206 Walls Dr, Cleburne, TX 76033 · Johnson County · (817) 645-0668
134 certified beds, about 95 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676197 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 11, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 20 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.67 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.63 of those hours.
51.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Dallas County Hospital District, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident's needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #49's call light was within reach on 12/09/25. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's MDS assessment dated [DATE] was accurately coded for the use and indication of high-risk medications, specifically an antiplatelet medication. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care, treatment, and services due to inaccurate assessments. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Residents #5) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's nutritional status and needs, including orders for a puree diet and orders for thickened liquids, were addressed in the comprehensive care plan. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care or receiving incorrect care and services related to their identified needs to maintain or reach their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored properly for 1 of 1 medication storage room reviewed for drug storage. The facility failed to ensure expired lab supplies and needles used for biologicals were removed from the medication storage room. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate diagnoses from defective labs, ineffective treatments and unnecessary infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor for pureed diets for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure DS B refrained from adding water to spaghetti pureed meals during lunch service on 12/9/2025. This failure could place residents who received a puree diet at risk for diminished or altered nutritional status and potential weight loss. Observation on 12/9/2023 at 11:14 AM revealed DS B poured water into the spaghetti noodles and sauce to assist in achieving the proper puree consistency. Observation on 12/9/2025 at 11:15 AM revealed DS A correcting DS B in her use of water for puree meals and instructed DS B to use broth. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify residents on how to file a grievance in an anonymous manner, and the contact information of the Grievance Official for 4 confidential residents out of 4 residents interviewed for grievances. 1. The facility failed to notify Residents or their representatives either individually or through prominent postings throughout the facility on how to file a grievance or complaint in an anonymous manner. 2. The facility failed to communicate to the residents who the facility identified as the Grievance Official. These failures could affect resident's ability to file a grievance without the fear of discrimination, reprisal, retribution, and their right to request a written decision regarding the resolution of their grievance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received treatment and services for 1 of 5 residents (Resident's #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. 1. The facility failed to have a physician's order for Resident #2's urinary catheter. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3's urinary catheter bags were inside a privacy cover while inside and outside of their rooms. This deficient practice could affect any resident with an indwelling urinary catheter and place them at risk of increased UTI's, discomfort, and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) of 7 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to care plan the use of Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4's urinary catheters. This failure placed residents that had urinary catheters at risk of not having their need for assistance met and increased susceptibility to UTI's.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review for one (Resident # 21) of eight residents reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to refer Resident #21 for a PASRR level II evaluation to the State-designated authority. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized PASRR services which would enhance their highest level of functioning and could contribute to residents decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames that met the residents clinical and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #22) out of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #19's comprehensive care plan included her diagnosis of pain. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #22's Care Plan was updated to reflect that he no longer had an indwelling catheter. This failure could place residents at risk of having received inadequate interventions not individualized to their care needs and diagnoses. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was not misdiagnosed with schizoaffective disorder. This failure could place residents at a risk of being misdiagnosed and receiving incorrect treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #62 and Resident #188) of 8 residents observed for infection control. 1. LVN A failed to clean the blood pressure cuff after using it on Resident #188 who was on enhanced barrier precautions. LVN A used the same blood pressure cuff on Resident #62. 2. The facility failed to post signage on Resident #188's that he was on enhanced barrier precautions. The failures could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. 1. There were 17 expired jello cups and an opened carton of expired cranberry juice stored in the reach-in refrigerator. 2. There was a tray of jello that spilled on top of a box of cooked ham stored in the walk-in refrigerator. 3. There were 24 cans of expired cranberry juice stored in the pantry. 4. There was a box of bananas that was not stored in a dry food storage area. 5. There were two small buckets filled with chemicals stored next to a box of bananas. These failures could place residents who received meals, snacks, and/or beverages from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for 5 of 10 residents (Residents #273, #270, #271, #34 and #272) reviewed for medical record confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure confidential medical information was kept private by leaving the computer screen open on the medication cart and leaving the 24-hour report (a report with resident names, diagnoses, and vital signs) on top of the cart and exposed where passersby could read it. This failure could place Residents at risk for breach of confidential information possibly impairing the dignity of the resident by others having pertinent medical information regarding residents' health status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure Each resident will have a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his or her preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 2 of 2 residents reviewed. B) Resident #24's comprehensive care plan did not address the resident's right-hand contracture, and call lights assistance C) Resident #35's comprehensive care plan did not address the resident receiving hospice services. This failure could place Residents at risk by failing to meet the resident's preferences, choices, and goals during their stay at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to them for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #371 and #12) reviewed for medication administration and 1 of 4 medication carts (the 200 Hall Nurses Medication Cart) reviewed for medication storage. A) The facility failed to ensure over-the-counter medications for Residents #371 and #12 were stored in locked compartments. B) The facility failed to ensure the medication cart was locked when it was left unattended in the common area of the 200-hallway. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 16 (#273, #272, and #24) Residents reviewed for infection control practices. A. RN D placed his ungloved fingers into medication cups prior to administration for Resident's #273 and #272. B. CNA F failed to use proper urinary catheter care techniques when proving perineal hygiene for Resident #24. These failures had the potential to affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting, spreading, and/or exposing them to bacterial or viral infections that could lead to the spread of communicable diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for call lights in that: Resident #24's call light was not within reach. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to not admit any new residents with a mental disorder unless the State mental health authority has determined based on an independent physical and mental evaluation performed by a person or entity other than the State mental health authority, prior to admission that because of the physical and mental condition of the individual, the individual requires the level of services provided by a nursing facility for (Resident #38) of one of four resident reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38 PASARR Level One screening accurately reflected their diagnoses of mental illness. This failure could affect residents with mental illness placing them at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two residents (Residents #3 and #125) reviewed for respiratory care. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen concentrator filter was clean and her CPAP and nebulizer masks and tubing were covered and dated. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #125's oxygen concentrator filter was clean and her oxygen tubing were dated. This failure could place all residents who use respiratory equipment at risk for respiratory infections.
9 fire safety citations on file: 5 on September 19, 2024, 4 on July 27, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.67 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.17 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.02 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.6% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.5% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 3.17 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.67 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.63 | 3.88 | 3.17 | 6.4% | 0 of 90 | 95 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.77 | 0.55 | 3.88 | 3.47 | 6.3% | 0 of 92 | 100 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.35 | 0.52 | 3.52 | 2.92 | 4.3% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.43 | 3.79 | 3.27 | 4.8% | 0 of 91 | 93 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Ridgeview Village (CNA Program) on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.3 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ridgeview Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
11.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 132 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 101 eligible stays.
48.8% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 82 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 122 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 122 residents counted.
95.7% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Dallas County Hospital District, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas County Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/31/2017 |
| Castaneda, Edmundo | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/2022 | |
| Pmg Opco - Cleburne, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2026 | |
| Bauder, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Kakish, Eyad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Whitehead, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2026 | |
| Bauder Family Investments, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2026 | |
| Boulware St. James LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2026 | |
| Pmg Realco - Cleburne LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2026 | |
| Steven Boulware Family Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2026 | |
| Bauder, Kelly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Bauder, Madison | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Bauder, Parker | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Bauder, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Boulware, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Boulware, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Kakish, Eyad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Walker, Katie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 | |
| Whitehead, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.