Find a nursing home

Home / New York / East Islip

Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing

340 East Montauk Highway, East Islip, NY 11730 · Suffolk County · (631) 581-6400

160 certified beds, about 150 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335401 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 9, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 10 health citations since October 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.16 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.91 of those hours.

35.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).

CMS links it to Paragon Healthnet, an affiliated group of 11 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 9, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/09/2025, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for each resident to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #57) of twelve (12) residents reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, Resident #57 had a physician's order for Contact Precautions dated 08/12/2025; however, there was no Comprehensive Care Plan developed for Contact Precautions with measurable goals and interventions. [...]
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/09/2025, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team to reflect the resident's current status. This was identified for one (1)(Resident #1) (1)of one resident reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan was not updated to indicate the changes in the interventions related to offloading the resident's heels (both extremities). The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Care, dated 10/30/2024, documented to Avoid positioning the resident on a pressure injury. If unavoidable, attempt to limit the duration of the pressure on these areas. [...]
  3. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (800725) initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/09/2025, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This was identified for one (1) (Resident # 92) of three (3) residents reviewed for Pain Management. Specifically, Resident #92 had a diagnosis of Spinal and Hip Fractures and had a physician's order for Acetaminophen (pain reliever) for 14 days on 08/05/2025. The pain medication order was not renewed after 14 days. [...]
  4. D
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    F710 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (800725 ) initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/09/2025, the facility did not ensure that the medical care of each resident was supervised by a Physician, including monitoring changes in the resident's status and the need for changes in the treatment. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #92) of three (3) residents reviewed for Pain Management. Specifically, Resident #92 had a diagnosis of Spinal and Hip Fractures and had a physician's order for Acetaminophen (pain reliever) for 14 days on 08/05/2025. The pain medication order was not renewed after 14 days. The resident was evaluated by Pain Management Nurse Practitioner #2 on 09/07/2025 and recommended to continue Acetaminophen for pain management without reviewing the resident's physician's orders. [...]
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/09/2025, the facility did not ensure it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #57) of twelve (12) residents reviewed for Infection Control, and two (2) (Resident #19 and Resident #156) of two (2) residents reviewed during the Medication Storage task. Specifically, 1) Resident #57 had a physician's order for Contact Precautions due to Clostridium Difficile (a bacterium that causes severe diarrhea and intestinal inflammation) infection. Certified Nursing Assistant #4 was observed entering and exiting Resident #57's room without putting on and removing Personal Protective Equipment. [...]
June 11, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY 00330563) initiated on 06/04/2024 and completed on 06/11/2024 the facility did not ensure Intravenous antibiotics were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician's orders and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #98) of one resident reviewed for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter. Specifically, Resident #98 was observed with a Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in their right arm. There were no physician orders for the placement of the Peripheral Intravenous Catheter and monitoring of the Peripheral Intravenous Catheter site. The finding is: [...]
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/4/2024 and completed on 6/11/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #90) of three residents reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, Resident #90 had a physician's order for Contact Enteric Isolation due to Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff-bacteria that causes inflammation of the colon) infection. On 6/7/2024, Certified Nursing Assistant #4 was observed providing perineal care to Resident #90 after a bowel movement. When the perineal care was completed, Certified Nursing Assistant #4 removed their dirty gloves and put on a new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene. [...]
October 5, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey started on 9/28/2022 and was completed on 10/5/2022, the facility did not follow proper sanitation practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. Specifically, on 9/29/2022 at 2:20 PM, the dish machine was observed running with a Wash temperature of 148 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a Rinse temperature of 174 degrees F when the manufacturer specifications stated that the Wash temperature should be a minimum of 160 degrees F and the Rinse temperature be a minimum of 180 degrees F. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Sanitation of Dishware dated 1/12/2011 documented to take dishmachine temperatures three times per day to enable proper washing and sanitation. Procedures included: [...]
  2. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey started on 9/28/2022 and completed on 10/5/2022 the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. This was identified for 2 of 33 opportunities during the medication pass observation, resulting in a 6 % medication error rate. Specifically, during the medication pass observation 1) Registered Nurse (RN) #1 administered a Sucralfate tablet (a medication used to treat and prevent gastric and intestinal ulcers) to Resident # 91 while the resident was eating breakfast; however, the Physician ordered the medication to be administered on an empty stomach. 2) Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administered Gabapentin (a medication used to treat nerve pain) to Resident # 302 at the wrong time. The finding is: [...]
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/28/2022 and completed on 10/5/2022, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This was identified on one of four medication carts reviewed during the Medication Storage and Labeling Task. Specifically, Resident #80's two Admelog insulin vials were observed opened with no date to indicate when the insulin vials were first opened. The finding is: The Facility's Medication Labeling Policy and Procedure dated 8/2021 documented that upon opening insulin pens/vials, the licensed nurse will write the date opened. Resident #80 was admitted with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, and Malnutrition. [...]

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on September 9, 2025, 1 on October 5, 2022.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · September 9, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · October 5, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.163.633.86
Registered nurses0.910.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.413.183.42
Nurse aides2.17
Licensed practical nurses1.08
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)35.7%40.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover55.8%39.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 5.34 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.46 on weekdays and 3.41 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.36 in April to June 2025 to 4.16 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.160.914.463.41 1.0%0 of 90150
Oct to Dec 20254.190.834.473.47 0.7%0 of 92143
Jul to Sep 20254.260.884.483.71 0.8%0 of 92140
Apr to Jun 20254.360.844.653.63 0.9%0 of 91141
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
New York, Jan to Mar 20263.550.683.723.139.8%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for New York

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
New York, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$23.36$21.04 to $24.9987,990
LPNs and LVNs$32.30$29.52 to $37.0039,400
Registered nurses$52.62$45.60 to $62.34205,810
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.114.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.60.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.612.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.56.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.613.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
14.920.623.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.79.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.11.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.51.41.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

61.1% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 1,079 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 868 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 733 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

68.0% this home

Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 325 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.0% this home

Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 621 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.1% this home

Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 621 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 408 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SUFFOLK RESTORATIVE THERAPY & NURSING, LLC. CMS links this home to Paragon Healthnet, a group of 11 nursing homes averaging 4.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Laufer, Issac5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%11/17/2010
Lebowitz, Chaim5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual25%11/17/2010
Lebowitz, Max5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual25%11/17/2010
Laufer, IssacManaging control - governing bodyIndividual11/17/2010
Lebowitz, ChaimManaging control - governing bodyIndividual11/17/2010
Lebowitz, MaxManaging control - governing bodyIndividual11/17/2010
Polimeni, LisaCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Aplustille, JosephOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/10/2012
Itzkowitz, JayOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2023
Rai, PaulinderOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/19/2022
340 East Montauk Highway LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/30/2026
Aplustille, JosephAdp of the SNFIndividual03/30/2026
Rai, PaulinderAdp of the SNFIndividual11/14/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 9, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 9, 2025: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 9, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 5, 2022: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in East Islip

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.

Assisted living in New York

New York contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 9, 2025. The New York average is 8.1.
Has Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Momentum at South Bay for Rehabilation and Nursing?
CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to Paragon Healthnet. Legal business name: SUFFOLK RESTORATIVE THERAPY & NURSING, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection