Meadowbrook at Bloomer
1840 Priddy St., Bloomer, WI 54724 · Chippewa County · (715) 568-2503
31 certified beds, about 27 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525580 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 29, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since March 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.00 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.12 of those hours.
59.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).
CMS links it to Synergy Senior Care, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
April 29, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility did not store, prepare, or serve food in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all 30 residents. ~Staff did not consistently perform hand washing during food service.~Staff did not consistently take temperatures prior to food service.~Staff did not store cold and frozen foods in a timely manner after receiving food delivery.~Surveyor observed refrigerator/freezer logs incomplete on 3 separate units.~Surveyor observed ice scoop cleaning logs not complete.~Surveyor noted dishwasher temperature logs not complete.~Surveyor observed an open gallon of milk without a date on it.~Surveyor observed tray line service audit (food temps) incomplete.~Surveyor observed [NAME] F not wearing a beard restraint. ~Surveyor observed [NAME] F touching ready to eat foods with contaminated gloves.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while handling soiled linens and laundry. This has the potential to affect 30 out of 30 residents.
- E Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 of 5 residents (R5, R7, R11, R13, & R35) or the residents' legal representatives were notified of the resident's reason for transfer/discharge in writing to the resident and their representative, notify the ombudsman of the transfer and 3 of 5 residents (R5, R7 and R11) did not receive a bed hold. R5 was transferred from the facility, and no notice of transfer was given. R5 did not have a bed hold given. R7 was transferred from the facility, no notice of transfer or bed hold was given on 1/16/26 and no reason for transfer was listed on the notice of transfer on 1/12/26. R13's notice of transfer documentation was missing the date, location R13 was transferring to and reason for the transfer. R11's notice of transfer was missing the date, R11's name, location of transfer and reason for transfer. [...]
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not follow through with the appropriate steps of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for PASARR screening. R1 did not have a PASARR level II (2) completed.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that trauma informed care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and account for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress disorder (PTSD). R11's care plan did not provide individualized interventions based on the triggers noted in R11's trauma informed assessment.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This occurred for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms observed. Surveyor observed control medication Lorazepam not double locked in a permanently affixed compartment.
March 13, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not prepare, store or distribute foods in a sanitary manner. The facility practices had the potential to affect all 25 residents. Dietary Aide (DA) G did not allow the thermometer probe to air dry of alcohol prior to inserting into glasses of milk and juice intended to be served to residents for breakfast. Resident foods that were brought in were not labeled with resident names/dates and disposed of in a manner to prevent illness. DA G was observed with her shirt, which had been sprayed with water and food debris, putting away clean dishes in a manner that contaminated the clean dishes. DA G put the clean dishes away when still saturated with water. This is evidenced by: Example 1: Surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled, Thermometer, dated February 2020. The policy, in part, read: Procedure: [...]
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect all 25 residents (R). -Residents with infection symptoms not placed on proper precautions. -Observations of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) not donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and providing proper hand hygiene prior to entering/exiting rooms for residents on precautions. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C did not wear her surgical mask in a manner (above her nose) to prevent the spread of infection during a facility outbreak of respiratory illness, covid 19 and gastrointestinal illness (GI). [...]
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not report 1 of 3 residents' (R), R131, allegations of exploitation to the State Survey Agency via the State's Misconduct Incident Reporting (MIR) system immediately upon learning of the incident.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 12 sampled residents (R) reviewed. (R18) -The MDS assessments are coded in error stating that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 2 screen had not been completed when it was completed at the time of assessment for R18.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions in the comprehensive care plan to mitigate re-traumatization for 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). -Staff were not aware there was a resident with PTSD. R18's PTSD care plan did not indicate triggers and specific interventions related to loud noises.
August 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, and R6). R1 experienced a fall after staff did not appropriately place sling for mechanical lift transfer. The facility did not ensure all direct care staff were educated on proper sling placement to ensure all other residents requiring a mechanical lift transfer, did not sustain a fall or injury during a transfer.
March 6, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions this has the ability to affect 21 of the facility's 22 residents. Low temperature chemical sanitization dish machine is used but the facility has no monitoring system in place to monitor the machine to ensure proper chemical sanitization occurs. Beard restraints were not always worn during food preparation. Oscillating fan on kitchen wall is dirty and blows towards food preparation areas. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Dishwashing Temperature Log, dated February 2020, states in part: For low temperature (chemical sanitizing) machines, concentration of sanitizer must be recorded on form. The facility policy, entitled Personal Cleanliness and Hygienic Practices, dated February 2020, states in part: [...]
- F Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandatory Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data for quarter four of 2023 (July 1 - September 30). This has the potential to affect all 22 residents. This is evidenced by: Surveyor noted during survey preparation that the facility triggered for failing to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours each day for the dates of: 07/08/23 (Saturday), 07/09/23 (Sunday), 07/22/2023 (Saturday), 08/05/2023 (Saturday), 08/06/2023 (Sunday), 09/02/23 (Saturday), 09/03/23 (Sunday), 09/04/23 (Monday), 09/16/23 (Saturday), 09/30/23 (Saturday). On 03/05/24 at 11:18 AM, Surveyor spoke with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A and Corporate Human Resources Director (CHRD) H regarding the nursing coverage for the months of July, August, and September of the 2023 year. [...]
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility did not a have a clear water management process or plan in effect with control measures to prevent transmission of Legionella infection. This has potential to effect 22 of 22 residents (R).
Fire safety inspections
14 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 29, 2026, 8 on March 13, 2025, 4 on March 6, 2024.
Every fire safety citation14 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- C Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- C Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.00 | 4.21 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.12 | 0.99 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.39 | 3.77 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.0% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 39.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.24 on weekdays and 3.39 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.25 in April to June 2025 to 4.00 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.00 | 1.12 | 4.24 | 3.39 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 27 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.44 | 1.33 | 5.68 | 4.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 21 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.40 | 1.33 | 5.70 | 4.64 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 22 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.25 | 1.53 | 5.53 | 4.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 23 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 0.95 | 4.36 | 3.74 | 8.8% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Wisconsin
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.70 | $19.03 to $22.75 | 28,370 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.65 | $28.67 to $36.06 | 7,390 |
| Registered nurses | $45.93 | $39.39 to $49.33 | 68,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 16.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.7 | 15.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.6 | 23.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.0 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BLOOMER NURSING AND REHAB LLC. CMS links this home to Synergy Senior Care, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vander Velden, Barbara | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Lindemann, Mitul | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Synergy Senior Care LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2019 | |
| Dickson, Erik | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/17/2021 | |
| Lindemann, Mitul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Shrader, Kaiya | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/10/2022 | |
| Bloomer Nursing Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/05/2022 | |
| Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren S.c. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2019 | |
| Roth & Co, LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2019 | |
| Synergy Senior Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Wipfli LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2019 | |
| Dickson, Erik | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/17/2021 | |
| Lindemann, Mitul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Maslovsky, Boris | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Pukshansky, Rostislav | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Shrader, Kaiya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/10/2022 | |
| Vander Velden, Barbara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.39 hours per resident per day, below the Wisconsin average of 3.77.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Dove Healthcare - Bloomer Bloomer, 0.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- Dove Healthcare - Regional Vent Center Chippewa Falls, 12.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Wi Veterans Home at Chippewa Falls Chippewa Falls, 13.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Chippewa Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Chippewa Falls, 13.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Meadowbrook at Chetek Chetek, 16.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Cornell Health Services Cornell, 17.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Dove Healthcare - West Eau Claire Eau Claire, 18.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Grace Lutheran Communities - River Pines Altoona, 20.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 7 citations
Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Wisconsin Board on Aging and Long Term Care, Ombudsman Program, 1-800-815-0015. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Wisconsin DHS Provider Search (Survey History), where Wisconsin publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Meadowbrook at Bloomer's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Meadowbrook at Bloomer 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Meadowbrook at Bloomer get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 29, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
- Has Meadowbrook at Bloomer been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Meadowbrook at Bloomer accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Meadowbrook at Bloomer?
- CMS lists 17 owners and managers, and links the home to Synergy Senior Care. Legal business name: BLOOMER NURSING AND REHAB LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.