Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Corpus Christi

Mirador

5857 Timbergate Dr, Corpus Christi, TX 78414 · Nueces County · (361) 994-0905

41 certified beds, about 34 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2011

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676303 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 1, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 21 health citations since March 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $22,922 in the last three years; the largest was $14,901, and the latest is dated April 25, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.

37.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Methodist Retirement Communities, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
3J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
2E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 1, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and food storage. The facility failed to ensure the hot chocolate and latte dispenser nozzle was clean and free from corrosion. The facility failed to ensure all expired foods were discarded. The facility failed to ensure all foods were securely closed, labeled, and dated. The facility failed to ensure staff did not enter the kitchen without a hairnet. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean. The facility failed to ensure all chemicals in the cleaning and chemical storage area in the kitchen were appropriately labeled. These failures placed residents at risk for cross contamination and food-borne illness.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive careplan was developed and implemented for each resident consistentwith resident rights; to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residentsmedical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensiveassessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement Resident #16's care plan for fallinterventions. The failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving adequate or required careThe
  3. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure thatresidents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care consistent withprofessional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and theresidents' goals and preferences to include Oxygen in Use sign posted at the door to resident's room for 1 (Resident #16) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratorycare.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's Nasal Cannula, (a small, flexibleplastic tube worn under the nose that delivers supplemental oxygen therapy), wasfree of kinks. (A kink in the Nasal Cannula restricts the flow of prescribed oxygen tothe patient).2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's oxygen concentrator, (a medicaldevice that.delivers concentrated oxygen.to patients with respiratory conditions),was set at the oxygen liters ordered by the physician. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to hold Resident #25's carvedilol (medication that lowers blood pressure and heart rate) when Resident #25's heart rate was outside of physician's parameters twice on 06/27/26 and once on 06/28/26. These failures could place residents at risk for complications such as decreased blood pressure, decreased heart rate, exacerbation of symptoms, and potential hospitalization.
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for medications stored in 1 of 4 medication carts (Side 2 Medication Aide Cart) reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure the timolol eye drops (lowers pressure in the eye) for Resident #5 in the Side 2 Medication Aide Cart were labeled with the date they were opened. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of receiving expired medications from staff.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure the ADON knew the proper techniques and practices to keep the wound from becoming contaminated by a dirty brief during wound care on 07/01/2026. The facility failed to ensure the ADON performed proper or adequate hand hygiene while performing wound care on 07/01/2026. The facility failed to ensure the ADON donned (to put on) proper PPE during wound care on 07/01/2026. The facility failed to ensure CNA-C donned proper PPE during wound care on 07/01/2026. [...]
May 29, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food served under sanitary conditions. The handwashing sink's water drainage box was dirty with a black substance and the drainage plug was loose. A large frying pan was on the kitchen floor beneath a cooking table and near the cooking stoves. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination, food borne illness and a diminished quality of life.
  2. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from chemical restraints related to PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except as provided in §483.45(e)(5), if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #132) reviewed for chemical restraint, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #132 was prescribed a psychotropic drug for anxiety, no longer than 14 days PRN (as needed). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications.
  3. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that medical records were accurately maintained for each resident, as documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #132) reviewed for the accuracy of their medical records. The facility failed to ensure that documentation on Resident #132's chart accurately reflected an allergy to Azithromycin (an Antibiotic). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving improper care.
April 29, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to include measurable objectives and timeframes to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 5 (Resident #1 and #2) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: The facility failed to revise or update Resident #1's care plan to reflect the need and order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility failed to revise or update Resident #2's care plan to reflect the need and order for Contact Precautions. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for not receiving appropriate interventions or care to meet their current needs.
April 25, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. J
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it · disputed by the home (informal dispute resolution)
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for injuries. The facility failed when CNA A did not ensure Resident #1 was medically assessed before picking up Resident #1 off the floor after she fell off the bed and CNA A left her unattended and misaligned in bed on 09/07/2024. Resident #1 sustained a femur fracture and her feeding tube was dislodged as a result of the fall. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified as past non-compliance on 04/25/25. The non-compliance began on 09/07/24 and ended on 09/07/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began on 04/11/25. [...]
  2. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it · disputed by the home (informal dispute resolution)
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards and supervision on 09/07/24. The facility failed to identify and eliminate a foreseeable fall. CNA A left Resident #1 unattended and did not ensure her body was positioned in a safe manner when providing incontinent care resulting in Resident #1 falling off her bed, sustaining a femur fracture, and her feeding tube to be dislodged. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified as past non-compliance on 04/25/25. The non-compliance began on 09/07/24 and ended on 09/07/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began on 04/11/25. [...]
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it · disputed by the home (informal dispute resolution)
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, including hand hygiene, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA A wore a gown before entering a contact isolation room to perform incontinent care on 09/07/24. The facility failed to ensure CNA A wore his face mask properly while in a contact isolation room for a communicable disease on 09/07/24. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene before putting on gloves to perform incontinent care on 09/07/24. [...]
May 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult/ notify the physician when the resident experienced a significant change in their physical status for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for physician notification of changes. The facility failed to consult with/notify the physician after Resident #1 displayed significant changes in condition on 05/06/24 such as lethargy, vomiting, a decrease of oxygen saturation of 85%, irregular lung sounds and after requiring resuscitation efforts. Resident #1 expired on 05/06/24. On 05/24/24 at 4:45 PM, an immediate jeopardy was identified. [...]
  2. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for four (Residents #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) of four Residents reviewed for privacy issues, in that: 1. RN A did not lock her electronic health record computer screen on 07/06/2024, exposing Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4's medical records to the community residents and visitors. This failure could place residents at risk for embarrassment, poor self-esteem, and unmet needs.
March 29, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff facial hair was fully covered by beard restraints. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff used proper hand hygiene during meal preparation. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were dated and properly sealed. The facility failed to ensure pantry food items when opened were dated and properly sealed. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 resident (#6) out of 24 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not accurately reflect he had Hospice as a service provider and he was not on a therapeutic diet. This deficient practice could affect residents with MDS assessments and could result in inaccurate care.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 residents (Resident #6, Resident #10) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's bowel status was reflected in the resident's care plan (undated). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's code status was not reflected in resident's care plan. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving proper care and services.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #88) reviewed for care plan revisions. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's care plan was updated to reflect she was not on contact isolation for shingles. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #88's care plan was updated to reflect DNR (do not resuscitate) code status. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of one facility treatment cart observed. The facility failed to ensure the treatment care was secured when unattended. This deficient practice could affect residents and visitors and result in misappropriation of medications and injury. The finding was: Observation on 03/26/24 at 10:44 a.m. the facility treatment cart left unsecured During observation and an interview with LVN E on 03/26/2024 at 10:46 a.m., who then secured the cart, stated the cart was not supposed to be left unsecured Items in the cart included: antibiotic ointment, syringes and needles, and wound care cleanser and dressing supplies. [...]
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #10 and #85) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to keep Resident #10's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag from touching the floor, and CNA F placed it onto Resident #10's bed after it was on the floor when she performed catheter care for the resident. 2. The facility failed to keep Resident #85's indwelling urinary catheter bag from touching the floor and CNA G placed the bag which touched the floor onto the bed and then into the resident's lap when she transferred her from the bed to her wheelchair. [...]

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on May 29, 2025.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 29, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
April 25, 2025Fine $14,901
May 25, 2024Fine $8,021

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.723.393.86
Registered nurses0.760.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.032.983.42
Nurse aides2.63
Licensed practical nurses1.33
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)37.5%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover57.1%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.00 on weekdays and 4.03 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.72 in April to June 2025 to 4.72 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.720.765.004.03 0.0%0 of 9034
Oct to Dec 20254.830.605.124.09 0.0%0 of 9233
Jul to Sep 20254.470.784.703.90 0.0%0 of 9236
Apr to Jun 20254.721.044.994.06 0.0%0 of 9134
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.615.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.90.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.73.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.11.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.93.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.09.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.125.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.012.312.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MRC SENIOR LIVING CORPUS CHRISTI. CMS links this home to Methodist Retirement Communities, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 4.7 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Methodist Retirement Communities5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization05/01/2019
Mrc Senior Living Corpus Christi5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization05/01/2019
The Aldersgate Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%04/30/2019
Truist Bank5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization12/06/2019
Baggett, AlyceCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2013
Besser, AliciaCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Brown, AlanCorporate directorIndividual04/13/2020
Bunch, JamesCorporate directorIndividual08/13/2020
Conger, DaleCorporate directorIndividual02/21/2020
Gilts, KipCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2020
King, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2018
Koerner, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual02/21/2020
Malone-Wardley, RomonicaCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2023
Morgan, RichardCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2017
Simmons, EdCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Watson, FrankieCorporate directorIndividual11/12/2021
Williamson, BillyCorporate directorIndividual07/15/2020
Woodward, WalterCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Brown, AlanCorporate officerIndividual04/13/2020
Currie, MatthewCorporate officerIndividual08/21/2025
Stephens, DonaldCorporate officerIndividual05/01/2019
Childress, CharlesOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/30/2024
Gonzales, LisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/18/2025
Partin, ToddOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2019
Thomas, AmyOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2018
Coastal Bend Family Practice, PaAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2019
The Aldersgate TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization04/30/2019
Gonzales, LisaAdp of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Mirador's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Mirador 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Mirador get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 1, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Mirador been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $22,922 in the last three years.
Does Mirador accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Mirador?
CMS lists 28 owners and managers, and links the home to Methodist Retirement Communities. Legal business name: MRC SENIOR LIVING CORPUS CHRISTI.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection