Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
2735 Airline Rd, Corpus Christi, TX 78414 · Nueces County · (361) 992-0816
120 certified beds, about 110 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676107 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 5, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since February 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $13,397 in the last three years; the largest was $13,397, and the latest is dated January 8, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.00 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.
59.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
March 30, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice, that were complete and accurately documented, for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for meal percentage logs. The facility failed to document the meal percentages in Resident #1's electronic health record on 02/28/2026, 03/17/2026, and 03/23/2026 as per the facility's Medical Record documentation Policy. This failure could jeopardize residents from receiving adequate nutrition and assessment which could compromise the residents' specific dietary needs. Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 03/28/2026 revealed Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE]. [...]
November 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk for needs and accommodation being unmet. [...]
June 5, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 4 (100 hall glucometer, 200 hall glucometer, 300 hall glucometer, and 400 hall glucometer) of 8 glucometers (device used to measure the amount of glucose in a resident's blood) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the 2 glucometers in the 200-hall nurse cart and 2 glucometers in the 400-hall nurse cart were tested for accuracy and recorded in the glucometer logbook on 06/01/25, 06/02/25 and 06/03/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure the 2 glucometers in the 100-hall nurse cart and 2 glucometers in the 300-hall nurse cart were tested for accuracy and recorded in the glucometer logbook on 06/03/25. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented within a timely manner for each resident consistent with resident rights to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #39) out of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to review or revise Resident #39's care plan after a significant change in condition when Resident #39's code status changed from full code to DNR on [DATE]. This failure could place resident at risk for receiving inadequate care and services.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to ensure the wound care nurse knew the proper technique for cleansing the venous stasis ulcer during wound care in order to prevent cross-contamination and infection. The deficient practice and failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination, infection, and improper wound healing.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (Residents #17) of one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter reviewed received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI's): The facility failed to ensure Resident #17 ' s urinary drainage tubing and catheter drainage bag were kept from touching and resting on the floor. This failure could affect any resident with an indwelling urinary catheter and place them at risk of developing or increased UTI's.
April 10, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 9 of 12 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1) The facility failed to ensure ADON D disposed of one tablet of Hydrocodone-APAP 10-325 mg by properly including a witness signature on the narcotic sheet when destroyed on 02/28/25 for Resident #2. 2) The facility failed to ensure ADON D disposed of one tablet of Hydrocodone-APAP 10-325 mg by properly including a witness signature on the narcotic sheet when destroyed on 03/04/25 for Resident #3. [...]
- D Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the residents' representatives the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to record any documentation showing any care plan meeting involving Resident #1 or their RP occurred during her stay at the facility from her admission date on 05/29/24 through her discharge date of 12/31/24. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care, accidents, and injuries.
March 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ICP, ADON, DON, staff nurses and CNAs knew the proper placement of PPE carts. 2. The facility failed to ensure PPE carts were posted outside of the EBP rooms of Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination and/or infection.
February 27, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriations of resident property, and exploitation for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was free from abuse. On 04/30/24, Resident #2 intentionally pinched Resident #1 on the left arm because Resident #1 put her fingers into Resident #2's cup of ice. Resident #1 sustained bruising from the pinches. Resident #2 was transferred to another facility on 05/01/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and physical, mental, and psychosocial harm.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs. The facility failed to ensure LVN-D and LVN-E both were competent in counting their narcotics correctly, as well as competent in keeping control of the narcotic keys appropriately. On 02/26/25 prior to shift change, LVN-D failed to count her narcotics off with LVN-E prior to leaving at the end of her shift, as well as LVN-E failed to secure the narcotic key on her body or person, but left it sitting in a cabinet at the nurses station. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured and stored in accordance with current accepted professional principles for 2 of 4 medication carts observed for medication storage in that: The facility failed to ensure the 400 hall medication cart and the 100 hall medication cart were locked and/or secured. This failure could place the residents at risk of gaining access to unlocked medications that were not prescribed to them.
June 5, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 2 of 8 medication carts observed for compliance. Two medication carts in the 100 hall were left unlocked and unattended by CMA B. This failure could place residents at risk of access and ingestion of non-narcotic medications. This failure had the potential to affect all 29 residents in the 100 hall.
April 12, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 Residents ( Resident's #10, #68, #70, and #91) of 9 reviewed for care plans. 1. Resident #10's comprehensive care plan dated 03/23/23 did not reflect he was a smoker nor had a Smoking Safety Screen 2. Resident #68's comprehensive care plan dated 09/28/23 did not reflect she was a smoker nor had a Smoking Safety Screen 3. Resident #70's comprehensive care plan dated 02/27/23 did not reflect he was a smoker nor had a Smoking Safety Screen 4. [...]
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, to include providing and obtaining clinical laboratory services to meet the needs of its 28 residents who receive insulin services. The facility failed to keep a log documenting the control solution testing results for the facility's glucometers. This failure could result in not determining if the glucometers were functioning properly and/or obtaining false glucometer readings.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 nutrition room reviewed for sanitation in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure a juice dispenser gun was sanitary 2. The facility failed to ensure equipment was clean and sanitized 3. The facility failed to ensure dry goods were dated, labeled, and sealed. 4. The facility failed to ensure spices were not left open to the air 5. The facility failed to ensure items in the nutrition room's refrigerator were labeled, dated, and not expired 6. The facility failed to ensure items in the nutrition room were labeled, dated, and not expired 7. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen was following their policies These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 3 residents (Resident #13, Resident #29, and Resident #55) of 26 residents that were reviewed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practices, in that: The facility failed to ensure ADON A, HR personnel, and CNA A did not grab resident's' cups and bowls by the rim with bare hands, contaminating the tops of the rims, during the lunch meal serving process. These failures could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens.
- D Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for 2 of 6 (Resident #35, and Resident #35)) residents reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #14, and Resident #35 were treated with dignity in that: Resident #14 and Resident #35's room had a strong odor of urine. Resident #35's floor mat was saturated in urine Resident #35's mattress was saturated in urine, had discoloration, and was stained. Resident #14 and Resident #35's floor was sticky This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable, a diminished quality of life, and decline in self-worth.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to a safem clean, comfortable environment for two (Resident #14, and Resident #35) of six residents reviewed for resident rights. -Resident #14 and Resident #35's room had a strong odor of urine. -Resident #35's floor mat was saturated in urine -Resident #35's mattress was saturated in urine, had discoloration, and was stained. -Resident #14 and Resident #35's floor was sticky This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable, a diminished quality of life, and decline in self-worth.
- D Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility must dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 3 of 3 dumpsters (dumpsters A, B, and C) reviewed for garbage disposal. The facility failed to ensure the dumpsters A, B, andC's lids and doors were secured. The facility failed to ensure the dumpsters A, B, and C's were not overflowing This failure could place residents at risk of infection from improperly disposed garbage.
- D Have policies on smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for smoking and compliance in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 was wearing a smoking apron the facility implemented as part of their resident's Smoking Policy assessment. This deficient practice could affect residents who smoke and require a smoking apron byand contributeing to a smoking-related injury, fire, and an unsafe smoking environment.
March 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Residents # 8, #22, and #23) reviewed for abuse, in that: Resident #8 was told by CNA X that she could use the restroom by herself and spoke to her very unprofessionally. Resident #8 was left being fearful of falling, and feared retaliation. Residents #22 and #23 both described CNA X as having left them in wet briefs after asking to be changed Leaving Resident #23 feeling humiliated. This failure placed residents at risk of fear, humiliation, and a diminished quality of life.
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 4 of 74 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure they had an RN on duty on Sunday, 02/11/24, Sunday, 02/25/24, Saturday, 03/09/24, and Sunday, 03/10/24. This failure could place residents at risk of missed nursing assessments, interventions, and treatment.
January 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- K Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #3) of11 residents reviewed for pharmacy services, in that:. LVN C failed to accurately reconcile Resident #3's heart medications of: Hydralazine 50mg Q8hr, Metoprolol 50mg Q12hr, Isosorbide dinitrate 20mg daily, or Nifedipine 20mg Q8hr was not acquired and administered from 11/16/2023-11/24/2023 (8days). Resident #3 was admitted to the hospital from dialysis with diagnoses including NSTEMI type 2 (heart attack), Atrial fibrillation. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/16/23 and ended on 11/28/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
- J Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #3) was admitted with physician order for their care reviewed for admission orders, in that. LVN C failed to accurately reconcile Resident #3's hospital instructions to resume medications with the physician for her prescribed heart medication of: Hydralazine 50mg Q8hr, Metoprolol 50mg Q12hr, Isosorbide dinitrate 20mg daily, or Nifedipine 20mg Q8hr from 11/16/2023-11/24/2023 (8days). The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/16/23 and ended on 11/28/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could have jeopardized the well-being of Resident #3 as well as could have led to the demise of Resident #3.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured properly for one of two nurse medication carts (Hall 300 nurse medication cart) and one of one wound care treatment carts (Hall 300) reviewed for drug storage. -Nurse medication cart on Hall 300 was left unlocked and unattended. -Wound Care Treatment cart on Hall 300 was left unlocked and unattended. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for harm to unauthorized people and place the facility at risk for possible drug diversion.
October 9, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of eight residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. 1. The facility did not comply with Resident's #1 request to no longer permit the wound care nurse in his room, after explicitly requesting she no longer be in his room. 2. The facility staff did not provide Resident #2 with a certified professional sign language interpreter, when one was requested days prior to doctor's appointment. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for infection control, in that: CNA A did not remove her contaminated gloves nor performed hand hygiene after touching multiple surfaces prior to initiating Resident #3's perineal care. These failures could place residents at risk for contamination and infection.
February 9, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations
Fire safety inspections
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on February 9, 2023.
Every fire safety citation1 citation
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 8, 2024 | Fine | $13,397 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.00 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.86 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.84 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.8% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.13 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.95 in April to June 2025 to 3.00 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.00 | 0.29 | 3.13 | 2.67 | 0.0% | 3 of 90 | 110 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.03 | 0.33 | 3.16 | 2.69 | 1.1% | 2 of 92 | 110 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.07 | 0.26 | 3.21 | 2.73 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 107 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.95 | 0.26 | 3.07 | 2.65 | 0.2% | 0 of 91 | 110 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.7 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.4 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DEWITT MEDICAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewitt Medical District | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Alexander, Alma | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/27/2020 | |
| Baird, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/13/2021 | |
| Carvajal, Antonio | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/16/2024 | |
| Clapp, Barbara | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Cortese, Daren | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Frels, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/04/2014 | |
| Gibson, Patricia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Gonzales, Veronica | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/16/2024 | |
| Kaufman, Nicole | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Mandelbaum, Elliot | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Papacek, Charles | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/01/1997 | |
| Sheppard, Anna | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2019 | |
| Sheppard, Cynthia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/25/2013 | |
| Alexander, Alma | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/27/2020 | |
| Dewitt Medical District | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Regency IHS of Corpus Christi LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Campbell, Stuart | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/10/2024 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| 2735 Airline Road LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Csv Rhea Management Holdco, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Dewitt Medical District | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/20/2025 | |
| Dwd Tx Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Reg Hg Opco 1, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Reg Hg Opco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Reg Operator Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Regency IHS Master Tenant LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Regency IHS of Corpus Christi LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/20/2025 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/20/2025 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/20/2025 | |
| Regency Texas Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Ahmad, Shahab | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Campbell, Stuart | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/10/2024 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Pena, Nicole | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Rodriguez, Monica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 30, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 10, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.67 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Wooldridge Place Nursing Center Corpus Christi, 0.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Mirador Corpus Christi, 1.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Cimarron Place Health & Rehabilitation Corpus Christi, 1.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- The Palms Nursing & Rehabilitation Corpus Christi, 2.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 59 citations
- San Rafael Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Corpus Christi, 4.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 54 citations
- Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Corpu Corpus Christi, 6.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Alameda Oaks Nursing Center Corpus Christi, 7.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Morga Corpus Christi, 7.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 5, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $13,397 in the last three years.
- Does Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 40 owners and managers, and links the home to Wellsential Health. Legal business name: DEWITT MEDICAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.