Find a nursing home

Home / Kansas / Baxter Springs

Quaker Hill Manor

8675 Se 72nd Terrace, Baxter Springs, KS 66713 · Cherokee County · (620) 848-3797

53 certified beds, about 40 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175470 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 3, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 20 health citations since June 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.78 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.

42.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).

CMS links it to Americare Senior Living, an affiliated group of 23 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
0E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
2C
December 3, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility, and to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria in one of one kitchen.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents with 12 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to show respect and dignity to one Resident (R)30, when the resident sat with her bare legs, including her upper thighs, exposed.
  3. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents; the sample included 12 residents including two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)15 and R1, and/or their representative, a written notification explaining the purpose of the discharge.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 1's Care Plan with the interventions to address a diagnosis of cancer or the cancerous lesions. Findings Included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses of lung cancer, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R1's 10/09/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded R1 had dressing treatments. R1 had a diagnosis of cancer. [...]
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents; there were 12 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care for Resident (R)30, who was dependent on staff for oral hygiene.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 47 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for non-pressure skin issues, and one resident reviewed for constipation. Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to monitor skin issues for Resident (R)30 and failed to administer as needed (PRN) medication and assess for constipation for R19.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents; the sample included 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident(R) 4's call light remained in reach to prevent falls for R4. The facility further failed to ensure R45 had wheelchair pedals when staff propelled him in the wheelchair.
  8. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding blood pressure monitoring for Resident (R) 5's blood pressure medication when staff administered the medication despite R5's blood pressure being lower than the ordered parameters.
  9. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use adequate hand hygiene when caring for residents.
  10. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to display posted staffing information which contained the required data including the actual nursing hours worked for the 47 residents who resided in the facility.
  11. C
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe, homelike environment in all areas of the facility including those used by visitors and staff and the floor in one of one kitchen. This deficient practice created a risk for impaired safety and cleanliness.
February 15, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria.
  2. F
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe resident reported a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 44 residents with 14 residents selected for review which included three residents reviewed for choices. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing opportunities, per the residents' preferences, for two Residents (R)30 and R36, of the three residents reviewed for choices.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 44 residents with 14 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include one Resident (R)26's use of Estrace (a female hormone) for inappropriate sexual behaviors.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 44 residents with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care for one dependent Resident (R)35.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 44 residents with 14 residents selected for review which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify the diagnoses for a medication for one Resident (R)26 of the five residents reviewed for medications.
June 16, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 37 residents with 13 selected for review, including two residents reviewed for self-determination/choices. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to honor one of the two residents bathing preferences, Resident (R)17, who requested baths on Saturdays so she was ready for church on Sundays.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 37 residents with 13 selected for review. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for two sampled residents, Resident (R)17 with bathing preferences/choices and R21 with interventions post falls to prevent further fall occurrences.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2022
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 37 residents with 13 selected for review including three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow planned fall interventions and implement a new and/or appropriate intervention for one of the two residents, Resident (R)21, to prevent occurrence of additional falls for this resident with multiple falls.

Fire safety inspections

20 fire safety citations on file: 9 on December 3, 2025, 4 on February 15, 2024, 7 on June 16, 2022.

Every fire safety citation20 citations
  1. F
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · December 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. F
    Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
    K 346 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. F
    Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
    K 354 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. F
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeKansasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.784.073.86
Registered nurses0.780.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.363.603.42
Nurse aides2.57
Licensed practical nurses0.43
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)42.9%48.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover63.6%42.0%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.95 on weekdays and 3.36 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.65 in April to June 2025 to 3.78 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.780.783.953.36 0.0%0 of 9040
Oct to Dec 20253.550.673.723.11 0.0%0 of 9247
Jul to Sep 20253.720.713.913.22 0.0%0 of 9246
Apr to Jun 20253.650.483.773.35 0.0%0 of 9144
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Kansas, Jan to Mar 20264.010.674.193.564.8%0.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Kansas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Kansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.27$17.41 to $21.2424,610
LPNs and LVNs$29.69$27.05 to $33.407,530
Registered nurses$38.14$35.24 to $45.5333,800
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Quaker Hill Manor. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeKansasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.917.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.02.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.54.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.816.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.94.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.318.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
31.922.423.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.311.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.01.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.82.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Quaker Hill Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (64.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

64.9% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

75.7% this home

Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.6% this home

Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: QUAKER HILL NURSING, LLC. CMS links this home to Americare Senior Living, a group of 23 nursing homes averaging 3.7 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
R H Montgomery Properties, Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2003
Montgomery, Anna5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual50%01/01/2013
Montgomery, Richard5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual50%01/01/2003
Bailey, AmyW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/01/2019
Reiker, JamesCorporate officerIndividual04/02/2002
Schade, KyleCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2021
Americare Systems, Inc.Operational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2001
Reiker, JamesOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2000

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 3, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 3, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 3, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 3, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.36 hours per resident per day, below the Kansas average of 3.60.

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Quaker Hill Manor's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Quaker Hill Manor 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Quaker Hill Manor get at its last inspection?
11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 3, 2025. The Kansas average is 9.5.
Has Quaker Hill Manor been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Quaker Hill Manor accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Quaker Hill Manor?
CMS lists 8 owners and managers, and links the home to Americare Senior Living. Legal business name: QUAKER HILL NURSING, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection