Home / Washington / Omak
Regency Omak
901 Shumway Rd, Omak, WA 98841 · Okanogan County · (509) 846-7700
56 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505303 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 24, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 19 health citations since June 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.04 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.87 of those hours.
39.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Washington average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Regency Pacific Management, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
January 24, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed when indicated during the lunch meal service. The facility further failed to ensure the microwave and ice machine were clean and dishwasher temperatures were maintained at the appropriate temperatures. These failures placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses and food served from unsanitary conditions.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's neurological status (an evaluation completed on a person's alertness, muscle strength, coordination, ability to feel and reflexes) after multiple unwitnessed falls occurred for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 34) reviewed for falls. This failure placed the residents at risk for falls.
March 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions related to monitoring during a viral infection for 2 of 3 residents (1 and 2) whose care plans were reviewed. This failure put the residents at risk for worsening of their condition and unmet care needs.
October 11, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2, 26, and 14), reviewed for unnecessary medications, were informed of the potential risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications (medications that can affect the mind, emotions, and behaviors). This failure placed the residents and/or their representative at risk of not being fully informed of the potential risks and benefits of taking the medications.
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify what information was conveyed to the hospital at the time of transfer for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 34) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure placed the resident at risk for a disruptive and ineffective transition from the facility to the hospital setting.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it completed a notice of bed hold for 1 of 2 (Resident 34) sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 26), reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [an assessment completed prior to admission into a skilled nursing facility to determine whether a resident with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness needed specialized mental health services] was completed accurately and if indicated, a referral for additional screening had been made.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate indication for the use of an antidepressant for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk to receive unnecessary medications and/or experience adverse side effects.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to destroy a deceased resident's controlled medication timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 1 of 1 medication storage rooms. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications were stored in a permanently affixed, locked storage compartment in the medication refrigerator. These failures placed the facility at risk for potential diversion or misappropriation of controlled medications.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure vaccine consents, medication reviews, and advance directives records were complete and accurate for 3 of the 19 sampled residents (2, 14, 20 and 26) whose records were reviewed. Failure to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate, placed residents at risk of not having their needs met.
August 6, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a system to evaluate agency/contracted staff competencies in skills and techniques to ensure staff provided necessary care and respond to each resident's individualized needs for 1 of 4 sampled staff (Staff I), reviewed for nursing services. This failure resulted in ineffective communication with Resident 1 that made them feel uncomfortable, placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and diminished quality of life.
June 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to refuse care for 1 of 3 residents (1) investigated for abuse. two staff members insisted that a resident have a shower, despite their initial refusal. This failure placed the resident at risk for feelings of disrespect and decreased self-worth.
February 27, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of potential abuse were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency as required, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure placed the resident at risk for abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into allegations of abuse in a timely manner, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). Failure to recognize allegations as possible abuse and failure to immediately investigate allegations, placed the resident at risk for diminished quality of life, and continued possible abuse.
June 1, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions, consistently monitor pressure ulcers, and notify appropriate disciplines once pressure ulcers were identified for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 3, 7, and 29), reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Actual harm occurred for Resident 3, when facility staff did not have preventive protective boots(cushioned devices placed on the feet to protect against pressure) implemented timely, the resident lost a significant amount of weight, developed an additional pressure injury, and the Registered Dietician (RD) was not notified of the resident's wounds. This failure placed the other residents at risk of harm from further deterioration of their skin conditions, and a decreased quality of life.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wrote<Resident 17> Per the 03/02/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 17 admitted to the facility with obstructive sleep apnea (a problem in which your breathing pauses during sleep), hypoxemia (a low level of oxygen in the blood), shortness of breath, and a disorder of diaphragm (the thin muscle below the lungs and heart), and required oxygen due to those conditions. Review of the physician orders showed on 12/18/2020, the resident had been prescribed oxygen to be used continuously due to the diagnoses listed. The respiratory care plan showed the licensed nursing staff were instructed on 09/23/2019 to change the oxygen tubing weekly. There was no direction on cleaning the concentrator, or a physician's order to do so. On 05/23/2023 at 9:25 AM, Resident 17 was observed wearing oxygen with a date on the tubing of 05/16/2023. [...]
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident for behavioral health services when needed for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 12), reviewed for mood and behavior. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening depression and a decreased quality of life.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 1 of 1 medication storage rooms. The facility further failed to ensure narcotics were locked in a permanently affixed narcotic container. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication, and placed the facility at risk for potential diversion or misappropriation of narcotic medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Residents 29, 191), reviewed for use and care of a urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag), received appropriate care and services to minimize the risk of associated urinary infections. In addition, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and glove changes were performed when indicated in the kitchen by one of three kitchen staff (Staff I), observed during tray line service. These failures placed the residents at risk for infection.
Fire safety inspections
19 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 24, 2026, 8 on October 11, 2024, 9 on June 1, 2023.
Every fire safety citation19 citations
- F Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
- D Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Washington | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.04 | 4.36 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.47 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.70 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.47 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.1% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 45.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.26 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.70 in April to June 2025 to 4.04 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.04 | 0.87 | 4.26 | 3.47 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 42 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.70 | 0.84 | 3.94 | 3.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.72 | 0.75 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 46 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.70 | 0.69 | 3.98 | 2.99 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 46 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Washington, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.21 | 0.90 | 4.44 | 3.66 | 3.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Washington | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.2 | 14.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.1 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.6 | 15.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.2 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.4 | 13.4 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: REGENCY OMAK LLC. CMS links this home to Regency Pacific Management, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency Pacific Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2014 | |
| Beddoe, Marvin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 24, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on October 11, 2024: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 3, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 11, 2024: "Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.47 hours per resident per day, below the Washington average of 3.80.
Other nursing homes nearby
- North Valley Hospital Tonasket, 19.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Washington contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Washington DSHS Aging and Long-Term Support Administration, Residential Care Services, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Washington State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-562-6028. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Regency Omak's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Regency Omak 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Regency Omak get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 24, 2026. The Washington average is 15.8.
- Has Regency Omak been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Regency Omak accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Regency Omak?
- CMS lists 2 owners and managers, and links the home to Regency Pacific Management. Legal business name: REGENCY OMAK LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.