Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Marble Hill

Stonebridge Marble Hill

702 Highway 34 West, Marble Hill, MO 63764 · Bollinger County · (573) 238-2614

98 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265553 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 20 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.31 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.

31.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to Stonebridge Senior Living, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
18D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 8, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained and documented for the use of psychotropic (a medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications for three residents (Residents #8, #10, and #61) out of six sampled residents. This failure prevented the resident and/or their representative from knowing the risks and the benefits of using psychotropic medications. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised October 2017, showed: - Psychotropic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review; [...]
  2. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic (medications that affect how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behaviors) medications for two residents (Residents #7 and #10) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated October 2017, showed: - Psychotropic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review; - The physician shall respond appropriately by changing or stopping problematic doses or medications or clearly documenting why the benefits of the medication outweigh the risks or suspected or confirmed adverse consequences. 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record showed: [...]
  3. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required written notice and documentation related to discharge and bed hold policy requirements, including the required daily bed hold rate for four residents (Residents #1, #3, #13, and #70) out of four sampled residents. The facility also failed to complete a recapitulation of stay upon discharge to home for one resident (Resident #72) out of two closed records reviewed. The facility census was 71. Review of facility policy titled, Bed Holds, dated March 2022, showed: - Upon admission and when a resident is transferred for hospitalization or for therapeutic leave, the facility will provide information regarding the bed hold policy to the resident or representative in a written format that is understood by the resident or the representative; [...]
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for six residents (Residents #5, #7, #19, #31, #41 and #61) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 71. Review of facility policy titled, Bath, Shower/Tub, dated February 2018, showed: - Staff to document the following: the date and time the shower or bath was performed; all assessment data obtained during the shower or bath; how the resident tolerated the shower or bath; and if the resident refused the shower or bath, the reason why, and the intervention taken. 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record showed: - admission date of 12/15/23; [...]
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use proper infection control techniques during wound care for two residents (Resident #7 and #14) out of three sampled residents and during blood glucose (blood sugar) test for four residents (Residents #3, #61, #66, and #75) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, not dated, showed: - All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors; - The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to putting on gloves, and immediately after removing gloves; - Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed: between resident contacts; [...]
  6. D
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year and failed to provide the required competency of Abuse Prevention and Dementia Care (care of a resident with an impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). This affected one Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) (CNA B) out of two sampled CNAs. The facility's census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled, Required Training and Continuing Education of Nurse Aides, dated September 2022, showed:- The facility will provide at least 12 hours of in-service training annually, based on the employment date, not the calendar year;- Minimum training will include: dementia management and care of the cognitively impaired, abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention. [...]
December 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the resident's care plan, dated 8/30/24, to ensure staff utilized safe transfer techniques for one resident (Resident #1) when staff failed to transfer the resident via a mechanical lift out of one sampled resident. The resident sustained a hematoma (a collection of blood that pools outside of a blood vessel in an organ, tissue, or body space) to the chest area. The facility census was 72. The Administration was notified on 12/11/24 of the Past Non-Compliance citation. On , 12/06/24 and 12/09/24, the facility staff took appropriate corrective actions as confirmed by survey staff during the onsite visit. The facility started an investigation, and assessed Resident #1. The facility started an in-service that covered the use of care plans, policy and procedure for transfers, and proper use of a gait belt and Hoyer lift. [...]
October 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    F626 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one resident (Resident #1) to return to the facility after being sent out to the hospital for an evaluation. The facility census was 76 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Holds, dated March 2022, showed: - When emergency transfers are necessary, the facility will provide the resident or representative with information concerning our bed-hold policy within 24 hours of such transfer; - If the facility determines that a resident who was transferred cannot return to the facility, the facility will comply with the facility's Discharge Policy. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfers and Discharges (Including Against Medical Advice (AMA), dated September 2022, showed: - If a Notice of Discharge is given the facility will send a copy of transfer or discharge notice to the Ombudsman. [...]
September 13, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for transfer, for seven residents (Resident #8, #21, #31, #33, #35, #36, and #55) out of 10 sampled residents. The facility's census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy for transfer/discharge notification. 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record showed: - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; [...]
  2. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for five residents (Resident #21, #31, #33, #36, and #55) out of 10 sampled residents. Facility census was 82. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Holds, dated March 2022, showed: - Upon admission and when a resident is transferred to hospitalization or for therapeutic leave, the facility will provide information regarding the bed-hold policy to the resident or representative in a written format that is understood by the resident or representative; - When emergency transfers are necessary, the facility will provide the resident or representative with information concerning the bed-hold policy within 24 hours of such transfer. 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record showed: [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for two residents (Resident #33 and #35) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 82. Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated October 2017, showed: - The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; - The care planning process will facilitate resident and/or representative involvement, include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing the goals of care; [...]
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an order for and a process in place for accessing, maintaining, and assessing a mediport (medical device put just below skin for access if blood needs drawn or intravenous medications need given) for one resident (Resident #35) out of one sampled resident. The facility did not provide a policy on mediport care/maintenance. 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record showed: - A computed tomography (CT - a medical imaging scan used to obtain detailed internal images of the body) scan report, dated 06/02/22, showed a right-sided mediport catheter; - No order for the mediport; - No orders and/or protocols to access and maintain the mediport; - No documentation for assessments of the mediport. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent (%) or less. There were six errors out of 43 opportunities for errors, resulting in an error rate of 13.95%. This affected six residents (Resident #17, #20, #24, #33, #44 and #46), out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy for insulin pens. Review of Novolog (a rapid acting insulin injected just below the skin that helps lower mealtime blood sugar spikes) Flex Pen (insulin in a pen-type device) manufacturer instructions, revised February 2023, showed: - Before each injection small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use, to avoid injecting air and to ensure proper dosing: remove the cap; attach the needle; prime the pen by turning the dose selector to select two units; [...]
  6. D
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that included an antibiotic stewardship program. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 2018, showed: - The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) follows national standards and guidelines to prevent, recognize and control the onset and spread of infection whenever possible; - The Infection Prevention and Control Program includes an antibiotic stewardship program. [...]
February 9, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all residents were kept free from possible accident hazards when the facility staff failed to monitor one resident (Resident #12) outside the sample for self administration of dietary supplements bought on the Internet and for giving the same supplements to another resident (Resident #49) out of a sample of 18. The facility census was 73. Record review of the facility policy titled Medications Brought to the Facility by the Resident/Family, revised April 2007, showed: -The facility shall ordinarily not permit residents and families to bring medications into the facility; -Residents and families must report to the nursing staff any medications that they want to bring, or have brought into the facility; [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize proper technique during incontinent care for one resident (Resident #3) when staff touched the trash can during care and dropped the box of wipes on the floor three times. Staff did not change gloves, perform hand hygiene after touching the trash can and the box of wipes that he/she picked up from the floor. During wound care staff failed to use a barrier for supplies, disinfect the bandage scissors, used for multiple residents, before and after use, and perform appropriate hand hygiene and glove changes for one resident (Resident #14), outside of 18 sampled residents. [...]
  3. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of ongoing assessments, monitoring, and communication between the facility and the dialysis (a process for removing waste and excess water from the blood) center for one resident (Resident #7) out of 18 sampled residents and two residents (Resident #31 and #32) outside of the sample. The facility's census was 73. Record review of the facility's policy, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident With revised September 2010, showed: - Agreements between this facility and the contracted end stage renal disease facility (ESRD) include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed including: a) How the care plan will be developed and implemented; b) How information will be exchanged between the facilities. 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record showed: [...]
  4. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the pharmacist's recommendations in regard to the resident's antidepressant medications for two residents (Resident #14 and #22) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 73. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Gradual Dose Reduction of Psychotropic Drugs, updated September 2022, showed: - Reducing the need for and maximizing the effectiveness of medications shall be considered for all residents who use psychotropic drugs; - GDR's will be documented on the psychotropic Dose Reduction History form; [...]
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to label and store drugs in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and had potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 73. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, last revised April 2007, showed: - Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers; - The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner; - Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at nurse's station or other secure location. Medications must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly. 1. [...]
  6. D
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    F868 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee attendees included an Infection Preventionist (IP). This failure had the potential to affect all 73 residents who reside at the facility. The facility's census was 73. Record review of the QAA Committee Members did not show the Infection Preventionist as a committee member. Record review of the QAA committee attendance records, dated July 2022 through December 2022, provided by the facility, showed the Infection Preventionist did not attend the meetings as required. During an interview on 2/9/23 at 5:35 P.M., the Administrator said their Infection Preventionist is new and recently certified. She said the Infection Preventionist needs to be put on the list. She said the previous IP attended meetings. [...]

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 8, 2026, 1 on September 13, 2024, 2 on February 9, 2023.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
    K 919 · September 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · February 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · February 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.313.433.86
Registered nurses0.480.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.903.013.42
Nurse aides2.28
Licensed practical nurses0.54
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)31.1%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover22.2%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.48 on weekdays and 2.90 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.19 in April to June 2025 to 3.31 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.310.483.482.90 0.0%0 of 9069
Oct to Dec 20253.290.363.462.85 0.0%0 of 9269
Jul to Sep 20253.340.593.492.96 0.0%0 of 9269
Apr to Jun 20253.190.463.342.82 3.0%0 of 9173
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.518.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.21.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.32.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.14.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.82.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.017.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.54.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.423.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.026.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.313.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.12.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.42.31.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ELDERCARE OF MARBLE HILL, LLC. CMS links this home to Stonebridge Senior Living, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 3.3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Lierman, Mark5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual100%11/01/2021
Lierman, MarkCorporate officerIndividual11/01/2021
Bridge Rehabilitation IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization02/01/2024
Eldercare Management Services IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization03/29/1999
Enterprise Bank & TrustOperational/managerial controlOrganization05/30/2008
Doerhoff, EricOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2021
Ellis, ReneeOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2016
Jansen, AbbeyOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/19/2024
Lierman, MarkOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2021
Palen, JamesOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
Thayer, JeanneOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2021
Bridge Rehabilitation IncAdp of the SNFOrganization04/22/2025
Eldercare Management Services IncAdp of the SNFOrganization04/22/2025
Forvis Mazars LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization01/25/2016
Lierman Family Partnership IIAdp of the SNFOrganization10/01/1999
Wipfli LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Cook, KellieAdp of the SNFIndividual07/07/2011
Doerhoff, EricAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2021
Ellis, ReneeAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2016
Jansen, AbbeyAdp of the SNFIndividual08/19/2024
Lierman, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2021
Miller, BethAdp of the SNFIndividual01/17/2023
Palen, JamesAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Thayer, JeanneAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 13, 2024: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.90 hours per resident per day, below the Missouri average of 3.01.

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Stonebridge Marble Hill's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Stonebridge Marble Hill 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Stonebridge Marble Hill get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 8, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Stonebridge Marble Hill been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Stonebridge Marble Hill accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Stonebridge Marble Hill?
CMS lists 24 owners and managers, and links the home to Stonebridge Senior Living. Legal business name: ELDERCARE OF MARBLE HILL, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection