Find a nursing home

Home / New York / Norwich

Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

88 Calvary Drive, Norwich, NY 13815 · Chenango County · (607) 336-3915

80 certified beds, about 79 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335759 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 1, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 12 health citations since July 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 7 fines totaling $63,215 in the last three years; the largest was $15,591, and the latest is dated December 3, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.53 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.70 of those hours.

58.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).

CMS links it to Personal Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
August 1, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00353879) surveys conducted 7/29/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #39 and #80) reviewed and seven (7) anonymous residents present at the group meeting. Specifically, Resident #39's room and bathroom had a strong odor of urine; Resident #80 had missing clothing items and a wheelchair with a wheel in disrepair; and seven (7) anonymous residents reported they had items missing from laundry.
  2. D
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025-8/1/2025 the facility did not develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #90). Specifically, there was no documented evidence of an ongoing discharge plan for Resident #1 and Resident #90.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to include services provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 did not have a care plan for managing anticoagulant therapy (blood thinner).
  4. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/20225-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 had a significant weight loss, weekly weights were not completed as ordered, the medical providers were not notified of the weight loss and the resident had a functional decline in their eating ability and a referral for an occupational therapy evaluation was not submitted timely.
  5. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was observed with a continuous positive airway pressure machine, and the medical record did not include a physician order or a care plan related to the use of the continuous positive airway pressure machine.
  6. D
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the provision of food and drink was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 2 meal trays tested. Specifically, food was not served at palatable and safe temperatures.
December 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00361060), the facility failed to establish mechanisms for documenting and communicating the resident's choice regarding Advance Directives to the staff responsible for the resident's care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 updated their Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment to reflect a change from wanting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (attempt to restart the heart) to do not resuscitate (allow natural death). The medical record and code status indicators were not revised to reflect the resident's Advance Directives wishes and the facility continued with cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders. [...]
January 9, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/3/2024-1/9/2024, the facility did not ensure storage and preparation of food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 3 of 3 kitchens (the main kitchen and Units 2 and 3 kitchenettes) reviewed. Specifically, the main kitchen had expired sanitizer strips for the three-bay sink; fruit flies were observed in the main kitchen and the Unit 2 and Unit 3 kitchenettes; the ice machines in the Unit 2 and 3 kitchenettes were damaged; the Unit 3 kitchenette had an undated open loaf of bread; and the Unit 2 kitchenette walls and ceiling were unclean.
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00325041) surveys conducted 1/3/2024-1/9/2024, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated to prevent further potential abuse for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #62 and #235) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #235 reported they were slapped in the face by Resident #62, the incident was not thoroughly investigated and was not reported to the New York State Department of Health as required.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00327028) surveys conducted 1/3/2024-1/9/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #232) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #232 was care planned for a wander alert device to be worn at all times, the device was removed when the resident was sent to the hospital, the device was not reapplied when they returned to the facility, and the resident was not supervised until the device was replaced. Subsequently, Resident #232 was observed alone in a non-residential area.
  4. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/3/2024 -1/9/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who required dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #335) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #335 received hemodialysis (a process of purifying blood when the kidneys do not work properly) treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on-going assessment and oversight before and after dialysis treatments including assessment of the dialysis access site; did not have a comprehensive care plan that addressed dialysis; and there was not consistent ongoing communication and collaboration between the facility and the dialysis center.
July 9, 2021Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/6/21-7/9/21, the facility did not ensure it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 6 residents (Residents # 4, 15, 45 and 78) observed during medication administration. Specifically, licensed practical nurse (LPN) #10 was observed not performing hand hygiene between consecutive medication administrations for Residents #4, 15, 78 and 79. Findings Include: The facility policy Administration of Medication updated 3/1/20 documented that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. [...]

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 9, 2021.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · July 9, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · July 9, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
December 3, 2024Fine $15,591
February 20, 2024Fine $4,938
February 12, 2024Fine $4,938
January 22, 2024Fine $14,814
January 8, 2024Fine $4,938
January 2, 2024Fine $4,587
December 11, 2023Fine $13,409

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.533.633.86
Registered nurses0.700.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.903.183.42
Nurse aides1.97
Licensed practical nurses0.86
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)58.4%40.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover45.0%39.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.78 on weekdays and 2.90 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.46 in April to June 2025 to 3.53 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.530.703.782.90 2.2%0 of 9079
Oct to Dec 20253.630.683.912.94 2.1%0 of 9278
Jul to Sep 20253.610.783.952.76 2.1%0 of 9279
Apr to Jun 20253.460.613.742.78 2.0%0 of 9178
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
New York, Jan to Mar 20263.550.683.723.139.8%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.714.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.60.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.81.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.63.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.21.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.612.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.46.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.113.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.820.623.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.89.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.21.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.71.41.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: NORWICH OPERATING CO LLC. CMS links this home to Personal Healthcare Management, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Barth, Alexander5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual15%06/24/2009
Zagelbaum, Ephraim5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual49%01/01/2011
Zagelbaum, Yechiel5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual21%06/24/2009
Barth, AlexanderCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2011
Amidon, JeffreyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Revoir, EdithOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2017
Norwich Realty Associates LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/25/2025
Amidon, JeffreyAdp of the SNFIndividual03/25/2025
Barth, AlexanderAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2011
Revoir, EdithAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.90 hours per resident per day, below the New York average of 3.18.

Other nursing homes nearby

New York contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 1, 2025. The New York average is 8.1.
Has Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 7 fines totaling $63,215 in the last three years.
Does Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center?
CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Personal Healthcare Management. Legal business name: NORWICH OPERATING CO LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection