Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
3550 Northfield Road, Shaker Heights, OH 44122 · Cuyahoga County · (216) 752-5600
50 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366021 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 17, 2024, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 18 health citations since May 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $25,495 in the last three years; the largest was $25,495, and the latest is dated July 16, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.18 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.88 of those hours.
40.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Lionstone Care, an affiliated group of 24 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
July 16, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on closed medical record review, interviews, local police report review, hospital record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident, with altered mental status and a history of wandering behaviors, from leaving the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injury, and/or death when on 05/26/26 at approximately 9:35 P.M., Resident #48 left the facility without staff knowledge and was later found by the local police approximately five miles away. This affected one resident (#48) of three residents reviewed for elopement. [...]
May 1, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- F Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply of washcloths and towels were available for resident care needs. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 46.
October 17, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of five percent (%) or less. Five medication errors out of 27 observed opportunities for error, created a medication error rate of 18.5%. This affected two of three residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #5 and #4). The total census was 48.
March 6, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #47. This affected one resident (#47) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/07/23 and diagnoses including acute pulmonary edema, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension, depression, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively impaired and did not reject care. Resident #47 required substantial/partial assistance to sit to stand. Resident #47 could wheel 50 feet in her wheelchair with two turns with supervision or touching assistance. [...]
February 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #49 did not leave the facility without staff knowledge and did not ensure a safe discharge. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 48.
May 2, 2022Standard inspection · 11 citations
- F Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters and surrounding areas were maintained and free from trash and debris. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents currently residing in the facility.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, record review, review of facility infection control policies and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website the facility failed to implement infection control procedures for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This had the potential to affect all 42 residents currently residing in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure tuberculosis (TB) testing was completed as required. This affected two (Residents #30 and #38) of five residents reviewed for TB testing.
- E Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of resident accounts the facility failed to notify residents who receive Medicaid benefits when the amount in their account reached $200.00 less than the SSI (supplemental security income) resource limit for one person. This affected five (Residents #9, #17, #33, #36 and #91) of six residents whose accounts were reviewed of nine resident accounts the facility managed.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure serving sizes for vegetables were provided according to the menu. This had the potential to affect all residents except Residents #21, #24, #25, #139, and #190, who received nothing by mouth. The facility also failed to ensure serving sizes for the mechanical soft beef was served according to the menu. This had the potential to affect nine residents (#7, #10, #12, #18, #22, #29, #34, #189, and #239) who received a mechanical soft or ground diet. The facility census was 42.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumonia vaccinations were completed as required. This affected four (Residents #30, #40, #191, and #192) of five residents (#30, #38, #40, #191, and #192) reviewed for influenza and pneumonia immunizations. The facility census was 42.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents' signed advance directive forms were contained in their medical record. This affected two (Residents #189 and #191) of two residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 42.
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to identify a reason for an immediate discharge. This affected one (Resident #38) of three residents (#38, #40, and #192) reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 42.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of a discharge. This affected one (Resident #38) of three residents (#38, #40, and #192) reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 42.
- D Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was oriented and prepared for discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #38) of three residents (#38, #40, and #192) reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 42.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for Resident #7's risk for skin breakdown or develop an individualized care plan for Resident #9's refusal of assessed contracture prevention devices and nail care. This affected two (Residents #7 and #9) of 20 residents whose care plans were reviewed (#2, #11, #15, #16, #22, #24, #25, #26, #29, #30, #31, #32, #38, #40, #139, #189, #191 and #192). The facility census was 42.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered by the physician to ensure accurate assessment and treatment by the dietitian for a resident identified at nutritional risk. This affected one (Resident #24) out of three residents reviewed for nutritional related concerns. The facility census was 42.
May 22, 2019Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent). There were two medication errors of 30 medication administration opportunities resulting in a 6.66% medication error rate. This affected one resident (Resident #38) of six residents observed for medication administration.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation was completed for Resident #8 and Resident #3. This affected two residents (Resident #8 and Resident #3) of 26 residents whose records were reviewed. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, atrial fibrillation, and high blood pressure. Review of the Medicare 14 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had been admitted with two pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #8's skin grid notes dated 05/16/19 revealed the resident had a Stage III (a full thickness wound with full thickness tissue loss. [...]
Fire safety inspections
17 fire safety citations on file: 6 on October 17, 2024, 8 on May 2, 2022, 3 on May 22, 2019.
Every fire safety citation17 citations
- F Use approved construction type or materials.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- F Use approved construction type or materials.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 16, 2026 | Fine | $25,495 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.18 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.88 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.52 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.8% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 18.2% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.33 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.30 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.34 in April to June 2025 to 3.18 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.18 | 0.88 | 3.30 | 2.88 | 5.0% | 0 of 90 | 45 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.28 | 0.97 | 3.42 | 2.94 | 3.6% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.21 | 0.85 | 3.36 | 2.85 | 9.8% | 0 of 92 | 48 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.34 | 0.80 | 3.53 | 2.88 | 2.3% | 0 of 91 | 47 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Ohio
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.6 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.0 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
Short-term rehab results
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SHAKER GARDENS OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Lionstone Care, a group of 24 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kazarnovsky, Solomon | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 02/12/2018 |
| Stein, Abba | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 02/12/2018 |
| Cusner, Adam | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2025 | |
| Degyansky, Jeffrey | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Goldish, Eliezer | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Cusner, Adam | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/27/2025 | |
| Degyansky, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Goldish, Eliezer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Kazarnovsky, Solomon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/16/2018 | |
| Stein, Abba | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/16/2018 | |
| Cusner, Adam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/27/2025 | |
| Degyansky, Jeffrey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Goldish, Eliezer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Kazarnovsky, Solomon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/16/2018 | |
| Stein, Abba | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/16/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 2, 2022: "Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 17, 2024: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 2, 2022: "Dispose of garbage and refuse properly."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.88 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Harvard Gardens Rehabilitation & Care Center Cleveland, 1.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 74 citations
- Daughters of Miriam Center for Nursing & Rehabilit Beachwood, 1.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- Beachwood Pointe Care Center Beachwood, 1.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Avenue Care and Rehabilitation Center, the Warrensville Heights, 1.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Suburban Healthcare and Rehabilitation North Randall, 1.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 73 citations
- Phoenix of Maple Heights Maple Heights, 3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC Beachwood, 3.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 62 citations
- Cedarwood Plaza Cleveland Heights, 3.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on October 17, 2024. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $25,495 in the last three years.
- Does Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Lionstone Care. Legal business name: SHAKER GARDENS OPCO LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.