Home / California / Cupertino
Sunny View Manor
22445 Cupertino Road, Cupertino, CA 95014 · Santa Clara County · (408) 454-5600
48 certified beds, about 37 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555342 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since October 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,176 in the last three years; the largest was $8,176, and the latest is dated April 18, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.92 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.98 of those hours.
14.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to Front Porch, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
April 17, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
- F Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, dietary staff interview and document review, the facility failed to conserve nutritional food value. The cooked food prepared for lunch on 4/14/25 were placed on the steamtable 1 1/2 hours prior to service. This failure had the potential to compromise nutritional quality and palatability of residents who received meals from the kitchen.
- E Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, dietary staff interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency when two of two kitchen staff did not follow manufacturer's instruction when testing the potency of a chemical used to sanitize kitchen cookware. This failure had the potential of cookware not being sanitized and placed residents at health risk.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, dietary staff interview and document review the facility failed to ensure cooked foods were stored under safe temperatures and failed to cover meats and vegetables in the walk-in refrigerator. The failure of not verifying meat temperatures after blast chilling (rapidly chilling food with cold air) had the potential of causing food borne illness had the foods were not chilled to the correct temperature. The failure of not covering refrigerated foods had the potential to diminish its taste and placed the risk for food contamination.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for administering oxygen (colorless and odorless gas which is essential for life) for one of two residents (Resident 83). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 83's well- being.
April 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, The facility failed to ensure staff promptly reported a significant change in condition to the physician for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). Staff failed to promptly report a significant change in condition to the physician when Resident 1 showed a reduced level of alertness and Resident 1's Glasgow Coma Scale (a scale used to reliably measure a person's level of consciousness after a brain injury) was 9 out of 15 (where a score of 13 or higher correlates with mild brain injury, a score of 9 to 12 correlates with moderate brain injury, and a score of 8 or less represents severe brain injury). [...]
January 12, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage and preparation in the kitchen when: 1. Produce was not labeled or dated in the walk-in refrigerator. 2. Hot foods were not kept at 135 degrees Fahrenheit during meal service tray line. These failures had the potential for all residents in the facility to be introduced to food borne illnesses.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant F (CNA F) did not perform hand hygiene in between Resident 83's bed making task and glove changed; 2. Certified Nursing Assistant G (CNA G) did not perform hand hygiene in between serving food to residents (Residents 15, 184, 16 and 8) and when assisting two residents with meals (Residents 5 and 83); and 3. Registered Nurse C (RN C) did not perform hand hygiene in between medication administration task and glove changed (Residents 134 and 233). These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety in the facility.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan when one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 233) did not have application of left-arm brace included in the Care Plan (CP). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate communication between staff in providing necessary treatment.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to meet the professional standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Residents 233) when registered nurse C (RN C ) did not shake the Med Plus (nutritional supplement) as directed prior to pouring in the medication cup; the Med Plus was not dated when opened; and RN C provided a wrong consistency of Med Plus to Resident 233, nectar thick consistency (liquids that are easily pourable and are comparable to heavy syrup found in canned fruit) instead of thin liquids as diet ordered. These failures had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of the residents.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for effective communication when a facility did not provide language assistance or other communication aid to two of three sampled residents with language barrier (speaking in foreign language) (Residents 83 and 4). This failure had the potential to affect the psychosocial well-being of these residents and a decline in their activities of daily living.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 16) remained free from accident hazards due to the use of bed rail (side rail) when Resident 16 had the left upper bed rail raised up while in bed without bed rail assessment, physician's order and care plan. This failure had the potential to put Resident 16 at risk for entrapment and serious injury.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe administration of medication and accurate accountability of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) when: 1. Registered nurse E (RN E) left the medication at resident's overbed table without ensuring Resident 136 had swallowed the solution. This failure had the potential for resident not taking the medications or having swallowing difficulty or choking without the nurse present for immediate help; and 2. Random controlled medication use audits for 2 out of 5 residents (Residents 135 and 8) did not reconcile. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals (therapeutic substance like a vaccine or drug) are labeled in accordance with professional standards, when expired Prostat (liquid protein supplement) bottles were found in the medication storage room. This failure could potentially compromise the health and safety of the residents.
- D Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct therapeutic diet (A therapeutic diet is a meal plan that controls the intake of certain foods and food consistency) to one of 41 sampled residents (Resident 4) as ordered by Resident 4's physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to choke on foods not prepared in the correct consistency.
October 14, 2022Standard inspection · 13 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased of observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the registered dietitian effectively carried out the functions of the Food and Nutrition Services as evidenced by lapses in the delivery of services associated with staff competency (Cross-reference F802), portion sizes for puree diets (cross-reference F803), food safety and sanitation (Cross-reference F812), and pests in the kitchen (Cross-reference F925). This failure to ensure food and nutrition services systems are accurately and effectively delivered may result in food borne illness for a highly susceptible population and/or not meeting the nutritional needs of the 31 residents who ate food by mouth from the kitchen out of a facility census of 32.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe sanitary practice in the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when: 1. Time temperature control for safety foods (TCS - another name for Potentially Hazardous food)) that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens (i.e., bacterial or viral organisms capable of causing a disease or toxin formation) were not properly cooled down, 2. Cups for fruit, and mugs for juice were stored with residue inside; 3. The meat slicer was stored with food particles on it; 4. The can opener had residue build-up around the blade and base; 5. No use by dates labeled on the eight pieces of vacuumized flat iron steak inside the walk -in refrigerator and thawing meat had no dates to indicate when it was put in the refrigerator; and 6. [...]
