Home / Minnesota / Bloomington
Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center
11501 Masonic Home Drive, Bloomington, MN 55437 · Hennepin County · (952) 948-7000
194 certified beds, about 161 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245343 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 18 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.65 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.53 of those hours.
29.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
910/23
312/24
602/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
February 12, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the D1 unit shower room was maintained in a clean, sanitary manner when 25% of the shower walls were observed to be covered with unidentified pink matter. This had the potential to affect 27 of the 29 residents who resided on D1 and utilized the shower room on a routine basis.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring the call light was accessible for 2 of 2 residents (R144, and R45) reviewed for call lights.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include the methods staff utilized and found effective for behavioral de-escalation for 1 of 1 residents (R101) reviewed for behavioral symptoms of dementia.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents using a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine had appropriate orders for use to include equipment setting and humidification as appropriate for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R91, and R150) reviewed for respiratory equipment.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 residents (R31) who were observed to be served and expressed concerns about inappropriate food temperature.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R8), reviewed for EBP.
December 18, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure care-planned interventions to promote appropriate fluid balance were consistently implemented and accurately tracked to promote continuity of care for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed who received hemodialysis and was on a fluid restriction.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders, or notify the provider of resident's refusal for 1 of 1 residents (R88) reviewed for cervical collar use. In addition, the facility failed to implement and reassess an individualized bowel management (BM) protocol for 1 of 1 resident (R60) reviewed for constipation.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess wounds including measurements weekly for 1 of 3 residents (R52) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
October 19, 2023Standard inspection · 9 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to immediately report incidents of potential resident to resident sexual abuse to the state agency (SA) within two hours, as required for 2 of 2 residents (R97, R112) reviewed for abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a potential incidence of sexual abuse for was investigated for 2 of 2 residents (R97, R112) reviewed for potential abuse.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed prior to admission for 1 of 1 residents (R96).
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive agenda and selection of meaningful activities, including group-based activities, was provided or offered for 2 of 2 residents (R19, R92) reviewed for activity participate on the short-term stay (i.e., TCU) unit.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess the root cause of falls, and incorporate new fall interventions, to prevent falls and injury for one of one resident (R110) who had frequent falls.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a feeding tube was in functioning order to promote comfort, prevent the spread of infection and prevent further malnutrition for 1 of 1 residents (R134) reviewed for tube feedings.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine to reduce the risk of complication (i.e., respiratory infection) for 1 of 1 residents (R76) observed for CPAP use.
- D Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dementia services were provided which included an initial comprehensive assessment and on-going assessments regarding sexual consent capacity for 2 of 2 residents (R97, R112) with cognitive impairment who were reviewed for dementia care.
- B Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure all residents, including those who resided in the transitional care units (TCU), were notified and afforded an opportunity to attend the facility-based, routinely held resident council meetings which impeded these residents' right to participate in resident groups within the nursing home. This had the potential to affect 69 of 69 residents identified to resident on the TCU during the survey.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 5 on February 12, 2026, 6 on December 18, 2024, 4 on October 19, 2023.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.65 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.53 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.09 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.44 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 29.4% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 25.8% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.87 on weekdays and 4.09 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.81 in April to June 2025 to 4.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.65 | 1.53 | 4.87 | 4.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 161 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.66 | 1.56 | 4.87 | 4.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 161 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.69 | 1.60 | 4.92 | 4.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 160 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.81 | 1.66 | 5.05 | 4.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 157 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.1 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.6 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.2 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.4 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MINNESOTA MASONIC HOME CARE CENTER.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mork, Susan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/23/2010 | |
| Pelava, Patricia | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Schroeder, Beth | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/01/2017 | |
| Berg, Dayton | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Campbell, Douglas | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Cook, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Fendler, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Hanson, Mary | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Himmler, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Johnson, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Krall, Tony | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| McCurdy, Joyce | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| McNear, Roger | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Neetenbeek, Eric | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Proctor, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Rosenzweig, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Shirley, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Solem, Foster | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Studell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Sullivan, Burnett | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/15/2015 | |
| Willette, Pam | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Mn Masonic Elder Services | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/1992 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 19, 2023: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington Bloomington, 2.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- The Estates at Bloomington LLC Bloomington, 4.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Friendship Village of Bloomington Bloomington, 4.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center Burnsville, 4.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Martin Luther Care Center Bloomington, 4.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Flagstone Eden Prairie, 5.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- The Villas at Richfield Richfield, 6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Aurora on France Edina, 6.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 12, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center?
- CMS lists 22 owners and managers. Legal business name: MINNESOTA MASONIC HOME CARE CENTER.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.