Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Chillicothe

Morningside Center

1700 Morningside Drive, Chillicothe, MO 64601 · Livingston County · (660) 646-0170

60 certified beds, about 53 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265813 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 20, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 22 health citations since June 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.98 of those hours.

50.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
4D
16E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 20, 2026Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Do Not Resuscitate Order's (DNR, medical order that instructs the health care provider not to do resuscitative measures if a person's heart stops) for Resident #29, Resident #13 and Resident #21 were correct when the Durable Power of Attorney's (DPOA) a legal document that authorizes a designee to manage financial or medical affairs if the person became incapacitated, name was printed on the DNR instead of the name of the resident on Resident #29's DNR, and when the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident #13 and Resident #21) had physician letters of incapacitation prior to the Power of Attorney designee making decisions for him/her. This affected three of 14 sampled residents (Resident #29, Resident #13 and Resident #21). The facility census was 56. [...]
  2. E
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #7) when the facility failed to accurately document a diagnosis of Resident #1 and failed to accurately document a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for Resident #7. The facility census was 56. The facility did not provide a resident assessment or Minimum Data Set (MDS) policy. MDS is a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff in accordance with specified formats and timelines in conducting comprehensive assessments as part of an ongoing process through which the facility identifies preferences and goals of care, functional and health status, strengths and needs. 1. [...]
  3. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. When facility staff did not address UTI (urinary tract infection) with antibiotic usage for two residents (Resident #25 and Resident #14), did not address use of anticoagulant medication or therapeutic activities for one resident (Resident #52) and when dementia care had not been cared planned for one resident (Resident #29 & Resident #52). This affected four of the 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. [...]
  4. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed ensure professional standards of quality of care and all services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice when licensed nursing staff administered medications without verification of the order prior to administration for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #34) and when not maintaining proper nursing techniques and infection control measures for the removal and insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter for two residents (Resident #25 and Resident #5). The affected four residents out of the 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated Catheter Insertion and Removal Policy showed: [...]
  5. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff failed to provide complete perineal care for Residents #13, #5, #7, #50 after an incontinence episode. This affected four of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. [...]
  6. E
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident #5 & #25) who had urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine from the body), received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections when the facility failed to provide proper catheter care management. The affected two of the sampled 14 residents. The facility census was 56Review of the facility's undated Catheter Insertion and Removal Policy showed: -To remove catheter: put on disposable gloves, attach syringe to balloon port of catheter and aspirate entire amount of sterile water in balloon; -Pinch catheter and withdraw gently and slowly; [...]
  7. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with an error rate of less than five percent (5%). When staff failed to verify a physician's order prior to the administration of insulin and narcotic medications resulting in two errors out of 25 opportunities for error, which resulted in an error rate of 8%. This affected two of the 14 sampled residents, (Resident #1 and #34). The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication administration-general guidelines, revised 8/16, showed: [...]
  8. E
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident #1, and Resident # 34) were free from significant medication errors when RN B failed to verify an insulin and narcotic order prior to the administration of both, placing both residents at risk for negative outcome to their health and safety. This affected two residents out of 25 possibilities for a significant medication order. The facility census was 56. The facility was unable to provide any policy regarding a significant medication error. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission baseline care plan showed the resident was alert and oriented with cognition intact and a recent re-admission to the facility. The resident was an insulin dependent diabetic and took insulin with all meals. [...]
  9. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner to prevent infection or the possibility of infection when the facility staff failed to maintain sterile precautions when placing a urinary catheter (a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) for one Residents (Residents #5) out of the 14 sampled residents, and additionally when dietary staff failed to wash hands when serving water on 300 hall without performing hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's undated Catheter Insertion and Removal Policy showed: -After donning sterile gloves, use one hand to expose urinary meatus, with the other hand, cleanse resident using one stroke downward and discarding cleanser, repeat the same procedure with other side of meatus; [...]
January 14, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident #2) right to be free from physical abuse when Resident #1 slapped Resident #2 on the cheek. The facility census was 52. [...]
January 16, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to assure staff treated residents in a manner that maintained their dignity when staff failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner which affected six of the 13 sampled residents, (Resident #15, #47, #45, #1, #27 and #53. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents Call System, revised September 2022, showed: - Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized work station; - Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor; - Calls for assistance are answered as soon as possible, but no later than five minutes; - Urgent requests for assistance are addressed immediately. [...]
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow up with resident's grievances regarding quality of life and resident care or then they did not provide a rationale or response to resident council. This had the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility's Grievance Policy, dated 1/1/24 showed: -All grievances would be handled promptly and according to federal regulations; -Provide a written response to the complaint, including: a summary of findings, actions taken or planned to resolve the grievance; -Conduct follow-up with the complainant to ensure satisfaction with the resolution; -All staff will receive training on residents' grievance rights and this policy during orientation and annually thereafter. Review of resident council minutes dated 9/24/24, 10/29/24, and 12/31/24 showed: [...]