- E Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when one staff did not properly prepare pureed foods (a texture modified diet that minimizes the amount of chewing required and increases the ease of swallowing). This failure had the potential to decrease the attractiveness, flavor, and nutrients, possibly resulting in decreased dietary intake and may result in not meeting the nutrition needs for six residents receiving puree foods out of a facility census of 32.
- E Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident group agreed to a meal span of more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day. This failure had the potential to not meet the needs of 31 residents eating meals at the facility out of a census of 32.
- E Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper disposal of garbage in the dumpster container when it was not properly contained, overflowing, and left open. This failure had the potential for a hazardous environment for the residents and staff due to possible harborage and feeding of pest.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective infection control process when: 1. An incentive spirometer's (I.S. medical device to improve lung function) hose was touching the table surface; 2. A dirty oxygen concentrator (medical device for oxygen therapy) was stored in the clean utility room; 3. Used hand sanitizing wipes were left on the dining table accessible to resident; 4. An opened dirty laundry bag was exposed on top of a dirty linen cart; 5. A nasal cannula tubing (device used to deliver oxygen to a person) did not have a date of placement and monitoring sheet; 6. Licensed Vocational Nurse F (LVN F) did not wash her hands before administering the eye drop to Resident 231, and LVN F did not wash or sanitize her hands after administering medication to Resident 231; 7. [...]
- E Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of pests as evidenced by flying insects seen near the kitchen drains and ant on the kitchen wall near the freezer. This failure to maintain an effective pest control program had the potential to cause a health hazard to the residents and staff eating food from the kitchen.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect for one of twelve sampled residents (Resident 2) when staff did not assist Resident 2 during lunch while another resident at the same table was already eating with staff assistance. This deficient practice violated the resident's right to be treated with dignity.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety when Resident 24 administered his own medication and it was not stored properly for one of twelve sampled residents (Resident 24). This failure had the potential to results in improper use of the medications.
- D The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure contact information of the California Department of Public Health District Office (CDPH DO) was accessible for four of four residents (Residents 4, 15, 16, and 20). This failure had the potential for residents not to file for complaints and grievances.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for three of 12 residents (12, 14 and 16) when: 1. Resident 12 had an arteriovenous (AV) shunt (a connection made between an artery and a vein) for dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) on her left upper arm. Certified nursing assistant D (CNA D) stated he took Resident 12's blood pressure on her left wrist; 2. Restorative nursing assistant (RNA) program was not followed for Resident 12 to provide two times per week instead of three times per week. Resident 16's RNA program three times per week instead of five times per week as ordered by the physician; and 3. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 12 percent (% unit of measurement) error rate when three medication errors out of 25 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for three of 11 residents (9, 17, and 231). These failures resulted in medications not given in accordance with prescriber's orders, which had the potential for residents to not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications or had the potential for preventable side effects for the residents.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facilty record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed when two out of two residents (Residents # 20, 22) on regular pureed diets (texture modified diets for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) were served the wrong portion size for the entrée. This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs thus further compromising the nutritional status of these residents, out of a facility census of 32.
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 17, 2025, 6 on January 12, 2024, 3 on October 14, 2022.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Use approved construction type or materials.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 18, 2024 | Fine | $8,176 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.92 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.98 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.32 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.86 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.08 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 14.3% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.16 on weekdays and 4.32 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.95 in April to June 2025 to 4.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.92 | 0.98 | 5.16 | 4.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 37 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.72 | 0.95 | 4.94 | 4.16 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.63 | 0.72 | 4.79 | 4.21 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.95 | 0.76 | 5.17 | 4.39 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.9 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.0 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.4 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: FRONT PORCH COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES. CMS links this home to Front Porch, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 4.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Porch Communities and Services | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/01/2006 |
| Duranteau, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Forte, Vincent | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Handy, Joanne | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Jacobs, Laura | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Kroeker, Kevin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| McGovern, Marion | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Spencer, Peter | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Tonnu, Diemlan | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Wesson, Oliver | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Whittaker, Susan | Corporate director | Individual | 01/23/2018 | |
| Kelly, Sean | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/06/2023 | |
| Salvador, Eduardo | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/03/2017 | |
| Vranich, Rachel | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/17/2022 | |
| Akopyan, Gevork | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/12/2022 | |
| Balaan, Marites | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/21/2014 | |
| Burgoyne, Bradley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/11/2024 | |
| Humphries, Sheila | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2002 | |
| Ichien, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/04/2018 | |
| Kelly, Sean | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/06/2023 | |
| Macango, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/04/2026 | |
| McMullin, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Olson, Kari | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2001 | |
| Salvador, Eduardo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/03/2017 | |
| Merkin, Nickolas | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 09/05/2025 | |
| Nelson, Harry | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 09/05/2025 | |
| Pennington, Paige | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 09/05/2025 | |
| Front Porch Communities and Services | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2006 | |
| Burgoyne, Bradley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/11/2024 | |
| Humphries, Sheila | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2002 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 12, 2024: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 14, 2022: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Cupertino Healthcare & Wellness Center Cupertino, 0.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 70 citations
- Health Care Ctr at the Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, 1.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Idylwood Care Center Sunnyvale, 2.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Sunnyvale Post-Acute Center Sunnyvale, 2.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 68 citations
- Los Altos Post-Acute Los Altos, 2.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Mountain View Healthcare Center Mountain View, 3.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 60 citations
- Sunnyvale Gardens Post Acute Sunnyvale, 3.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 54 citations
- Cedar Crest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Sunnyvale, 3.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 32 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Sunny View Manor's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Sunny View Manor 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Sunny View Manor get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 17, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Sunny View Manor been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,176 in the last three years.
- Does Sunny View Manor accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Sunny View Manor?
- CMS lists 30 owners and managers, and links the home to Front Porch. Legal business name: FRONT PORCH COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.