What is Mount Olivet Careview Home's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Mount Olivet Careview Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Mount Olivet Careview Home get at its last inspection?

3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.

Does Mount Olivet Careview Home accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Mount Olivet Careview Home?

CMS lists 54 owners and managers. Legal business name: MOUNT OLIVET CAREVIEW HOME.

Mount Olivet Careview Home: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 17 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $55,043 in the last three years; the largest was $55,043, and the latest is dated June 4, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.25 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.33 of those hours.

20.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

109/23

011/23

106/24

307/24

801/25

111/25

302/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

14D

Potential for minimal harm

February 25, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations

D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for 1 of 2 residents (R13) observed during dining.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the manufacturer's recommended sling size was used for 1 of 1 resident (R132) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers.
D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Two medication errors occurred out of 26 opportunities resulting in a 7.69% medication error rate for 1 of 6 residents (R150) observed during medication administration.

November 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.

F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to identify the indication for the administration of narcotic medications and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted/offered and documented prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) narcotic medications for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for pain.

January 16, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations

E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to use proper infection control practices to prevent and/or mitigate the risk of a potential infection outbreak for 3 of 12 residents (R42, R57, R118) observed for respiratory precautions, and 1 of 4 residents (R138) observed for enhanced barrier precautions.
D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure facial hair was removed for 1 of 1 resident (R14) reviewed for dignity related to unwanted facial hair.
D

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and documentation review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess for safety to determine if self-administration of medication was appropriate for 1 of 2 residents (R77) reviewed for self-administration of medication (SAM).
D

Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for 1 of 2 residents (R76) reviewed for food choices.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and resident-specific care plan for 1 of 1 residents (R76) reviewed for urinary tract infections.
D

Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to identify pressure injury, and/or provide preventive care consistent with care planned interventions for residents at risk for pressure injuries for 2 of 5 residents (R28, R45) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement care planned fall interventions for 1 of 7 residents (R34) who had history of repeated falls and remained at risk for falls.
D

Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.

F811 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R112) who had complicated feeding problems received feeding assistance from qualified staff. This had the potential to affect all residents who required feeding assistance.

July 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations

J

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 7, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to report, investigate, and initiate interventions for sexual abuse resulting in subsequent sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1). R1 was sexually abused by R2 on 7/6/24, and again on 7/10/24. The immediate jeopardy began on 7/6/24 when RN-A failed to report an allegation R2 had touched R1 between her legs over her clothing and was identified on 7/15/24. The director of nursing, assistant director of nursing, associate administrator, and nurse manager were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 4:45 p.m. on 7/15/24. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 7/16/24, but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of D - isolated which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. Findings Include: [...]
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 7, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported immediately, within 2 hours, to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for allegations of abuse.
D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 7, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were investigated for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for allegations of abuse.

June 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

E

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide services in accordance with the resident's written plan of care for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R3, R4, R5) who were dependent upon care of others to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). In addition, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident's current needs for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for activities of daily living.

November 2, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

September 7, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R3). One of which was readmitted after a hospital stay (R2) and one resident (R3) who had multiple areas of bruising.

Fire safety inspections

15 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 25, 2026, 5 on January 16, 2025, 7 on November 2, 2023.

Every fire safety citation15 citations

E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.

K 914 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.

K 225 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure proper storage of liquid oxygen.

K 930 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.

K 225 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.

K 291 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · November 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
June 4, 2024	Fine	$55,043

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Minnesota	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.25	4.19	3.86
Registered nurses	1.33	1.06	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.90	3.71	3.42
Nurse aides	3.40
Licensed practical nurses	0.52
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	20.9%	42.2%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	28.3%	38.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 3.67 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.39 on weekdays and 4.90 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.28 in April to June 2025 to 5.25 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.25	1.33	5.39	4.90	0.0%	0 of 90	145
Oct to Dec 2025	5.29	1.34	5.44	4.93	0.3%	0 of 92	146
Jul to Sep 2025	5.35	1.22	5.49	5.01	0.0%	0 of 92	147
Apr to Jun 2025	5.28	1.29	5.42	4.93	0.0%	0 of 91	148
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026	4.19	1.05	4.38	3.73	5.2%	0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$22.44	$19.39 to $23.72	29,120
LPNs and LVNs	$30.65	$28.83 to $34.26	12,840
Registered nurses	$48.80	$42.76 to $55.17	70,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Minnesota	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	24.7	18.2	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.1	1.9	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.9	2.6	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.2	4.0	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.7	1.9	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	27.2	20.5	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.5	5.2	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	18.5	17.1	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	27.8	23.5	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	7.3	14.8	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.7	1.6	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.3	1.9	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mount Olivet Careview Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