  3. E
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    F678 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for code status for four residents (Residents #26, #22, #51, and #16) out of the 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 52. A policy and procedure regarding the provisions of basic life support was requested, but not provided. The physician services policy, date 8/2024., shows once a resident is admitted to the facility, orders for the resident's immediate care and needs can by provided by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist. 1. Review of Resident #26's face sheet showed: -readmission on [DATE]; -Diagnoses: Dementia, heart disease, arthritis, fracture of right leg; -Code Status -Do Not Resuscitate (No life saving measures); -Assistance with all activities of daily living. [...]
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed for follow infection control guidelines when they allowed four volunteers #1, #2, #3, and #4 to be around and provide services in the facility for residents before completing any TB skin testing. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility's undated TB (Tuberculosis) skin test., showed: -The purpose of a TB skin test is to determine if a resident or employee has been exposed to tuberculosis. -TB test will be done on all new employee at the time of hire and three weeks later. -The policy does not address TB skin testing for volunteers. Record Review of Volunteer #1., showed: - Hire date 4/24/24 -Completed criminal background checks 5/1/25 -Start date 5/1/25 -No TB skin testing was completed. Record Review of Volunteer #2., showed: [...]
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 13 sampled residents, when they did not care plan the dialysis needs for Resident #106. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility's Care Plan policy, date 8/2024., showed: A comprehensive, person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. 1. Review of Resident #106's face sheet showed and admission date of 1/10/25. Review of the resident's baseline care plan, dated 1/10/25, showed: - The resident was slightly confused; - History of falls prior to admission; - Required assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, toileting, and showers; [...]
  6. D
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident #55) and additionally failed to follow their own discharge planning policy. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility's Discharge Planning Policy, effective 1/11/24, showed, - The facility is committed to ensuring that all residents experience a person-centered, safe, and coordinated discharge process. Discharge planning will prioritize residents' needs, preferences, and post-discharge care requirements while adhering to regulatory standards. -Administrator is to ensure the necessary resources and staff training for effective discharge planning. - The Social Service Designee will: 1) Initiate discharge planning upon admission and update the plan throughout the residents' stay. [...]
  7. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure communication between the facility staff and dialysis (a medical procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to function properly) center followed standards of practice, when staff failed to document an assessment before and after dialysis. This affected one of the 13 sampled residents (Resident #106). The facility census was 52. Review of the facility's policy titled, Peritoneal Dialysis (a treatment for kidney failure that uses the lining of the abdomen to filter blood) (Continuous Ambulatory), revised October 2010, showed: - All dialysis procedures are administered outside of the facility under a contracted dialysis facility. 1. Review of Resident #106's face sheet showed: - admission date: 1/10/25. [...]
June 2, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner, failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated, failed to enter temperatures on the temperature logs and failed to ensure the walk in freezer did not have ice buildup. These all have the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 55. The facility did not provide any policies. Record review of the walk in freezer temperature log showed: - No entries in the morning on 5/1, 5/7, 5/10, 5/13, 5/14, 5/19, 5/20, 5/21, 5/24, 5/25, 5/26, 5/27, 5/28 and no entries in the evening on 5/1, 5/6, 5/21, 5/29. Review of the produce/dessert refrigerator temperature log showed: - No entries in the morning on 5/1, 5/11, 5/15, 5/20, 5/21, 5/24, 5/29 and no entries in the evening on 5/1, 5/5, 5/6, 5/18, 5/21 and 5/29. [...]
  2. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care consistent with the resident rights that include measurable objectives and timeframe to meet the resident's needs. This affected four sampled residents (Residents#4, #23, #29 and #33) The facility census was 55. The facility did not provide a policy regarding care planning. 1. Review of Resident #29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by staff), dated 3/31/23, showed: -The resident makes self understood and understands others. -Score of 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a structured evaluation aimed at evaluating aspects of cognition in elderly patients). The score of 3 indicates severely impaired cognition. [...]
  3. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess three residents (Resident's #4, #29, and #33) for entrapment and did not complete side rail assessments at least yearly. The facility census was 55. Review of the facilty's undated Physical Restraint policy showed: -Purpose: To prevent the resident from injuring himself or others; To improve the resident's mobility and independent functions; To treat the resident's medical symptoms. -Physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. -Equipment includes side rails (bed rails). Procedure: 1: Assess resident's need for restraint use. 2: Obtain informed consent for restraint use. 3. [...]
  4. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made three medication errors out of 26 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.54%. This affected two residents sampled for medication administration (Residents #17 and #28). The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's Medications Policy, dated 5/25/22, showed: - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders; - Prior to administering the medicine the individual checks the label three times to verify: o Right resident; o Right medication; o Right dosage; o Right time o Right route; o Expiration date. 1. Review of Resident #17's physician order sheet (POS), dated June 2023, showed: - Start date: [...]
  5. D
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    F868 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain quarterly quality assessment committee meetings with the required members. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's undated Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy showed: - The Governing Body and QAA Committee of the nursing center develop a culture that involves leadership-seeking input from nursing center staff, residents, their family's and other stakeholders. - The Governing Body is responsible for the development and implementation of the QAPI program. The Governing Body is responsible for: 1. Identifying and prioritizing problems based on performance indicator data. 2. Incorporating resident and staff input that reflects organizational processes, functions, and services provided to residents. 3. [...]

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 6 on January 16, 2025, 5 on June 2, 2023.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. F
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
    K 311 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Ensure that building systems meet requirements determined by risk assessment procedures performed by qualified personnel.
    K 901 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · June 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.713.433.86
Registered nurses0.980.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.193.013.42
Nurse aides2.57
Licensed practical nurses0.15
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)50.7%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover23.1%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.08 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.91 on weekdays and 3.19 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.91 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.710.983.913.19 0.8%0 of 9053
Oct to Dec 20253.561.023.812.92 2.4%0 of 9255
Jul to Sep 20253.841.024.123.14 0.1%0 of 9255
Apr to Jun 20253.910.934.193.21 0.8%0 of 9151
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.018.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.62.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.04.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.417.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.44.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
34.923.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
30.026.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.113.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.72.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.52.31.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LIVINGSTON COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICT.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Livingston County Nursing Home District5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/22/2007
Usda Rural Development5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization01/22/2007
Hughes, DarleneManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/17/2025
Jones, ConnieManaging control - governing bodyIndividual03/17/2016
Rardon, SharonManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/01/2014
Thompson, DebraManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/17/2025
Washburn, CharlesManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/23/2024
Winfrey, RobertManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/22/2007
Jones, ConnieCorporate directorIndividual03/17/2016
Lewis, JodinaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Melte, Harri AnnOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Sensenich, GregoryOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/01/2023
Forvis Mazars LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization03/09/2020
Livingston County Nursing Home DistrictAdp of the SNFOrganization01/22/2007
Midwest Physical Therapy PCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/04/2013
Cady, ScottAdp of the SNFIndividual03/09/2025
Corbin, LugenisAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2021
Lewis, JodinaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Melte, Harri AnnAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Sensenich, GregoryAdp of the SNFIndividual02/01/2013

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2026: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2026: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Morningside Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Morningside Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Morningside Center get at its last inspection?
9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 20, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Morningside Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Morningside Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Morningside Center?
CMS lists 20 owners and managers. Legal business name: LIVINGSTON COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection