Find a nursing home

Home / Michigan / Mount Clemems

Martha T Berry Mcf

43533 Elizabeth Road, Mount Clemems, MI 48043 · Macomb County · (586) 469-5265

217 certified beds, about 208 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1968

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235155 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).

Of 17 health citations since November 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.05 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.60 of those hours.

44.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 2, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment including the availability of warm/hot water, for nine residents (R36, R81, R82, R85, R87, R89, R123, R136, and R160).
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the invitation and inclusion in care conferences (participation in planning their own care) of one resident (R103) of two reviewed for care planning.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely repositioning and transfer assistance for two dependent residents (R85, R160) of three observed for quality of care.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply protective heel boots (footwear used to relieve pressure on the heel) for one resident (R147) out of five reviewed for skin conditions.
November 10, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented to prevent a fall with injury for one resident (R901) of three reviewed for falls.
January 29, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an update for a preadmission screening (PAS) and resident review (ARR) /Hospital Exempted Discharge for a Level II evaluation was completed for one resident (R187) of three residents reviewed for PASARR.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intakes MI00149363 and MI00149481. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a dental care plan for one resident (R110) out of one reviewed for comprehensive care plans.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement skin interventions and date skin care treatments, for one sampled resident (R153) of three reviewed for skin.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a deep tissue injury and subsequent stage 3 pressure ulcer ( full-thickness skin loss) for one resident (R49), of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
  5. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate supervision, and effective fall interventions for one sampled resident (R117) of four residents reviewed for falls, resulting in multiple falls, and a hospitalization.
  6. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a pain patch for one sampled resident (R28) of one review for medication administration.
  7. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure a medication error rate not greater than 5%, for one resident (R181) out of four residents observed during medication pass, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.4%.
September 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake: MI00146692 Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure protection from misappropriation of property for one resident (R700) out of one resident reviewed for abuse .
November 15, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a privacy bag for a urinary drainage bag for one resident (R79) out of two reviewed for catheters, resulting in loss of privacy and dignity. Findings Include: On 11/13/2023 at 11:05 AM, R79 was observed in the dining area sitting in their wheelchair. R79 was observed to have a catheter, with no privacy bag on the urinary drainage bag. R79 was queried as to if they prefer not to have a privacy bag. R79 stated that they prefer to have a privacy bag on, and that they thought they had the drainage bag with the blue cover on it. A review of the medical record revealed that R79 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, Dysphagia, and Major Depressive Disorder. [...]
  2. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake M100139900. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that call lights remained within reach for six (R30, R62, R83, R110, R131, R136) of 13 sampled residents, resulting in resident and family member dissatisfaction with care and the potential for delayed or unmet care needs.
  3. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake MI00139058. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident (R84) from unconsentual inappropriate touching by a resident (R166) who had documented sexual behaviors of out of seven residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in emotional distress.
  4. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake MI00139900. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff cleaned rooms daily for two room areas 2131 and 3133, resulting in the potential for dissatisfaction with room conditions and the accumulation of debris.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 2, 2026, 7 on January 29, 2025, 1 on November 15, 2023.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · April 2, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 2, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · January 29, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · January 29, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.
    K 225 · January 29, 2025 · Waiver
  6. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 29, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · January 29, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · January 29, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · January 29, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · November 15, 2023 · Waiver

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.053.993.86
Registered nurses0.600.780.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.003.503.42
Nurse aides3.30
Licensed practical nurses1.15
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.5%44.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%39.2%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.47 on weekdays and 4.00 on weekends, 27% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.22 in April to June 2025 to 5.05 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.050.605.474.00 7.4%0 of 90208
Oct to Dec 20255.170.435.524.26 6.9%0 of 92207
Jul to Sep 20254.930.415.294.02 10.1%0 of 92210
Apr to Jun 20255.220.465.624.21 9.7%0 of 91202
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Michigan, Jan to Mar 20263.950.704.143.453.3%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.510.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.20.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.61.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.03.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.712.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.55.14.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.514.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.324.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
14.111.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.91.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.61.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MACOMB COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES BOARD-AN AGENCY OF MACOMB COUNTY.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Brown, RalphManaging control - governing bodyIndividual11/01/2017
Evans, KevinManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/01/2016
Flynn, CourtneyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/25/2024
Thompson, PatrickManaging control - governing bodyIndividual11/01/2016
Macomb County Human Services Board-an Agency of Macomb CountyOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2010
Morrison Management Specialists IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/01/2016
Beg, MirzaOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2011
Evans, KevinOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2016
Luyeho, ChristineOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/31/2024
Concept Rehab, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization09/20/2016
Macomb County Human Services Board-an Agency of Macomb CountyAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2010
Morrison Management Specialists IncAdp of the SNFOrganization12/01/2016
Beg, MirzaAdp of the SNFIndividual11/10/2025
Evans, KevinAdp of the SNFIndividual11/10/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 17, 2024: "Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money."

Other nursing homes nearby

Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Martha T Berry Mcf's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Martha T Berry Mcf 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Martha T Berry Mcf get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 2, 2026. The Michigan average is 9.9.
Has Martha T Berry Mcf been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Martha T Berry Mcf accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Martha T Berry Mcf?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers. Legal business name: MACOMB COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES BOARD-AN AGENCY OF MACOMB COUNTY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection