get it taken care of.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure it had a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee to meet at least quarterly with the required minimum staff. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 106. Findings Include: a) QAA meetings A review on 02/11/26 at 9:49 PM, of the QAA sign in sheets from 01/25 to 01/26 revealed, that The Director of Nursing (DON) did not attend the 2nd quarter or 3rd quarter meetings as required. During an interview on 02/12/26 at 8:40 AM, The Administrator stated, We had the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), filling in as our Director of Nursing (DON) for the facility because we were in between DON's. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program. was maintained. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #33, #106, #90, #96, #57, #65, #51 and #78. Facility Census: 106. On 02/09/26 at 2:24 PM, it was observed Activities Assistant #49 enter Resident #78's room with droplet precautions sign on door and a red stop sign draped across the front of the door. Activities Assistant walked into room and handed her a package without wearing Personal Protective Equipment PPE. During this time, other staff was in the room wearing PPE. On 02/09/26 at 2:30 PM, during an interview with Activities Assistant #49 when asked if Resident #78 was under precautions, she reported, She doesn't have anything. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure education was offered for all staff for Covid-19 vaccines. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on electronic medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete section N of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of 34 residents. Resident identifier: #16. Facility census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to include all appropriate diagnosis on the most recent Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). This failed practice was found true for (2) two of (5) five residents reviewed for PASARR accuracy during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #5, and #10. Facility Census: 106. a) Resident #10 A record review on 02/10/26 revealed that Resident #10 has a current diagnosis of Schizophrenia with a start date of 10/30/25. Further record review of Resident #10's most recent PASSAR completed on 05/02/22, revealed that Schizophrenia is not indicated on section 30, or listed in any other section of the PASSAR. During an interview on 02/10/26 at 2:12 PM, The Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #59, confirmed that Resident #10 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia and that it is not indicated on the most recent PASSAR. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans related to physician dietary orders and Auditory needs. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #30, and #104. Facility census: 106. Findings Included:a) Resident # 30 On 02/10/2026, at12:06 PM, During Dining Room tray pass, It was observed that Resident #30's meal ticket stated, 1:1 Feed Assist and Supervision for all meals. Employee #17 retrieved Resident #30's tray, assisted in set up, then went back to get another resident's tray leaving Resident # 30 unsupervised for 8 minutes. Record Reviews:On 02/10/2026 at 1:15PM, a completed record review of Resident #30's Physician Orders coincided with the meal ticket stating resident was a 1:1 feed assist and ordered supervision for all meals. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised in the areas of discontinued physician orders and for resident advance directive status. Resident identifiers: #4 and #11. Facility Census:106 a)Resident #4 A record review on 02/11/26 at 10:00 AM, of Resident #4's Care Plan stated : Focus: Name is receiving antibiotic treatment for a Urinary Tract Infection. Interventions: Administer medication(s) as ordered. date initiated 01/21/26 A Further record review of Resident #4's Physician Orders, an order for the antibiotic could not be found. During an interview on 02/11/26 at 2:55 PM, The Director of Nursing (DON) She provided the discontinued Physician Order written below: Physician Orders were as follows: Fosfomycin Tromethamine Oral Packet 3GM Give 1 packet by mouth one time only for UTI for 1 day. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Resident Identifier: #80. Facility Census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on electronic medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of four (4) resident's Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was current and accurate. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #16, #67. Facility census: 106. a) Resident # 67 On 02/10/26 at approximately 2:55PM, a record review found that Resident # 67 was diagnosed with vascular dementia, moderate, with anxiety was not updated in the PASARR. In an interview with the DON on 02/10/26 at 3:25 PM, she acknowledged Resident # 67's PASARR was not updated r/t (related to) the diagnosis of vascular dementia, moderate, with anxiety. She stated she was aware that PASARRs facility wide were in need of updating and an audit was started to rectify the issue. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within the resident's reach for two (2) residents. Resident Identifiers: #40 and #50. Facility Census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide accurate daily staffing posting for actual hours worked. This was found to be true for 14 (fourteen) of 15 (fifteen) days of staffing data reviewed during the annual survey process. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the facility is free of pests and rodents. This was a random opportunity for discovery with the possibility of affecting multiple residents. Facility census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's rooms were a clean and homelike environment (residents' privacy curtains were stained). This is true for Resident #94 and Resident #133.
Inspectors wrotec) Resident #85 A review of Resident #85's medical record found the following transfers to the hospital 08/09/24, 08/31/24, 09/06/24,and 10/22/24. Resident #85 went on therapeutic leave of absence on 11/27/24. On the afternoon of 05/06/25 the facility was asked to provide the notice of the transfer, the bed hold agreement, and the ombudsman notification for each of the aforementioned discharges. Later in the afternoon on 05/06/25 the Person In Charge provided two incomplete Bed Hold Notices dated 08/31/24 and 09/06/24. The only information completed on the form was the residents name and medical record number along with the nursing signature. On the form date 08/31/24 the nurse signed both the resident and the center representative space. On the form dated 09/06/24 the nurse signed the center representative space and documented a verbal notification of the resident representative. [...]
Inspectors wroteb) Resident #20 A review of the Resident #20's medical record on the after noon of 04/30/25 found Resident #20 sustained a fall on 03/12/25 at 5:30 PM. The incident report indicated neurological assessments were done per policy. The facility was asked to provide the completed neurological assessments related to this fall. On 05/01/25 at 9:08 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated they could not locate the neurological assessments for this fall. Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to discontinue wound treatment for Resident #21, when the wound was healed and failed to complete neurological (neuro) checks for Resident #20. This was true for two (2) of 42 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #21 and #20. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #21 On 05/06/25 at 2:55 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #21. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation record review staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #21, and Resident #22 received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices, related to pain management. This was true for two (2) of 10 residents reviewed for the care area of pain during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #21, and #22. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #21 On 04/29/25 at 1:36 PM Resident #21 stated, she had been asking them for pain medication, and they had not given her any yet. The resident was asked to rate her pain on a scale from zero (0) to ten (10) with zero (0) being no pain and ten (10) being the worst pain ever. Resident #21 stated that her pain was an eight (8). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident Meals were served, which were palatable and at an appetizing temperature. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of Residents. Facility Census: 106 a) Resident #6 During an interview with Resident #6 on 04/29/25 at 10:27 AM, Resident stated food was terrible here. When I asked her if it was not the proper temperature, did not taste b) Resident #11 On 04/29/25 at 1:43 PM during an interview, Resident #11 reported the food has no taste, sometimes it is too cool, and she was concerned about the nutritional status. She went on to report on the facility does not serve fresh fruits or veggies and the food has no seasoning and is not appealing. c) Resident #35 On 04/29/25 at 1:38 PM during an interview, Resident #35 reported the food does not taste good. [...]
Inspectors wrotee) Reheated food during the noon time meal service o 05/05/25. An observation of the noon time meal on 05/05/25 at 12:35 PM, found [NAME] #124 reheated broccoli which was previously held for service but fell below the acceptable temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F). She reheated the broccoli to a degree of 160 degrees f. Dietary Account Manager #96 told her 160 degrees F was an acceptable temperature and it was okay to serve the broccoli. [NAME] #124 then served the reheated broccoli. An interview with the corporate account manager at 2:04 PM on 05/05/25 confirmed the broccoli should have been reheated to 165 degrees F. He stated, They told me that but there was not much to do about it after the fact. [...]
Inspectors wroteb) Resident #102 An observation on the afternoon of 05/05/25 found Resident #102's10:00 AM mighty shake still sitting at the nurses' station unopened. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found Registered Nurse (RN) #10 had documented Resident #102 had consumed 100 percent of his 10:00 am mighty shake. An interview with RN #10 immediately following the record review found she should have documented refused on the mighty shake. c) Resident #78 An observation on the afternoon of 05/05/25 found Resident #78's 10:00 am mighty shake still sitting at the nurses' station unopened. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found Registered Nurse (RN) #10 had documented Resident #78 had consumed 100 percent of his 10:00 am mighty shake. An interview with RN #10 immediately following the record review found she should have documented refused on the mighty shake. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control standards during wound care for Resident #61, storage of a nebulizer and mask for Resident #60 and maintaining a wheelchair for Resident #19. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #61, #60 and #19. Facility Census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food choices were obtained and honored. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed during the annual survey process. Resident identifier: #309. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy by ensuring allegations of mental/emotional abuse were reported to the required state agencies within the required time frames. This was a random opportunity for discovery for Resident #93. Resident identifier: #93. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #93 On 05/01/25 at approximately 1:20 PM while passing through the dining room this surveyor overheard a nurse (later Identified at LPN #133) say to Resident #93, You can't have your pain medicine until you eat at least half of your food. The nurse then left the dining room. This was reported to facility staff immediately after the observation. Facility staff intervened and had the nurse give Resident #93 her Tylenol. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all allegations of mental abuse were reported to the required state agencies with in the required time frames. This was a random opportunity for discovery and as true for Resident #93. Resident Identifier: #93. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #93 On 05/01/25 at approximately 1:20 PM while passing through the dining room this surveyor overheard a nurse (later Identified at LPN #133) say to Resident #93, You can't have your pain medicine until you eat at least half of your food. The nurse then left the dining room. This was reported to facility staff immediately after the observation. Facility staff intervened and had the nurse give Resident #93 her Tylenol. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement the care plans for three (3) of 42 sample residents. Resident identifiers: #48, #9, and #309. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #48 An interview with Resident #48 on 04/2925 at 12:46 PM found she was a hemodialysis patient. She stated, They use the port in my groin for now, but I have one in my upper arm that needs to mature. A review of Resident #48's medical record found she returned from the hospital on [DATE] after the placement of an Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) in her left upper arm. A review of Resident #48's care plan found it was void or any mention of the residents AVF in her left upper arm. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on the afternoon 05/06/25 confirmed a care plan was not developed for Resident #48's AVF. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for a change in code status for Resident #99. This is true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of advanced directives. Resident Identifier: #99. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #99 On 05/05/25 at 2:15 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #99. The review noted the [NAME] Virginia Physician's Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form was Do Not Resuscitate, Comfort Measures and no artificial means of nutrition, which was dated 03/03/25. However, the care plan indicated the resident was a full code. On 05/05/25 at 3:10 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the care plan had not been revised to indicate the change in code status.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living for dependent Resident #259 and #35. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living. Resident identifiers: #259 and #35. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #259 On 05/06/25 at 8:15 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #259. The review found the resident did not receive showers or bed baths for the timeframe of 03/21/25 through 03/28/25; which is seven (7) days. The resident was listed as dependent for showers and bed baths on the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 05/06/25 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no documentation to indicate the resident received showers and/or bed baths for the seven (7) days between 03/21/25 and 03/28/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of dialysis during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #48. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #48 A review of Resident #48's medical record on 05/05/25 found the resident received dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at a local dialysis center. Each day the facility completed and sent with the resident a Hemodialysis communication sheet. The sheet consisted of three (3) Sections. The first and third were to be completed pre and post dialysis by the facility's nurse. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they maintained the requirements of their policy for the time allotted for the physician to respond to gradual dose reduction recommendations from the pharmacist. The facility also failed to ensure the pharmacist identified the need for possible gradual dose reduction for a resident receiving an antidepressant. This was found to be true for 1 (one) of 42 (forty-two) residents reviewed during the annual survey process. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides completed 12 hours of required education annually. This was found to be true for one (1) of five (5) nurse aide personnel files reviewed during the annual survey process. Staff identifier: #46. Facility census: 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident # 90 was transferred in a safe manner to prevent physical injury. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #90 who sustained a laceration to her lower extremity requiring16 stitches. After the incident with Resident #90 the facility identified the failures and took appropriate action to correct the failures prior to the state agency entering the facility to conduct this complaint investigation. Therefore this will be cited as past non compliance. This was true for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. Resident Identifier: #90. Facility Census: 110. Findings Include: A) Resident #90 On 04/09/24 Nurse Aide (NA) # 136 was transferring Resident #90 from the wheelchair to the bed when the resident sustained a laceration to her right lower extremity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and investigation, the facility failed to conduct the required training and education for staff on issues which impacted resident care. Resident Identifier: #74. Facility Census: 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, investigation, and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient preparation and orientation and take steps under its control to ensure one of one resident discharge was safe and orderly. Resident #111 was taken to a local homeless shelter who was not equpieed to meet her needs to her physical limitations. Resident identifier: #111. Facility Census: 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a venous access device. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed. Resident identifier: #113. Facility Census: 110. Findings Include: a) Resident #113 On 01/29/25 at 11:30 AM a record review found Resident #113 had a central line while a resident at the facility from 10/20/23 through 01/10/24. He was transferred to the facility from a local hospital with a central ([NAME]) Intravenous line in his right chest. On 01/29/25 at 3:30 PM a record review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #133 found there was no care plan implemented for care of the central line. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide proper care for a venous access device according to their Infection Prevention Measures Policy and standard practice of care. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed. Resident identifier: #113 Facility Census: 110. Findings Include: a) Resident #113 On 01/29/25 at 11:30 AM a record review found Resident #113 had a central line while a resident at the facility from 10/20/23 through 01/10/24. He was transferred to the facility from a local hospital with a central ([NAME]) Intravenous line in his right chest. According to documentation and an interview provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/29/25 at 1:10 PM, they follow their pharmacy (PharMerica) recommendations for venous access devices which is also stated in their policy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct meetings with the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA)/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee quarterly. An effective QAPI programs are critical to improving the quality of life, and quality of care and services delivered in nursing homes. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents that currently reside at the facility. Facility census 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment, in regards of the temperature in the dining room and library used by residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents that currently reside in the facility. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to implement or develop a care plan. This is true for five (5) of 28 residents reviewed in the care plan care area. Facility identifiers: #55, #68, #22, #29 and #85. Facility census: #107.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident's received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, physician's orders were not followed. This was true for four (4) of 28 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process (LTCSP). Residents identifiers: R#95, R#3, R#29, and R#28. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and a collection of deficient practices throughout the survey process, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and/or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents that currently reside at the facility. Facility census 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure four (4) of 19 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). The POST forms were unsigned by the Resident or Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). Resident identifiers: Resident #56, R#77, R#66, and R#29. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form to two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility's beneficiary protection notification practice. This failed practice placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifiers: #102, and #80. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review titled Abuse Prohibition, resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure implemention of the facility written abuse prohibition policy in regard to investigating and reporting to proper agencies an alleged allegations of abuse. This has to potential to affect a limited number of residents that reside at the facility. Resident identifiers: R #83 and R #92. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on Abuse Policy review, Resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to identify and report all allegations of abuse and neglect to appropriate state agencies within regulation time frames. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents that reside in the facility. Resident identifiers: R#83 and R#92. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a new diagnosis of cataracts. This was true for one (1) of 28 residents reviewed under the vision/hearing care area. Resident Identifier: #85. Facility census: 107. Findings Included: a) Resident #85 On 03/13/23 at 11:25 AM, an interview was held with Resident #28. The resident stated, I'm not doing to good .I have cataracts. On 03/14/23 at 10:18 AM, a record review was completed. The record review found the resident had an eye examination on 10/20/22 stating #3 (number three) as cataracts with a follow up examination with pictures in four (4) months. (Typed as written.) The resident was noted with a vision consult on 12/15/22 for decreased vision in both eyes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Level II of the [NAME] Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was complete as directed on the initial PASARR. This was true for one (1) of one (1) PASARR's reviewed during the long term survey process. Resident identifier: #69 Facility census: #107.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Level II of the [NAME] Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed as directed on the initial PASARR. This was true for one (1) of one (1) PASSR's reviewed during the long term survey process. Resident identifier: #69 Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received necessary services in the areas of personal hygiene. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #29 and #69. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing activity program designed to meet the interests of and support the well-being of each resident. This has to potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #83. Facility census 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physicians order to provide humidity on the oxygen concentrator. This was true for one (1) of one (1) Residents reviewed in the Respiratory care area. Resident identifier: #22 Facility census: #107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete hemodialysis communication records between the facility and the dialysis center. This is true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of dialysis. Resident identifier: #64. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure timely notification of the physician of a Resident's significant weight loss. This was true for one (1) of two (2) Resident's reviewed for weight loss. Resident identifiers: R #77. Facility census: 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used without adequate indications for its use. Resident identifier: # 63. Facility census 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was offered a pneumococcal immunization in accordance with the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC). This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for immunizations. Resident identifiers: R# 56 and #35. Facility census 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the facility Smoking Policy for smoking evaluations. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed in the accident care area for smoking. Resident identifier: #55 Facility census: #107.
5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 12, 2026, 1 on May 6, 2025, 2 on March 15, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 30, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.06 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.75 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.79 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.76 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.6% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 4 |
CMS expects 4.34 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.18 on weekdays and 2.75 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.99 in April to June 2025 to 3.06 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.06 | 0.51 | 3.18 | 2.75 | 0.9% | 0 of 90 | 107 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.00 | 0.56 | 3.16 | 2.60 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.96 | 0.61 | 3.13 | 2.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.99 | 0.67 | 3.17 | 2.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 108 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.8 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.9 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Tygart Center at Fairmont Campus's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (36.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
36.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
12.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 87 eligible stays.
7.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
24.2% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
5.2% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 1539 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Genesis Healthcare, a group of 184 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2012 | |
| Gen Operations I LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Gen Operations II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Genesis Healthcare Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Genesis Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Genesis Omg Operations LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2012 | |
| Ghc Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2012 | |
| Sun Healthcare Group Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Whitman, Arnold | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 11/15/2022 | |
| Berg, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/02/2015 | |
| Bridgeford, Laura | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Mendelson, Avi | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Holler, Sara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Morris, Diane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/23/2023 | |
| Holler, Sara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Morris, Diane | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/27/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.