59.6% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 240 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 250 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 149 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

54.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 139 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.6% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 160 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.9% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 159 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

98.7% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MOUNT OLIVET CAREVIEW HOME.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Mount Olivet Careview Home	Direct ownership interest	Organization	01/01/1966
Beese, Mark	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/09/2022
Bent, Christine	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/09/2022
Carlson, David	Managing control - governing body	Individual	05/01/2011
Cartwright, Eileen	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/01/2017
Gray, Kimberly	Managing control - governing body	Individual	08/14/2024
Halva, Kurt	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/09/2022
Jarcho, Ruth	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/01/2017
Kuehn, John	Managing control - governing body	Individual	03/01/2002
Lose, David	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/09/2022
Macnally, Thomas	Managing control - governing body	Individual	05/15/2025
Olson, Trudy	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/23/2012
Page, Greg	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/01/2017
Stewart, Robert	Managing control - governing body	Individual	08/14/2024
Telleen, William	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/09/2022
Van Winkle, Sarah	Managing control - governing body	Individual	08/16/2023
Vetsch, Gordy	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/09/2022
Youngdahl, Peter	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/01/2017
Beese, Mark	Corporate director	Individual	02/09/2022
Carlson, David	Corporate director	Individual	05/01/2011
Cartwright, Eileen	Corporate director	Individual	02/01/2017
Gray, Kimberly	Corporate director	Individual	08/14/2024
Kuehn, John	Corporate director	Individual	03/01/2002
Lose, David	Corporate director	Individual	02/09/2022
Macnally, Thomas	Corporate director	Individual	05/15/2025
Olson, Trudy	Corporate director	Individual	02/23/2012
Page, Greg	Corporate director	Individual	02/01/2017
Stewart, Robert	Corporate director	Individual	08/14/2024
Telleen, William	Corporate director	Individual	02/09/2022
Van Winkle, Sarah	Corporate director	Individual	08/16/2023
Youngdahl, Peter	Corporate director	Individual	02/01/2017
Bent, Christine	Corporate officer	Individual	02/09/2022
Flack, Sharon	Corporate officer	Individual	07/01/2016
Halva, Kurt	Corporate officer	Individual	02/09/2022
Jarcho, Ruth	Corporate officer	Individual	02/01/2017
Vetsch, Gordy	Corporate officer	Individual	02/09/2022
White, Roger	Corporate officer	Individual	06/01/2026
Mount Olivet Careview Home	Operational/managerial control	Organization	01/23/1958
Fairbairn, Scott	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/01/2024
Flack, Sharon	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/10/2026
Harahan, Tana	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/13/2025
Kubat, Nikki	Operational/managerial control	Individual	02/16/2016
McChesney, Julie	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/02/2020
McLean, Erick	Operational/managerial control	Individual	11/14/2023
Myslivecek, Griffin	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/06/2025
Optiz, Heidi	Operational/managerial control	Individual	10/01/2023
Peterson, Dale	Operational/managerial control	Individual	03/01/2022
Schwab, Desiree	Operational/managerial control	Individual	10/31/2022
Turner, Cairo	Operational/managerial control	Individual	12/05/2023
White, Adam	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/06/2025
White, Roger	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/01/2026
Mount Olivet Careview Home	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/01/1966
Fairbairn, Scott	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/10/2025
White, Roger	Adp of the SNF	Individual	06/09/2026

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2024: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Mount Olivet Home
Minneapolis, 0 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Grand Avenue Rest Home
Minneapolis, 1.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 48 citations
Edenbrook of Edina
Minneapolis, 1.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Lakehouse Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
Minneapolis, 2.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 80 citations
Aurora on France
Edina, 2.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
The Villas at Richfield
Richfield, 2.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 36 citations
Birchwood Care Home
Minneapolis, 3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Redeemer Health Care Center
Minneapolis, 3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 25 citations

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Minnesota Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care, 1-800-657-3591. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Mount Olivet Careview Home's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Mount Olivet Careview Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Mount Olivet Careview Home get at its last inspection?: 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Mount Olivet Careview Home been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $55,043 in the last three years.
Does Mount Olivet Careview Home accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Mount Olivet Careview Home?: CMS lists 54 owners and managers. Legal business name: MOUNT OLIVET CAREVIEW HOME.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.